Add Organizational Behavior notes
|
@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
|
|||
> ### 001 - Course Introduction
|
||||
> Class Notes - August 21, 2023
|
||||
> Emilio Soriano Chávez
|
||||
> ***
|
||||
> <span style="color:#e74c3c">Organizational Behavior</span>
|
||||
> Spring 2023
|
||||
|
||||
- **Organizational Behavior:**
|
||||
- The study of organizations as collections of people.
|
||||
- Work together.
|
||||
- Coordinate their actions.
|
||||
|
||||
- Examine how people think, feel, and what they do at three levels:
|
||||
- Individual Level
|
||||
- Group/Team Level
|
||||
- Organization Level
|
||||
|
||||
- Contingency / Probabilistic Perspective
|
||||
|
||||
- How understanding people at these levels contributes to organizational effectiveness:
|
||||
- We can get a competitive advantage.
|
||||
- Improve individual and group performance.
|
||||
- Reduce dysfunctional behaviors.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Topics:**
|
||||
- Personality
|
||||
- Motivation
|
||||
- Decision Making
|
||||
- Power Politics
|
||||
- Conflict Handling and Negotiation
|
||||
- Perception
|
||||
- Communication
|
||||
- Leadership
|
||||
- Cultural Values
|
||||
- Organizational Change
|
||||
|
||||
- Organizational Behavior improves performance and satisfaction.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,238 @@
|
|||
> ### 002 - Introduction to the Field of Organizational Behavior
|
||||
> Class Notes - August 21, 2023
|
||||
> Emilio Soriano Chávez
|
||||
> ***
|
||||
> <span style="color:#e74c3c">Organizational Behavior</span>
|
||||
> Spring 2023
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**2.1 - What is Organizational Behavior**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Organizational Behavior (OB):**
|
||||
> The study of what people think, feel, and do in and around **organizations**.
|
||||
- Looks at employee behaviors, decisions, perceptions, and emotional responses.
|
||||
- Examines how individuals and teams in organizations relate to one another.
|
||||
- Studies how organizations interact with their external environments.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Levels of Analysis in OB:**
|
||||
- Individual Level
|
||||
- Team Level
|
||||
- Organization Level
|
||||
|
||||
- **Organizations:**
|
||||
> Groups of people who work interdependently toward some purpose.
|
||||
- <u>There are many organizations that exist without a physical space or government documentation</u>.
|
||||
- Organizations are collective entities.
|
||||
- Individuals that interact in an organized way.
|
||||
- Members of organizations have a collective sense of purpose.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**2.2 - Why Organizational Behavior is Important**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Most Important Skills for New Hires:**
|
||||
- Problem Solving
|
||||
- Analytical Thinking
|
||||
- Strategic Thinking
|
||||
- Ability to Work Effectively in Teams
|
||||
- Collaboration
|
||||
- Interpersonal Skills
|
||||
- People Management
|
||||
- Communication
|
||||
- Leadership
|
||||
|
||||
- <u>Organizational behavior theories have the objective of making organizations more effective</u>.
|
||||
- **Organizational Effectiveness:**
|
||||
> Ideal state of an organization when it:
|
||||
> - Has a good fit with its **external environment**.
|
||||
> - Effectively **transforms inputs to outputs** through human capital.
|
||||
> - **Satisfies the needs of stakeholders**.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Organizations are Open Systems:**
|
||||
- An organization <u>depends on the external environment</u> for resources.
|
||||
- The environment will also have laws, norms, and expectations which place demands on the organization.
|
||||
|
||||
![[A001 - Organizations as Open Systems.png | 600]]
|
||||
|
||||
- Organizations have numerous **subsystems** that <u>transform incoming resources into outputs</u>.
|
||||
- These outputs can be desirable (products and services), or undesirable (pollution) to the external environment.
|
||||
- Organizations will receive feedback for this process.
|
||||
|
||||
- Organizations are most effective when they maintain a *good fit* with their environment.
|
||||
- This means that the <u>inputs, processes, and outputs are aligned with the available resources, needs, and expectations of the environment</u>.
|
||||
- Organizational Behavior identifies characteristics that *fit* some environments.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Human Capital:**
|
||||
> Knowledge, skills, abilities, creativity, and other resources that **employees bring to the organization**.
|
||||
- Provides a competitive advantage.
|
||||
- Employee talents are difficult to find, copy, or replace with technology.
|
||||
- <u>Effective organizations enhance human capital</u>.
|
||||
- Organizational Behavior identifies ways to strengthen employee motivation.
|
||||
- **Boosting Organizational Effectiveness Through Human Capital:**
|
||||
1. Improve employee skills and knowledge.
|
||||
- *Improving ability improves performance*.
|
||||
2. Superior human capital means better adaptability at changing environments.
|
||||
3. Developing human capital means the company invests and rewards its workforce.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Stakeholders:**
|
||||
> Individuals, groups, and entities that affect or are affected by an organization's objectives and actions.
|
||||
- Effective organizations understand, manage, and satisfy stakeholder needs and expectations.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Values:**
|
||||
> Stable, evaluative beliefs that guide our preferences for outcomes or actions.
|
||||
- Values motivate our decisions and behavior.
|
||||
- <u>Stakeholders rely on their personal values</u> to decide how a company should prioritize its investments and distribute its earnings.
|
||||
|
||||
- <u>Individual inputs and processes influence individual outcomes</u>.
|
||||
- These will have a direct effect on the effectiveness of an organization.
|
||||
- *The effectiveness of an organization depends on how well employees perform their jobs*.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**2.3 - Anchors of Organizational Behavior Knowledge**
|
||||
|
||||
- Organizational Behavior makes it easier to understand, predict, and influence organizational events.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Anchors of Organizational Behavior:**
|
||||
- **Systematic Research Anchor:**
|
||||
- <u>Organizational Behavior knowledge should be based on systematic research</u>.
|
||||
- This involves creating research questions, collecting data, and testing hypotheses.
|
||||
- **Practical Orientation Anchor:**
|
||||
- <u>Organizational Behavior theories need to be useful in practice</u>.
|
||||
- An OB theory needs to be practical to use in organizations.
|
||||
- **Multidisciplinary Anchor:**
|
||||
- <u>The Organizational Behavior field should welcome theories and knowledge from other disciplines</u>.
|
||||
- Psychology aids in understanding individual behavior.
|
||||
- Sociology contributes to the knowledge of team dynamics and social system aspects.
|
||||
- **Contingency Anchor:**
|
||||
- <u>The effectiveness of an action may depend on the situation</u>.
|
||||
- The same solution will rarely apply in every circumstance.
|
||||
- *A particular action may have different consequences under different conditions*.
|
||||
- **Multiple Levels of Analysis Anchor:**
|
||||
- <u>Events can be understood from three levels of analysis: individual, team, and organization</u>.
|
||||
- Research carefully identifies the appropriate level of analysis for each variable in a study.
|
||||
- <u>Most variables are better understood by considering all three levels of analysis</u>, like communication.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**2.4 - The Emerging Workplace Landscape**
|
||||
|
||||
- Organizations experience unprecedented change.
|
||||
- Global competition and rapid technological change alter business strategies and workplace activities.
|
||||
- Organizational Behavior guides organizations through this turbulence.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Diversity and the Inclusive Workplace:**
|
||||
- **Inclusive Workplace:** A workplace that values people of all identities and allows them to be fully themselves.
|
||||
- **Surface-Level Diversity:** Observable demographic or physiological differences in people.
|
||||
- Includes race, ethnicity, gender, age, and disabilities.
|
||||
- **Deep-Level Diversity:** Differences in the psychological characteristics of employees.
|
||||
- Includes personalities, beliefs, values, and attitudes.
|
||||
- Some deep-level diversity can be associated with surface-level diversity.
|
||||
- Inclusive workplaces produce favorable outcomes for employees and organizations.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Work-Life Integration:**
|
||||
> Degree that people are effectively engaged in various work and non-work roles, and have a low degree of conflict across them.
|
||||
- This has replaced *work-life balance*, which implies (incorrectly) that work and non-work roles are completely separate.
|
||||
- <u>A person's work and non-work roles are integrated because the resources produced or consumed by one role enrich or undermine the success of the other</u>.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Remote Work:**
|
||||
> Occurs when employees work from home or other non-work site.
|
||||
- It can also occur when employees are temporarily assigned to a client's workspace.
|
||||
- It is becoming increasingly common because employees can easily connect through information technology.
|
||||
- **Benefits:**
|
||||
- Better work-life integration.
|
||||
- Attractive benefit for applicants.
|
||||
- Low employee turnover.
|
||||
- Higher productivity.
|
||||
- Reduced greenhouse gas emissions.
|
||||
- Lowe real estate costs.
|
||||
- **Risks:**
|
||||
- Social isolation.
|
||||
- Lower team cohesion.
|
||||
- High stress due to home or family responsibilities.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Employment Relationships:**
|
||||
- **Direct Employment:**
|
||||
> Workers in full-time, permanent jobs.
|
||||
- Usually assumes continues (lifetime) employment.
|
||||
- Organizations invest in the employee's skills.
|
||||
- Expectations of career advancement.
|
||||
- Other (more fragile) forms include part-time, on-call, casual, and seasonal employment.
|
||||
- **Indirect Employment:**
|
||||
> Occurs when people are temporarily assigned or *indefinitely leased* to client firms.
|
||||
- Fastest growing work relationship.
|
||||
- Occurs as a result of outsource non-core work activities to specialized firms.
|
||||
- **Self-Employed Contract Work:**
|
||||
> Independent organization that provides services to a client organization.
|
||||
- Platform-based workers can be included, but they are more likely to be *on-call employees* as they depend on the platform.
|
||||
|
||||
- Direct employment relationships tend to produce higher work quality.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**2.5 - MARS Model of Individual Behavior and Performance**
|
||||
|
||||
- **MARS Model:**
|
||||
> Model that represents the four variables that directly influence an individual's behavior and performance.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> These variables are:
|
||||
> - **M**otivation
|
||||
> - **A**bility
|
||||
> - **R**ole Perceptions
|
||||
> - **S**ituational Factors
|
||||
- All four factors are essential influences on an individual.
|
||||
- If any of them is low in a given situation, the employee will perform poorly.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Motivation:**
|
||||
> Forces within a person that affect his or her direction, intensity, and persistence of effort for behavior.
|
||||
- **Direction ->** The path along which people steer their effort.
|
||||
- **Intensity ->** Amount of effort allocated to the goal.
|
||||
- **Persistence ->** Length of time that an individual continues to exert effort toward an objective.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Ability:**
|
||||
> The learned capabilities and natural aptitudes required to complete a task.
|
||||
- **Learned Capabilities ->** Skills and knowledge acquired through practice or training.
|
||||
- **Aptitudes ->** Natural talents that help people learn tasks more quickly or perform them better.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Role Perceptions:**
|
||||
> The degree to which a person understands the job duties assigned to or expected of him or her.
|
||||
- These perceptions range from *role clarity* to *role ambiguity*.
|
||||
- **Role Clarity:** When the individual:
|
||||
1. Understands the specific duties or consequences for which the employee is accountable.
|
||||
2. Understands the priority of assigned tasks and performance expectations (for instance, if *quality is preferred over quantity*).
|
||||
3. Understands the preferred behaviors or procedures for accomplishing tasks.
|
||||
- <u>People are more confident when they know what is expected of them</u>.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Situational Factors:**
|
||||
- <u>Individual behavior and performance depends on the situation, which is beyond the employee's immediate control</u>.
|
||||
- **Situational Influences:**
|
||||
1. Work context constrains or facilitates behavior and performance.
|
||||
- For example, lack of resources results in poor performance, even with motivated and skilled employees.
|
||||
2. Work environment provides cues to guide and motivate people.
|
||||
- For example, warning signs cue employees to avoid hazards.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**2.6 - Types of Individual Behavior**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Task Performance:**
|
||||
> An individual's voluntary goal-directed behaviors that contribute to organizational objectives.
|
||||
- Most jobs require individuals to complete several tasks.
|
||||
- **Types of Task Performance:**
|
||||
- Proficient (Work efficiently and accurately)
|
||||
- Adaptive (Modify thoughts to align new or changing processes)
|
||||
- Proactive (Anticipate and introduce new work patterns)
|
||||
|
||||
- **Organizational Citizenship Behaviors (OCBs):**
|
||||
> Forms of cooperation to others that support an organization's social and psychological context.
|
||||
- Some OCBs are directed towards individuals, like assisting coworkers, showing courtesy and sharing work resources.
|
||||
- Other OCBs represent helpfulness towards the organization, like supporting a company's public image.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Counterproductive Work Behaviors (CWBs):**
|
||||
> Voluntary behaviors that can directly or indirectly harm the organization.
|
||||
- Includes harassing coworkers, creating unnecessary conflict, deviating from preferred work methods, among others.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Joining and Staying with the Organization:**
|
||||
- <u>Human capital is an organization's main source of competitive advantage</u>.
|
||||
- This importance is apparent when employees quit, as they remove valuable knowledge, skills, and relationships, which take time for new staff to acquire.
|
||||
- Employee turnover has adverse effects on customer service, team development, and corporate culture strength.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Maintaining Work Attendance:**
|
||||
- Organizations need employees to show up for work at scheduled times.
|
||||
- Unscheduled absenteeism leads to increased workloads, lower performance, poorer coordination, poorer customer service, and potential accidents.
|
||||
- <u>Most absenteeism is the result of situational factors, like personal illness, family demands and bad weather</u>.
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,402 @@
|
|||
> ### 003 - Individual Differences: Personality and Values
|
||||
> Class Notes - August 28, 2023
|
||||
> Emilio Soriano Chávez
|
||||
> ***
|
||||
> <span style="color:#e74c3c">Organizational Behavior</span>
|
||||
> Spring 2023
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**3.0 - Video Lecture Notes**
|
||||
|
||||
- **MARS Model:**
|
||||
- Individual characteristics influence an individual's Motivation, Ability, and Role Perception.
|
||||
- Situational Factors
|
||||
- They all influence behavior and results.
|
||||
|
||||
- Performance is a function of ability, motivation, and opportunity.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Important Behaviors:**
|
||||
- **Job/Task Performance:**
|
||||
- *How good are you at your job?*
|
||||
- Individual performance will aggregate towards group performance.
|
||||
- **Organizational Citizenship Behaviors:**
|
||||
- Discretionary behaviors that cause the organization to run better.
|
||||
- Not actually part of the job description.
|
||||
- Higher levels in an organization causes it to perform better.
|
||||
- **Counterproductive Work Behaviors:**
|
||||
- Also called *Job Withdrawal Behaviors*.
|
||||
- Decrease performance.
|
||||
- Hurt organizational performance.
|
||||
- Unmotivated employees engage in them.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Personality:** The relatively enduring pattern of thoughts, emotions, and behaviors that characterize a person, along with the psychological processes behind those characteristics.
|
||||
- They are enduring and pretty stable.
|
||||
- Some have strong heritability and others are more socially influenced.
|
||||
- At around 20, personality tends to set.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Main Models of Personality:**
|
||||
- **Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)**
|
||||
- Gives a 4 letter designation depending on the following scale:
|
||||
- Extraversion-Introversion
|
||||
- Sensing-Intuitive
|
||||
- Thinking-Feeling
|
||||
- Judging-Perceiving
|
||||
- When *in the middle* of any of these categories, it is possible to *hop* between categories depending on your mood.
|
||||
- Can be frustrating.
|
||||
- Not commonly used in research due to the low stability.
|
||||
- Can be hard to figure what the labels mean.
|
||||
- **Five Factor Model (*Big Five*)**
|
||||
- High, moderate, or low in the following five scalesL
|
||||
- **Extraversion**
|
||||
- Introverted or extroverted.
|
||||
- If in the middle, we call it an *ambivert*.
|
||||
- **Agreeableness**
|
||||
- Importance that people surrounding you get along.
|
||||
- Dislike of conflict. Can lead to being a *people pleaser*.
|
||||
- **Conscientiousness**
|
||||
- How detail oriented are you?
|
||||
- Highly related to work performance.
|
||||
- **Openness to Experience**
|
||||
- The extent to which you like new things and different experiences.
|
||||
- *Enjoying stuff just because its new*.
|
||||
- Low openness means you like routines a lot and do not like stepping out of your conscious zone.
|
||||
- **Neuroticism**
|
||||
- Called the *need for stability*.
|
||||
- The inverse is called *emotional stability*.
|
||||
- High neuroticism do not deal well with stress.
|
||||
- There can be multiple sub-scales that add nuance.
|
||||
- **Acronyms:** OCEAN or CANOE
|
||||
- This model was done using a cluster analysis.
|
||||
- Very stable interpretation of personality because it was done across cultures.
|
||||
- The four MBTI scales can be completely represented with the *Big Five*, if we go to sub-scale level.
|
||||
- Some believe the MBTI encourages division due to categorization.
|
||||
- Others believe it is easier to offer a *rule of thumb* for a category that a *Big Five*.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Values:** Stable, evaluative beliefs that guide our preferences and behaviors.
|
||||
- Things that we think are *good or bad*.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Schwartz's Value Circumplex:**
|
||||
- Composed of 10 values which primarily lie along two continuums:
|
||||
- Self-Transcendence
|
||||
- Concerned about helping other people.
|
||||
- High universalism and benevolence.
|
||||
- Self-Enhancement
|
||||
- Focused on helping yourself.
|
||||
- Interested in your own achievement and power.
|
||||
- Hedonism -> Extent to which you enjoy yourself.
|
||||
- Openness to Change
|
||||
- Interest in trying new things.
|
||||
- Desire to be in charge of our own.
|
||||
- High autonomy and empowerment.
|
||||
- Stimulation -> Novel and interesting things.
|
||||
- Conservation
|
||||
- High security and safety.
|
||||
- Valuing of tradition.
|
||||
- *Continue to do what has been done*.
|
||||
- Conformity -> Rules and norms are there for a reason.
|
||||
|
||||
- There is a lot of variety in personalities and values.
|
||||
- There is no correct personality test.
|
||||
- There is not a perfect personality or set of values for group success.
|
||||
- Similar personalities will have lots of agreement and high cohesion, but it causes groupthink (no one questions, all agree).
|
||||
- Different personalities can cause conflict, but with effective communication we have better ideas and solutions.
|
||||
|
||||
- It is important to understand our own personality traits:
|
||||
- Tells us how we react in different situations.
|
||||
- Know how we interact with others.
|
||||
- What to change for the better.
|
||||
- Know what is important to find a job that fits you best.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**3.1 - Personality and the Five-Factor Model in Organizations**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Personality:**
|
||||
> The enduring pattern of thoughts, emotions, and behaviors that characterize a person.
|
||||
- *What makes us similar to or different from other people*.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Personality Traits:** Discernible patterns in an individual's behavior.
|
||||
- Each trait implies that there is something in an individual that predicts behavioral tendency.
|
||||
|
||||
- Although people have behavioral tendencies, they do not at the same way in all situations.
|
||||
- *People vary their behavior to suit the situation*.
|
||||
|
||||
- <u>Personality is shaped by both nature and nurture</u>.
|
||||
- *Nature* -> Refers to genetic or hereditary origins.
|
||||
- Our genetic code affects our attitudes, decisions, and behaviors.
|
||||
- *Nurture* -> Socialization, experiences, and interaction with the environment.
|
||||
- Personality develops and changes from childhood to adulthood.
|
||||
- Some traits increase and some decline.
|
||||
- Personality becomes more stable during adulthood, as we form a clearer and rigid self-concept (*who we are*).
|
||||
- **Executive Function:** Part of the brain that regulates goal-directed behavior so that it is consistent with our self-concept.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Five-Factor Model (FFM) of Personality:**
|
||||
> The five broad dimensions representing most personality traits. These include (*CANOE*):
|
||||
> - Conscientiousness
|
||||
> - Agreeableness
|
||||
> - Neuroticism (Emotional Stability)
|
||||
> - Openness to Experience
|
||||
> - Extraversion
|
||||
- Also called the *Big Five*.
|
||||
- Results indicate that it is robust across cultures.
|
||||
- **Conscientiousness:**
|
||||
> People who are organized, dependable, goal-focused, thorough, disciplined, methodical, and industrious.
|
||||
- Low conscientiousness people tend to be careless, disorganized, and less thorough.
|
||||
- **Agreeableness:**
|
||||
> People who are trusting, helpful, good-natured, considerate, tolerant, selfless, generous, and flexible.
|
||||
- Low agreeableness people tend to be uncooperative, intolerant, more suspicious, and self-focused.
|
||||
- **Neuroticism:**
|
||||
> People who tend to be anxious, insecure, self-conscious, depressed, and temperamental.
|
||||
- Low neuroticism people are poised, secure, and calm.
|
||||
- **Openness to Experience:**
|
||||
> People who are imaginative, creative, unconventional, curious, nonconforming, autonomous, and aesthetically perceptive.
|
||||
- People with low openness are more resistant to change, less open to new ideas, and more conventional and fixed.
|
||||
- **Extraversion:**
|
||||
> People who are outgoing, talkative, energetic, sociable, and assertive.
|
||||
- People with *introversion* are quiet, cautious, and less interactive.
|
||||
|
||||
- Personality affects behavior through motivation.
|
||||
- It influences an individual's choice of goals, intensity, and persistence.
|
||||
|
||||
- <u>Conscientiousness is the best overall personality predictor of proficient task performance</u>.
|
||||
- Conscientious employees have higher personal goals and are more persistent.
|
||||
- They are more organized and engage in less counterproductive behaviors.
|
||||
|
||||
- Extraversion is the second best overall predictor for proficient task performance.
|
||||
- Associated with influencing others and being comfortable in social settings.
|
||||
- Effective leaders are somewhat more extraverted.
|
||||
|
||||
- Assertiveness is a string predictor of adaptive and proactive performance.
|
||||
- Assertive employees *take charge* when approaching situations.
|
||||
|
||||
- Agreeableness is associated with organizational citizenship.
|
||||
|
||||
- Openness to experience is a weak predictor of task performance, but one of the best predictors of adaptive and proactive performance.
|
||||
- Employees with high openness have more curiosity, imagination, and tolerance of change.
|
||||
|
||||
- Emotional stability is one of the best predictors of adaptive performance.
|
||||
|
||||
- ***Big Five* Factors and Work Performance:**
|
||||
|
||||
![[A002 - Personality and Work Performance.png | 600]]
|
||||
|
||||
- <u>The *perfect employee* is not the individual with the highest scores on all Big Five personality factors</u>.
|
||||
- The relationship between some factors and performance is nonlinear.
|
||||
- Some behaviors are predicted better by a specific trait than by the overall Big Five factor for that trait.
|
||||
- Personality is not completely static, some factors increase or decrease as we age.
|
||||
- The five-factor model does not represent all of the *personality domain*.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**3.2 - The Dark Triad and MBTI Types**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Dark Triad:**
|
||||
> Cluster of three socially undesirable personality traits:
|
||||
> - Machiavellianism
|
||||
> - Narcissism
|
||||
> - Psychopathy
|
||||
- **Machiavellianism:**
|
||||
> People with a string motivation to get what they want at the expense of others.
|
||||
- These people (*high-Machs*) take pleasure in misleading, outwitting, and controlling others.
|
||||
- They use manipulation, exploitation, and undesirable influence tactics.
|
||||
- Cynical disregard for moral principles.
|
||||
- **Narcissism:**
|
||||
> People who have an obsessive belief in their superiority and entitlement.
|
||||
- They aggressively engage in self-promotion and attention-seeking behaviors.
|
||||
- Intensely envious of others.
|
||||
- Envy manifests in arrogance, *schadenfreude* (deriving pleasure from another's misfortune) and exploitation of others.
|
||||
- **Psychopathy:**
|
||||
> Social predators who ruthlessly dominate and manipulate others without empathy or remorse.
|
||||
- Selfish self-promoters who use superficial charm, but engage in antisocial, impulsive, and fraudulent behavior.
|
||||
- *These people do as they please and take what they want*.
|
||||
|
||||
- <u>The Dark Triad predicts counterproductive work behaviors</u>.
|
||||
- **Counterproductive Work Behaviors:** Voluntary behaviors that directly or indirectly harm the organization.
|
||||
|
||||
- Dark Triad traits are associated with white-collar crime behavior.
|
||||
- <u>People with Dark Triad traits are more likely to engage in bullying and workplace aggression</u>.
|
||||
- People with high psychopathy take excessive risks, due to overconfidence and disregard for consequences.
|
||||
|
||||
- <u>Dishonesty is a core characteristic of the Dark Triad</u>.
|
||||
- People with these traits are more likely to lie and deceive.
|
||||
- They undermine others for their gain.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Organizational Politics:**
|
||||
> Use of influence tactics for personal gain at the expense of others and the organization.
|
||||
- Produces dysfunctional outcomes.
|
||||
|
||||
- People with Dark Triad traits are not always worse.
|
||||
- A manipulative political skill is rated favorably by some supervisors.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI):**
|
||||
> Instrument to measure elements of the Jungian personality theory, particularly preferences regarding perceiving and judging information.
|
||||
|
||||
![[A003 - MTBI.png | 500]]
|
||||
|
||||
- <u>Carl Jung suggested that personality is represented by an individual's preferences regarding perceiving and judging information</u>.
|
||||
- These represent a person's attitude towards the external world.
|
||||
- **Perceiving Function:** How people prefer to gather information. Composed of:
|
||||
- **Sensing (S):** Perceiving information directly through the five senses.
|
||||
- *The here and now*
|
||||
- **Intuition (N):** Relies on insight and experience to see relationships among variables.
|
||||
- *Future possibilities*
|
||||
- **Judging Function:** How people prefer making decisions based on their perceptions. Composed of:
|
||||
- **Thinking (T):** Relying on rational cause-effect logic and systematic data collection.
|
||||
- **Feeling (F):** Relying on emotional responses to options presented.
|
||||
- In addition, people differ in their levels of **extraversion-introversion**.
|
||||
|
||||
- People with a *perceiving* orientation are open, curious and flexible.
|
||||
- People with a *judging* orientation prefer order, structure, and quick problem solving.
|
||||
|
||||
- <u>MTBI is usually a poor predictor of job performance</u>
|
||||
- It should be avoided for employment selection.
|
||||
- It has also questionable value when predicting leadership.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**3.3 - Values in the Workplace**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Values:** Stable beliefs that guide a person's preferences for outcomes or courses of action in different situations.
|
||||
- Perceptions about *what is good or bad*.
|
||||
- They serve as a *moral compass* and influence our motivations and decisions.
|
||||
- They provide justification for past behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Value System:** Arrangement of values according to a hierarchy of preferences.
|
||||
- Unique to each person.
|
||||
- Reinforced by experiences and society.
|
||||
- Stable and long-lasting.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Personal Values:** Values that exist only within individuals.
|
||||
- **Shared Values:** Values that are similar (or the same) across groups of people.
|
||||
- **Organizational Values:** Values shared by people throughout an organization.
|
||||
- **Cultural Values:** Values shared across a society.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Values vs. Personality Traits:**
|
||||
- Values are evaluative, as they tell us what we *ought* to do.
|
||||
- Some values may be opposed to other values.
|
||||
- More influenced by socialization.
|
||||
- Personality traits describe what we naturally *tend* to do.
|
||||
- They have minimal conflict between each other.
|
||||
- More influenced by heredity.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Schwartz's Values Circumplex:**
|
||||
> Model of personal values that clusters 57 values into 10 broad categories, including:
|
||||
> - Universalism
|
||||
> - Benevolence
|
||||
> - Tradition
|
||||
> - Conformity
|
||||
> - Security
|
||||
> - Power
|
||||
> - Achievement
|
||||
> - Hedonism
|
||||
> - Stimulation
|
||||
> - Self-Direction
|
||||
|
||||
![[A004 - Schwartz's Values Circumplex.png | 500]]
|
||||
|
||||
- The 10 broad categories are clustered into four quadrants:
|
||||
- **Openness to Change:** Extent to which a person is motivated to pursue innovative ways.
|
||||
- **Conservation:** Extent to which a person is motivated to preserve the *status quo*.
|
||||
- **Self-Enhancement:** How much a person is motivated by self-interest.
|
||||
- **Self-Transcendence:** Motivation to promote the welfare of others.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Influence of Values on Decisions and Behavior:**
|
||||
- <u>Values influence the attractiveness of choices</u>:
|
||||
- Decisions are guided by personal values because they generate feelings towards the available choices.
|
||||
- Positive feelings for choices aligned with our values.
|
||||
- Negative feelings for choices contrary to our values.
|
||||
- <u>Values frame our perceptions of reality</u>:
|
||||
- Personal values influence whether we notice something, and how we interpret it.
|
||||
- <u>Values help regulate consistency of behavior</u>:
|
||||
- People are motivated to act consistently with their personal values.
|
||||
- *The more a behavior aligns with our values, the more motivated we are to engage in that behavior*.
|
||||
|
||||
- There are situations that can prevent us from engaging in values-consistent behavior.
|
||||
- Strong counter-motivational forces cause an individual to deviate from personal values.
|
||||
- We also do not think about our values most of the time.
|
||||
- Their relevance is not obvious in many situations.
|
||||
- <u>People are more likely to apply their values when they are explicitly reminded of them and see their relevance to the situation</u>.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Values Congruence:**
|
||||
> How similar a person's value hierarchy is to the value hierarchy of another entity (like a team or an organization).
|
||||
- <u>When personal values are congruent with an organization's values, employees tend to have higher job satisfaction, loyalty and organizational citizenship</u>.
|
||||
|
||||
- Employees with diverse values offer different perspectives that can lead to better decision making.
|
||||
- Organizations can benefit from some *incongruence*.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**3.4 - Ethical Values and Behavior**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Ethics:** The study of moral principles that determine whether actions are right or wrong, and outcomes are good or bad.
|
||||
- People rely on ethical values to know the *right thing to do*.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Four Ethical Principles:**
|
||||
- **Utilitarianism:**
|
||||
> The only moral obligation is to seek the greatest good for the greatest number of people.
|
||||
- We must choose the option that produces the highest satisfaction to those affected.
|
||||
- Requires a *cost-benefit analysis*.
|
||||
- Focuses only on outcomes, even if the means may be considered unethical by other principles.
|
||||
- **Individual Rights:**
|
||||
> Everyone has the same natural rights.
|
||||
- These can include freedom of speech, freedom of movement, among others.
|
||||
- Includes human rights that are a moral norm of society.
|
||||
- Some individual rights may conflict with others.
|
||||
- **Distributive Justice:**
|
||||
> Benefits and burdens of similar individuals should be the same, or otherwise proportional.
|
||||
- Inequalities are acceptable when they benefit the *least well off* in society.
|
||||
- Difficult to agree on who is *similar* and what is *relevant*.
|
||||
- **Ethic of Care:**
|
||||
> Everyone has a moral obligation to help others within their relational sphere.
|
||||
- Caring for others is fundamental.
|
||||
- Includes being attentive to others' needs, give care to others, and having empathy.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Moral Intensity:**
|
||||
> The degree to which an issue demands the application of ethical principles.
|
||||
- An issue about:
|
||||
1. How seriously people will be affected.
|
||||
2. Probability that the outcomes will ocur.
|
||||
3. How many people will be affected.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Moral Sensitivity:**
|
||||
> A person's ability to detect a moral dilemma and estimate its relative importance.
|
||||
- Estimate the moral intensity of an issue.
|
||||
- People with high moral sensitivity can know when unethical behavior occurs.
|
||||
- Affected by:
|
||||
- Knowledge of prescriptive norms and rules.
|
||||
- Previous experience with specific moral dilemmas.
|
||||
- Ability to empathize with those affected.
|
||||
- Strong self-view of being a morally sensitive person.
|
||||
- High degree of situational mindfulness.
|
||||
|
||||
- <u>Ethical conduct is influences by the situation in which the conduct occurs</u>.
|
||||
- Situational factors do not justify unethical conduct.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Code of Ethical Conduct:** Statement about desired practices, rules of conduct, and philosophy of an organization's relationship to its stakeholders and the environment.
|
||||
- Suppose to motivate and guide employee behavior.
|
||||
- They may do little to reduce unethical conduct.
|
||||
|
||||
- To improve ethical conduct, a strategy is to regularly train and evaluate employees on their knowledge of proper ethical conduct.
|
||||
- An ethics practice is a confidential telephone hotline operated by an independent organization) where employees can anonymously report suspicious behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**3.5 - Values Across Cultures**
|
||||
|
||||
- <u>Values not only differ among individuals and across organizations, but also across societies</u>.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Individualism:**
|
||||
> The extent to which we value independence and personal uniqueness.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Collectivism:**
|
||||
> The extent to which we value our duty to groups to which we belong.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Power Distance:**
|
||||
> The degree to which people accept unequal distribution of power in a society.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Uncertainty Avoidance:**
|
||||
> The degree to which people tolerate ambiguity or feel threatened by it.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Achievement-Nurturing Orientation:**
|
||||
> The degree to which people in a culture emphasize competitive versus cooperative relations with other people.
|
||||
|
||||
- Cross-cultural knowledge often comes from small, convenient samples to represent an entire culture.
|
||||
- Many conclusions may not generalize to the cultures they intend to represent.
|
||||
|
||||
- Cross-cultural studies often assume each country has one culture.
|
||||
- Many countries have become culturally diverse.
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,352 @@
|
|||
> ### 004 - Employee Motivation
|
||||
> Class Notes - September 07, 2023
|
||||
> Emilio Soriano Chávez
|
||||
> ***
|
||||
> <span style="color:#e74c3c">Organizational Behavior</span>
|
||||
> Spring 2023
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**4.1 - Employee Motivation, Drives, and Needs**
|
||||
|
||||
- Motivation is one of the elements in the MARS model.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Motivation:**
|
||||
> Forces within a person that affect his/her direction, intensity, and persistence of voluntary behavior.
|
||||
- **Direction:** *What people are focused on achieving*.
|
||||
- **Intensity:** *Amount of energy expended to achieve an objective*.
|
||||
- **Persistence:** *How long people sustain their effort*.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Employee Engagement:**
|
||||
> An individual's emotional and cognitive motivation.
|
||||
- Refers to a focused, intense, persistent, and purposive effort toward work-related goals.
|
||||
- Associated with *self-efficacy*, which is the belief that you have the ability and resources to get a job done.
|
||||
- Also includes a high level of *absorption*, which is the experience of focusing intensely on the task.
|
||||
- <u>Employee engagement predicts employee performance</u>.
|
||||
- Disengaged employees tend to be disruptive.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**4.2 - Employee Drives and Needs**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Drives:**
|
||||
> Hardwired characteristics of the brain that correct deficiencies by producing emotions to energize individuals.
|
||||
- Also called **primary needs**.
|
||||
- There is no *agreed-upon* list of human drives, but there are some *consistent;y-identified* drives, including:
|
||||
- Having social interaction.
|
||||
- Develop our competence.
|
||||
- Comprehend our surroundings.
|
||||
- Defend ourselves against harm.
|
||||
- <u>Drives are universal and innate</u>.
|
||||
- <u>Drives generate emotions</u>.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Needs:**
|
||||
> *Goal-directed* forces that people experience.
|
||||
- *Needs are emotions that we become consciously aware of*.
|
||||
|
||||
- <u>People develop different intensities of needs in a particular situation</u>.
|
||||
- The individual's self-concept amplifies or suppresses emotions.
|
||||
|
||||
![[A005 - Drives and Needs.png | 500]]
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**4.3 - Drive-Based Motivation Theories**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Four-Drive Theory:**
|
||||
> Motivation theory that states that emotions are the source of human motivation.
|
||||
- <u>Emotions are generated through four drives</u>:
|
||||
- **Drive to Acquire:**
|
||||
- Drive to seek out, take, control, and retain objects and experiences.
|
||||
- Produces needs like achievement, competence, status, self-esteem, and competition.
|
||||
- **Dive to Bond:**
|
||||
- Produces the need for belonging and affiliation.
|
||||
- Motivates cooperation.
|
||||
- **Drive to Comprehend:**
|
||||
- Motivates discovering answers and conflicting ideas.
|
||||
- **Drive to Defend:**
|
||||
- Drive to protect ourselves.
|
||||
- Creates a *fight-or-flight* response.
|
||||
- All drives are hardwired in our brains and exist in all human beings.
|
||||
- <u>Drives are independent from one another</u>.
|
||||
- The first three drives are proactive, while the *drive to defend* is reactive.
|
||||
- Social norms, personal values, and past experiences guide our *motivational energy*.
|
||||
- We choose a course of action that is consistent and acceptable with these.
|
||||
|
||||
![[A006 - Four-Drive Theory.png | 600]]
|
||||
|
||||
- **Practical Implications:**
|
||||
- Best workplaces help employees fulfill all four drives.
|
||||
- Fulfillment must be balanced.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Maslow's Needs Hierarchy Theory:**
|
||||
> Motivation theory of needs arranged in a hierarchy. People are motivated to fulfill a higher need as one becomes gratified.
|
||||
- Condenses *primary needs* into five categories organized in a hierarchy (from lowest to highest).
|
||||
1. **Physiological:** Need for food, water, air, etc.
|
||||
2. **Safety:** Need for security and stability.
|
||||
3. **Belongingness/Love:** Need for interaction and affection.
|
||||
4. **Esteem:** Need for self-esteem and social status.
|
||||
5. **Self-Actualization:** Need for self-fulfillment.
|
||||
- The **need to know** and **need for beauty** are *innate needs* that do not fit in the hierarchy.
|
||||
|
||||
![[A007 - Maslow's Needs Hierarchy Theory.png | 500]]
|
||||
|
||||
- <u>The strongest motivation comes from the lowest unsatisfied need</u>.
|
||||
- The four bottom groups are considered *deficiency needs*.
|
||||
- They become activated when unfulfilled.
|
||||
- *Self-actualization* is a *growth need*.
|
||||
- It continues to develop even when temporarily satiated.
|
||||
- Maslow's needs hierarchy theory was dismissed.
|
||||
- <u>People have different hierarchies of values</u>.
|
||||
- Employees needs are influenced by self-concept and personal values.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Intrinsic Motivation:**
|
||||
> Motivation that occurs when people are fulfilling their needs for competence and autonomy by engaging in the activity itself, rather than from an externally controlled outcome.
|
||||
- *Intrinsically motivated* employees feel competent when applying their skills and observing positive, meaningful outcomes from that effort.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Extrinsic Motivation:**
|
||||
> Motivation that occurs when people want to engage in an activity for instrumental reasons (receiving something beyond their personal control).
|
||||
- *Directing one's effort towards a reward controlled by others*.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Additive Hypothesis:**
|
||||
- Someone performing an intrinsically motivated job becomes more motivated by receiving an extrinsic source of motivation.
|
||||
- **Contrasting Hypothesis:**
|
||||
- Introducing extrinsic sources of motivation will reduce intrinsic motivation.
|
||||
- Introducing extrinsic motivators reduces an employee's feeling of autonomy.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Learned Needs Theory:**
|
||||
- <u>Needs are amplified or suppressed through self-concept, social norms, and past experiences</u>.
|
||||
- <u>Needs can be strengthened or weakened trough reinforcement, learning, and social conditions</u>.
|
||||
- **Learned Needs:**
|
||||
- **Need for Achievement (nAch):**
|
||||
- Chose moderately challenging tasks.
|
||||
- Desire unambiguous feedback and recognition for success.
|
||||
- Preference for working alone rather than in teams.
|
||||
- Money is a weak motivator for people with high nAch, but it can be a strong motivator for people with low nAch.
|
||||
- **Need for Affiliation (nAff):**
|
||||
- Seek approval from others.
|
||||
- Want to conform to others' wishes and expectations.
|
||||
- Avoid conflict and confrontation.
|
||||
- High nAff employees work well in jobs where the task is cultivating long-term relations.
|
||||
- **Need for Power (nPow):**
|
||||
- Exercise control over others.
|
||||
- Highly involved in team decisions.
|
||||
- Rely on persuasion.
|
||||
- Concerned about maintaining leadership position.
|
||||
- *Personalized Power* -> Individuals enjoy power for its own sake.
|
||||
- *Socialized Power* -> Individuals desire power as means to help others.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**4.4 - Expectancy Theory of Motivation**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Expectancy Theory:**
|
||||
> Motivation theory based on the idea that work effort is directed towards behavior that people believe will lead to favorable outcomes.
|
||||
- Assumes people are rational decision makers that choose a target that will fulfill their needs.
|
||||
- An individual's effort level depends on three factors:
|
||||
- **Effort-to-Performance Expectancy (E-to-P):**
|
||||
- An individual's perception that his/her effort will result in a particular level of performance.
|
||||
- **Performance-to-Outcome Expectancy (P-to-O):**
|
||||
- Perceived probability that a specific behavior will lead to a particular outcome.
|
||||
- **Outcome Valences:**
|
||||
- **Valence:** Anticipated satisfaction or dissatisfaction that an individual feels towards an outcome.
|
||||
|
||||
![[A008 - Expectancy Theory.png | 600]]
|
||||
|
||||
- **Increasing E-to-P Expectancy:*
|
||||
- Influenced by the individual's belief that they can successfully complete a task.
|
||||
- <u>Increased by assuring employees that they have the required abilities, resources, and clear role perceptions</u>.
|
||||
- <u>Involves matching employee abilities to job requirements and clearly communicating the tasks required for the job</u>.
|
||||
- **Increasing P-to-O Expectancy:**
|
||||
- <u>Increased by measuring employee performance accurately and distributing more valued rewards to those with higher job performance</u>.
|
||||
- *Employees need to believe that higher performance will result in higher rewards*.
|
||||
- **Increasing Outcome Valences:**
|
||||
- Reward valence varies from one person to the next, as each person has different priorities.
|
||||
- <u>Individualize rewards by allowing employees to choose the rewards of greatest value to them</u>, or find a reward that everyone values to some degree.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Issues with Expectancy Theory:**
|
||||
- Assumes people are perfectly rational.
|
||||
- Mainly explains extrinsic motivation.
|
||||
- Ignores emotions as a source of motivation.
|
||||
- Does not explain how employees develop expectancies.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**4.5 - Organizational Behavior Modification and Social Cognitive Theory**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Organizational Behavior Modification (OB Mod):**
|
||||
> Theory that explains behavior in terms of antecedent conditions and consequences of that behavior.
|
||||
- **Behaviorism:** A good theory should rely exclusively on behavior and the environment.
|
||||
- Ob Mod attempts to **change behavior (B)** by managing its **antecedents (A)** and its **consequences (C)**.
|
||||
- **Antecedents:** Events preceding the behavior, informing that an action will produce specific consequences. They <u>do not cause behavior</u>.
|
||||
- **Consequences:** Events that follow a particular behavior that influence its future occurrence.
|
||||
|
||||
![[A009 - OB Mod.png | 500]]
|
||||
|
||||
- **Types of Consequences (Contingencies of Reinforcement):**
|
||||
- **Positive Reinforcement:** When the introduction of a consequence increases or maintains the probability of a specific behavior.
|
||||
- **Punishment:** When a consequence decreases the probability of the occurrence of a specific behavior.
|
||||
- **Extinction:** When the target behavior decreases because no consequence follows it.
|
||||
- **Negative Reinforcement:** When the removal of a consequence increases or maintains the probability of a specific behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
- <u>Positive reinforcement should follow desired behaviors</u>.
|
||||
- <u>Extinction should follow undesirable behaviors</u>.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Schedules of Reinforcement:**
|
||||
- **Continuous Reinforcement:** Providing positive reinforcement after every occurrence of the desired behavior.
|
||||
- **Variable Ratio Schedule:** Providing positive reinforcement after a varying number of times.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Social Cognitive Theory:**
|
||||
> Theory that explains how learning and motivation occur by observing and modeling others, as well as anticipating the consequences of our behavior.
|
||||
- **Learning Behavior Consequences:**
|
||||
- People learn consequences of behavior by observing or hearing from others, not only by direct experience.
|
||||
- People logically anticipate consequences in related situations.
|
||||
- **Behavior Modeling:**
|
||||
- People learn by imitating and practicing the behaviors of others.
|
||||
- Modeling behavior gives learners direct sensory experience.
|
||||
- Helps develop strong self-efficacy.
|
||||
- **Self-Regulation:**
|
||||
- Individuals set goals and engage in other forms of intentional, purposive action.
|
||||
- People establish their own short- and long-term objectives.
|
||||
- **Self-Reinforcement:** *Rewarding or punishing oneself for exceeding or falling short of a self-set goal*.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**4.6 - Goal Setting and Feedback**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Goal:**
|
||||
> A cognitive representation of a desired end state that a person is committed to attain.
|
||||
- Motivates people by clarifying role perceptions and directing effort.
|
||||
- Amplifies the intensity and persistence of effort.
|
||||
- **Characteristics of Effective Goals:** SMARTER
|
||||
- Specific (*What needs to be accomplished*)
|
||||
- Measurable (*Indication of progress*)
|
||||
- Achievable (*Sufficient but not over-challenging*)
|
||||
- Relevant (*In the individual's control*)
|
||||
- Time-Framed (*Having a due date*)
|
||||
- Exciting (*Challenging goals*)
|
||||
- Reviewed (*Receiving feedback*)
|
||||
|
||||
- **Feedback:**
|
||||
- Information that lets us know whether we have achieved a goal or are probably directing our effort towards it.
|
||||
- Contributes to motivation and performance.
|
||||
- Feedback must be specific, relevant, timely, credible, and sufficiently frequent.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Strengths-Based Coaching:**
|
||||
- Also known as *appreciative coaching*.
|
||||
- Maximized employees' potential by focusing on their strengths rather than their weaknesses.
|
||||
- A *coach* asks exploratory questions to help employees discover ways to build on their strengths.
|
||||
- *People are more receptive to information about their strengths than their weaknesses*.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Sources of Feedback:**
|
||||
- **Social Sources**
|
||||
- **Nonsocial Sources:** Feedback without someone communicating information.
|
||||
- **Multisource (360-Degree) Feedback:**
|
||||
- Information collected from a full circle of people, like subordinates, peers, supervisors, and customers.
|
||||
- More complete and accurate.
|
||||
- Better sense of fairness.
|
||||
- Can be expensive, time-consuming, and biased.
|
||||
- Can be ambiguous.
|
||||
|
||||
- Difficult goals can motivate some people to engage in unethical behavior.
|
||||
- Difficult goals can be stressful and undermine performance.
|
||||
- Goal setting should be avoided when employees are in the middle of a learning process.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**4.7 - Organizational Justice**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Types of Justice:**
|
||||
- **Distributive Justice:**
|
||||
> The perception that appropriate decision criteria have been applied to calculate how benefits and burdens are distributed.
|
||||
- **Procedural Justice:**
|
||||
> The perception that appropriate procedural rules have been applied throughout the decision process.
|
||||
- **Interactional Justice:**
|
||||
> The perception that appropriate rules have been applied in the way employees are treated throughout the decision process.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
- **Equality Principle:** *When we believe everyone in a group should receive the same outcomes*.
|
||||
- **Need Principle:** *When we believe that those with the greatest need should receive more than others with less need*.
|
||||
- **Equity Principle:** *People should be paid in proportion to their contribution*.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Equity Theory:**
|
||||
> Employees determine whether a decision is equitable by comparing their own outcome/input ratio to the outcome/input ratio of another person.
|
||||
- **Outcome/Input Ratio:** Value of outcomes received divided by the value of inputs provided.
|
||||
- Inputs can be skill, effort, performance, experience, and hours worked.
|
||||
- Outcomes can be pays, promotions, recognition, and opportunities.
|
||||
- <u>Equity is determined in terms of a *comparison other*</u>.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Inequity Tension:** Negative emotions that occur when people believe they are under- or over-rewarded.
|
||||
- Actions to reduce this can include reducing inputs, increasing outcomes, increase the comparison other's inputs, or reduce the comparison other's outputs.
|
||||
- Other actions include asking the company to reduce a coworker's pay, changing our beliefs about the situation, changing the comparison other, or leaving the field.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Maintaining Procedural Justice:**
|
||||
- Decision makers must be perceived as unbiased and without self-interest.
|
||||
- Decisions should be based on relevant and accurate information.
|
||||
- Decisions need to account for the diverse groups affected by the outcomes.
|
||||
- Criteria and procedures should be compatible with ethical principles.
|
||||
- Employees should be given *voice* in the process.s
|
||||
- Employees should have a right to appeal the decision.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Maintaining Interactional Justice:**
|
||||
- Treating people with politeness and respect.
|
||||
- Employees should receive well-justified explanations about decisions.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**4.8 - Job Design**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Job Design:** The process of assigning tasks yo a job.
|
||||
- Tries to balance competing effects of efficiency and motivation.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Job Specialization:** When work is subdivided into separate jobs assigned to different people.
|
||||
- Improved work efficiency.
|
||||
- Less skills and knowledge to learn.
|
||||
- More frequent practice.
|
||||
- Less attention residue from changing tasks.
|
||||
- Better person-job matching.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Scientific Management:** Practice of partitioning work into its smallest elements and standardizing tasks to achieve maximum efficiency.
|
||||
- Associated with high levels of work specialization.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Problems with Job Specialization:**
|
||||
- Adversely affects employees attitudes and motivation.
|
||||
- Some jobs become tedious, socially isolating, and cognitive dysfunctional.
|
||||
- Produce higher employee turnover and absenteeism.
|
||||
- Reduces work attractiveness and motivation.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Job Characteristics Model:**
|
||||
> Job design model that relates motivational properties of jobs to specific personal and organizational consequences.
|
||||
|
||||
![[A010 - Job Characteristics Model.png | 500]]
|
||||
|
||||
- Identifies five core job dimensions that produce three psychological states.
|
||||
- Employees with these psychological states have higher motivation, satisfaction, and performance.
|
||||
- **Core Job Characteristics:**
|
||||
- **Skill Variety:** Use of different skills and talents to perform tasks.
|
||||
- **Task Identity:** Degree to which a job requires completion of a whole or identifiable piece of work.
|
||||
- **Task Significance:** Degree to which the job affects the organization and the larger society.
|
||||
- **Autonomy:** Freedom, independence, and discretion in scheduling.
|
||||
- **Job Feedback:** Degree to which employees can tell how well they are doing.
|
||||
- **Critical Psychological States:**
|
||||
- **Felt Meaningfulness of the Work:** Belief that one's work is important.
|
||||
- **Felt Responsibility for Work Outcomes:** Sense of being accountable for work outcomes.
|
||||
- **Knowledge of Work Results:** Awareness of outcomes based on information of the job.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Social and Information Processing Job Characteristics:**
|
||||
- **Task Variability:** *How predictable the job duties are from one day to the next*.
|
||||
- Variability increases employee motivation due to non-routine work patterns.
|
||||
- **Task Analyzability:** *How much the job can be performed using known procedures and rules*.
|
||||
- High task analyzability results in low information processing due to reliance in established guidelines.
|
||||
- Employees are less motivated when doing jobs with high task analyzability.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Increasing Motivational Potential of Jobs:**
|
||||
- **Frequent Job Rotation:**
|
||||
- Moving employees through two or more jobs each day.
|
||||
- Reduces risk of repetitive strain and heavy lifting injuries.
|
||||
- Employees learn to perform multiple jobs.
|
||||
- Clearer picture of processes.
|
||||
- Employees use a wide variety of skills.
|
||||
- **Job Enlargement:**
|
||||
- Practice of increasing the number and variety of related tasks assigned to a job.
|
||||
- More skill variety.
|
||||
- Reduces repetitive strain injuries.
|
||||
- **Job Enrichment:**
|
||||
- Occurs when employees are given more responsibilities for scheduling, coordinating, and planning their own work.
|
||||
- Increases job satisfaction and work motivation.
|
||||
- Reduces absenteeism and turnover.
|
||||
- Increases quality as it increases an employee's felt responsibility and sense of ownership.
|
||||
- *Natural Grouping* -> Combining highly interdependent tasks into one job.
|
||||
- *Establishing Client Relationships* -> Putting employees in direct contact with clients.
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,351 @@
|
|||
> ### 005 - Perceiving Ourselves and Others in Organizations
|
||||
> Class Notes - September 07, 2023
|
||||
> Emilio Soriano Chávez
|
||||
> ***
|
||||
> <span style="color:#e74c3c">Organizational Behavior</span>
|
||||
> Spring 2023
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**5.0 - Video Lecture Notes**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Self-Concept:**
|
||||
> Your beliefs about yourself and self-evaluations.
|
||||
- *Who are you?*
|
||||
- *How do you feel about yourself?*
|
||||
- Composed of the many identities (or labels) that you have.
|
||||
- Examples include student, millennial, soccer player, worker, among others.
|
||||
- We are composed of many identities, that may overlap.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Characteristics of Self-Concept:**
|
||||
- **Complexity:**
|
||||
> The number of distinct and important identities you perceive yourself as having, and how interconnected or distinct they are.
|
||||
- *How many labels do you have?*
|
||||
- *How much do these labels overlap?*
|
||||
- The more interconnected these labels are, the lower the complexity.
|
||||
- **Consistency:**
|
||||
> Extent to which identities require similar personality traits, values, or actions.
|
||||
- *Be the same kind of person as you inhabit these identities*.
|
||||
- If we exhibit different personality traits and actions, we end up with low consistency.
|
||||
- There is a potential for *cognitive dissonance*.
|
||||
- We simultaneously act in two different ways, which causes stress.
|
||||
- **Clarity:**
|
||||
> Extent to which your self-concept is clear, stable, and confidently defined.
|
||||
- *Do we confidently know who we are?*
|
||||
|
||||
- <u>High complexity, consistency, and clarity are related to higher levels of well-being</u>.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Self-Enhancement:**
|
||||
> Motivation to have a positive self-concept.
|
||||
- *We are motivated to have a positive self-concept*.
|
||||
- <u>Can make us perceive our ability and sill level to be higher than it actually is</u>.
|
||||
- Can cause trouble with performance and the organization.
|
||||
- Can also be used to motivate employees.
|
||||
- Assign activities that amplify their self-concept.
|
||||
- Can make employees feel more engaged and motivated.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Self-Verification:**
|
||||
> Desire to conform and maintain our self-concept.
|
||||
- *We want people to think we are who we think we are*.
|
||||
- Seek social input.
|
||||
- As a manager, we can reflect the positive aspects of the self-concept of an employee.
|
||||
|
||||
- If we want to teach children to be *more moral*, we should help them build a *moral self-concept*.
|
||||
- Attribute positive actions to their self-concept.
|
||||
- *You helped do X because you are a good person*.
|
||||
- *You delivered X, you are a reliable person*.
|
||||
- Reinforcing elements of the self-concept.
|
||||
- Attribute negative actions to behavior while preserving a positive self-concept.
|
||||
- *You are a good person even if you did a bad thing, and I know you can do better*.
|
||||
- Behaviors that are not reflective of their self-concept.
|
||||
- When providing feedback to an employee, be mindful of their self-concept.
|
||||
- Focus on aspects of their self-concept that you want to reinforce.
|
||||
- When criticizing something, focus on behaviors that an employee can change, rather than traits.
|
||||
- Build on positive traits and positive self-concept aspects where you can.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Self-Esteem:**
|
||||
> General feelings of self-worth or value.
|
||||
- *Do you feel like you are a good person?*
|
||||
- **Self-Efficacy:**
|
||||
> Belief in one's capacity to complete tasks successfully.
|
||||
- Can be general or *task specific*.
|
||||
- **Internal Locus of Control:**
|
||||
- *Belief that I can affect the life events I experience*.
|
||||
- *Belief that I'm the driver in my life*.
|
||||
- **External Locus of Control:**
|
||||
- *Belief that the life events I experience are beyond my control*.
|
||||
- High self-efficacy translates into a high internal locus of control.
|
||||
- Better in leadership positions.
|
||||
- Suits management better.
|
||||
|
||||
- <u>To be an effective leader and manager, you need to understand your employee's self-concept</u>.
|
||||
- This helps identify strengths and avoid or manage weaknesses.
|
||||
- Relevant for diversity management.
|
||||
|
||||
- <u>Our perceptions are our reality</u>.
|
||||
- We can call it a *socially constructed reality*.
|
||||
- <u>But our perceptions are not necessarily a true representation of reality</u>.
|
||||
- *What else are we missing?*
|
||||
- Our perceptions impact the attributions, schemas (categories), and stereotypes that we form.
|
||||
- Perceivers take stimuli from the environment, categorize them (but discard some of them).
|
||||
- These *mental models* affect what we do and do not perceive from the environment.
|
||||
- Our mood also affects our perception.
|
||||
- We often perceive things that will reinforce what we are expecting to see.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Attribution Theory:**
|
||||
> Describes how people explain the causes of behavior.
|
||||
- *Why we think people behave the way they do*.
|
||||
- Biases reduce the accuracy of attributions.
|
||||
- **Self-Serving Bias:**
|
||||
- *When we make a mistake, it's not our fault, it's the environment's fault*.
|
||||
- **Fundamental Attribution Error:**
|
||||
- When we see others doing *bad actions*, we attribute it to a *fundamental failing* on their part (like personality or motivation).
|
||||
- When they do something good, we are more likely to attribute it to the environment.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Self-Fulfilling Prophecy**
|
||||
- We need to be careful about our attributions.
|
||||
- The attributions we have about others may create the need for then to interact about them.
|
||||
- *If we perceive someone to be bad, then we can create a self-fulfilling prophecy where they are bad*.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Perceptual Errors:**
|
||||
- **Halo/Horns Effect:**
|
||||
- *When we like someone, we think that person is good at everything* -> Halo Effect
|
||||
- *When we hate someone, we think that they are bad at everything* -> Horns Effect
|
||||
- **False-Consensus Effect:**
|
||||
- *Thinking everyone around us thinks the way we do*.
|
||||
- **Primacy Effect:**
|
||||
- *When a first impression sets a tone on how we perceive something forward*.
|
||||
- **Recency Effect:**
|
||||
- *When we care the most about our most recent impression*.
|
||||
|
||||
- We use perceptions to make inferences and decisions.
|
||||
- Ideally, we want them to be accurate or be aware of their potential inaccuracy.
|
||||
|
||||
- Other people also have perceptions about you or your organization.
|
||||
- These are formed in response to your actions.
|
||||
- They can affect morale, reputation, or success.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Diversity Management:**
|
||||
- If everyone in an organization has the same set of perspectives (same experiences), we get a homogeneous set of biases and perceptions.
|
||||
- If we have people with different sets of experiences and perspectives, we have different biases.
|
||||
- This gives better coverage and a *more accurate picture*.
|
||||
- Not everyone has the same biases.
|
||||
- Our world view does not set us to monitor particularly well how others are going to perceive us.
|
||||
- Lack of diversity impedes performance and creativity.
|
||||
- We need to focus on *deep-level* diversity.
|
||||
- More than gender, skin tone, and religion.
|
||||
- Organizations need to focus on *diversity of experience*.
|
||||
- *Surface level* labels can be used as a proxy for *deep level diversity*.
|
||||
|
||||
- <u>It is important to have a diversity of perspective in an organization</u>.
|
||||
|
||||
- <u>Perception equals reality</u>.
|
||||
- People can only react to the things that they perceive.
|
||||
- They may not be an accurate representation of reality.
|
||||
- Many aspects of our life are *socially constructed*.
|
||||
|
||||
- There is more diversity than skin color, gender, and religion.
|
||||
- Diversity of experience provides the most value for organizations.
|
||||
|
||||
- Managing diversity requires to be thoughtful.
|
||||
- Can be a source of strength to an organization.
|
||||
- It has to be given a purpose, people have to bring something of value to the organization.
|
||||
- Link to performance or mission.
|
||||
- Take a learning orientation rather than achieving an end goal.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**5.1 - Self Concept**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Self-Concept:**
|
||||
> An individual's self-beliefs and self-evaluations.
|
||||
- *Who am I?*
|
||||
- *How do I feel about myself?*
|
||||
- Guides decisions and actions.
|
||||
- Defined at three levels:
|
||||
- Individual -> Personal Traits
|
||||
- Relational -> Connections to Friends and Coworkers
|
||||
- Collective -> Membership in Organizations
|
||||
- Described by three characteristics:
|
||||
- **Complexity:**
|
||||
> Number of distinct and important roles or identities that people perceive about themselves.
|
||||
- **Self-Expansion:** Motivation to increase an individual's complexity.
|
||||
- Self-concept become s more complex as we acquire additional roles.
|
||||
- Someone with multiple identities can have low complexity if they are *highly interconnected*.
|
||||
- Complexity is higher when multiple identities have low correlation with each other.
|
||||
- Only some identities dominate the attention of an individual at one time.
|
||||
- **Examples:** Student, friend, daughter, fan, etc.
|
||||
- **Consistency:**
|
||||
> Degree to which a person's identities require similar personal attributes.
|
||||
- Low consistency happens when some self-views require attributes that conflict with attributes required for other self-views.
|
||||
- Low consistency also occurs when self-views are incompatible with a person's personal attributes.
|
||||
- **Clarity:**
|
||||
> Degree to which a person's self-concept is clear, confidently defined, and stable.
|
||||
- People with high clarity are confident about *who they are*.
|
||||
- Usually increases with age, as personality and values become stable.
|
||||
|
||||
- Psychological well-being is higher with people that have high complexity, clarity, and consistency.
|
||||
- Employees with high complexity have more adaptive decision making and performance.
|
||||
- *Multiple selves* generate more diverse experiences.
|
||||
- Produces more diverse social networks.
|
||||
- Requires more effort to maintain, resulting in high stress and less efficiency.
|
||||
|
||||
- Clarity tends to improve performance.
|
||||
- Good for leadership roles.
|
||||
- Results in role inflexibility, as people cannot adapt to changing conditions.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Processes that Shape Self-Concept:**
|
||||
- **Self-Enhancement:**
|
||||
> A person's motivation to have a positive self-concept.
|
||||
- *Individuals rate themselves above average*. (overconfidence)
|
||||
- Better mental and physical health.
|
||||
- Generates a *can-do* attitude that motivates persistence.
|
||||
- Causes people to overestimate future returns in investment decisions.
|
||||
- Causes individuals to engage in unsafe behavior.
|
||||
- Accounts for repeating poor decisions.
|
||||
- **Self-Verification:**
|
||||
> A person's motivation to confirm and maintain their existing self-concept.
|
||||
- Employees actively communicate their self-concept so coworkers understand it and provide verifying feedback when observed.
|
||||
- Includes seeking feedback that may not necessarily be flattering.
|
||||
- Employees are more likely to remember information that is consistent with their self-concept.
|
||||
- They will consciously dismiss feedback that contradicts it.
|
||||
- **Self-Evaluation:**
|
||||
- Defined by three elements:
|
||||
- **Self-Esteem:** The extent to which people like, respect, and are satisfied with themselves.
|
||||
- **Self-Efficacy:** A person's belief that they have the ability to complete a task successfully. Can be specific or generalized.
|
||||
- **Locus of Control:** A person's belief about the amount of control they have over personal life events.
|
||||
- *Internal Locus of Control* -> Believing that life events are caused by personal characteristics.
|
||||
- *External Locus of Control* -> Believing that events are mainly due to fate, luck, or the environment.
|
||||
- **The Social Self:**
|
||||
- **Individual Self:**
|
||||
- **Also** called **personal identity** or **internal self-concept**.
|
||||
- Involves defining ourselves by our personal attributes.
|
||||
- Human beings have an inherent drive to be associated with others and be recognized.
|
||||
- **Social Identity:**
|
||||
- Also called **external self-concept**.
|
||||
- **Social Identity Theory:** *People define themselves by the groups to which they belong to*.
|
||||
- Association to a group makes us feel better about ourselves.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**5.2 - Perceiving The World Around Us**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Perception:**
|
||||
> Process of receiving information and making sense of the world around us.
|
||||
- *Determining which information to notice*.
|
||||
- *How to categorize and interpret information*.
|
||||
- **Selective Attention:** Process of attending some received information and ignoring other information.
|
||||
- Influenced by characteristics of what is being perceived, as well as the context on which information is being perceived.
|
||||
- The characteristics of the perceiver also influence selective attention.
|
||||
- When information is received, we attach emotional markers to the retained information.
|
||||
- They help store information, as these markers are later reproduced when recalling this information.
|
||||
|
||||
![[A011 - Perception.png | 500]]
|
||||
|
||||
- **Selective Attention Bias:** Effect of our assumptions and expectations about future events.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Confirmation Bias:** Process of *screening out* information that is contrary to our values and assumptions.
|
||||
- We usually pay attention to information that supports our decisions.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Perceptual Grouping:**
|
||||
- **Categorical Thinking:**
|
||||
>Organizing people and objects into preconceived categories.
|
||||
- It is a *perceptual grouping process*.
|
||||
- We group people based on observable similarity, or by proximity to one another.
|
||||
- *Filling in Missing Information*
|
||||
- We rely on past experiences to make sense of similar situations.
|
||||
- *Seeing patterns that are random events*.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Mental Models:**
|
||||
> Knowledge structures that we develop to explain the world around us.
|
||||
- They consist of visual or relational images in our mind.
|
||||
- They rely on perceptual grouping to make sense of things.
|
||||
- *Filling in the missing pieces*.
|
||||
- They make it difficult to see the world in different ways and block recognition of new opportunities.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**3.3 - Specific Perceptual Processes and Problems**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Stereotyping:**
|
||||
> Process of assigning traits to people based on their membership in a social category.
|
||||
- Assigned characteristics include traits, abilities, and physical characteristics.
|
||||
- Formed from personal experience, but mainly provided through media images and cultural prototypes.
|
||||
- They are *shared beliefs* across an entire society.
|
||||
- Stereotyping is a nonconscious *energy-saving* process that simplifies our understanding of the world.
|
||||
- We have an innate reason to anticipate how others will behave.
|
||||
- It is motivated by the need for social identity and self enhancement.
|
||||
- **Stereotyping Process:**
|
||||
- **Categorization:** *Categorizing people into distinct groups, ignoring individuality*.
|
||||
- **Homogenization:** *Considering people within each group as very similar to each other*.
|
||||
- **Differentiation:** *Assigning more favorable characteristics to people in our groups*.
|
||||
- Stereotyping is highly inaccurate.
|
||||
- Stereotypes are distorted and embellished.
|
||||
- They describe few people in the group.
|
||||
- They often describe *less than the majority* of members in category.
|
||||
- They lead to perceptual biases.
|
||||
- **Stereotype Threat:** When members of a group are so concerned about negative stereotypes assigned to them that they end up displaying the trait they are trying to avoid.
|
||||
- Stereotypes lay the foundation for unfair discrimination.
|
||||
- Most of it is *unintentional (systemic) discrimination*.
|
||||
- *Intentional discrimination (prejudice)* is when people hold unfounded negative attitudes towards a stereotyped group.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Attribution Theory:**
|
||||
- **Attribution Process:** Perceptual process of deciding whether an observed behavior is caused by external or internal factors.
|
||||
- Attribution involves forming beliefs about the causes of behavior.
|
||||
- **Internal Factors:** Include ability and motivation.
|
||||
- **External Factors:** Include resources, support, or luck.
|
||||
- We rely on three attribution rules to decide what causes someone's behavior:
|
||||
- Consistency
|
||||
- Low consistency weakens confidence.
|
||||
- High for both internal and external attributions.
|
||||
- Tells *how confident we should be in an attribution*.
|
||||
- Distinctiveness
|
||||
- Consensus
|
||||
|
||||
- **Attribution Errors:**
|
||||
- **Self-Serving Bias:**
|
||||
> Tendency to attribute favorable outcomes to internal factors and failures to external factors.
|
||||
- *Take credit for our successes*.
|
||||
- *Blame others for our mistakes*.
|
||||
- Occurs due to the self-enhancement process.
|
||||
- **Fundamental Attribution Error:**
|
||||
> Tendency to see the person rather than the situation as the main cause of that person's behavior.
|
||||
- Also called **correspondence bias**.
|
||||
- Occurs because observers cannot easily see external factors that constrain a person's behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Self-Fulfilling Prophecy:**
|
||||
> Process in which our expectations about another person cause that person to act more consistently with those expectations.
|
||||
- *Perceptions can influence reality*.
|
||||
- **Steps in Self-Fulfilling Prophecy:**
|
||||
1. A supervisor forms expectations about an employee's future behavior.
|
||||
2. The supervisor's expectations influence his/her behavior toward employees.
|
||||
3. The supervisor's behavior affects the employee's ability and motivation.
|
||||
4. The employee's behavior becomes more consistent with the supervisor's initial expectations.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Additional Perceptual Errors:**
|
||||
- **Halo Effect:**
|
||||
> When our general impression of a person affects our perception of other characteristics of that person.
|
||||
- **False-Consensus Effect:**
|
||||
> When we overestimate the extent to which others have beliefs similar to our own.
|
||||
- **Recency Effect:**
|
||||
> When the most recent information dominates our perception of others.
|
||||
- **Primacy Effect:**
|
||||
> Tendency to rely on the first information we receive about people to quickly form an opinion of them.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**3.4 - Improving Perceptions**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Awareness of Perceptual Biases:**
|
||||
- A way of reducing perceptual biases is by <u>knowing that they exist</u>.
|
||||
- Awareness can reduce biases by making people more mindful of their thoughts and actions.
|
||||
- It can have the unintended effect of reinforcing stereotypes rather than reducing them.
|
||||
- It is ineffective for people with *deeply held prejudices*.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Improving Self-Awareness:**
|
||||
- By discovering our perceptual biases, we reduce them through <u>increased open-mindedness toward others</u>.
|
||||
- **Implicit Association Test (IAT):** Formal test that attempts to detect subtle forms of bias by associating positive and negative words with specific groups of people.
|
||||
- **Johari Window:** Model of mutual understanding that encourages disclosure and feedback to increase the open area, and reduce blind, hidden, and unknown areas.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Meaningful Interaction:**
|
||||
- Activity in which people <u>engage in valued activities</u>.
|
||||
- **Contact Hypothesis:** *The more we interact with someone, the less prejudiced we will be against that person*.
|
||||
- Occurs when performing tasks with co-workers in an organization.
|
||||
- Strongest when people work closely and frequently with each other on shared goals.
|
||||
- Reduces dependency on stereotypes because it improves knowledge about individuals.
|
||||
- Improves **empathy** (understanding and being sensitive to other's feelings) toward others.
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,427 @@
|
|||
> ### 006 - Decision Making and Creativity
|
||||
> Class Notes - September 21, 2023
|
||||
> Emilio Soriano Chávez
|
||||
> ***
|
||||
> <span style="color:#e74c3c">Organizational Behavior</span>
|
||||
> Spring 2023
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**6.0 - Video Lecture Notes**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Types of Decisions:**
|
||||
- **Non-Programmed Decisions:**
|
||||
- Thoughtful decisions.
|
||||
- We have not encountered these situations and do not know exactly how to handle them.
|
||||
- **Programmed Decisions:**
|
||||
- Problems or opportunities that have happened before.
|
||||
- *Decision Program* - Can be codified (decision trees), or having standard procedures.
|
||||
- We are essentially on *autopilot*.
|
||||
- We can forget things or miss important detail.
|
||||
- It is possible that the decision is not appropriate for the situation, and we may not notice it.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Limits for Making Rational Decisions:**
|
||||
- **Bounded Rationality:**
|
||||
- We have finite cognitive capacity.
|
||||
- There is an amount of information that we can handle at a given time.
|
||||
- *There is only so much that we can know and process*.
|
||||
- **Satisficing:**
|
||||
- Instead of *maximizing* (choosing the best decision), we tend to choose a quick, *good enough* option.
|
||||
- **Groupthink:**
|
||||
- When, in a highly cohesive group, members want to maintain the *tranquility*, and no one wants to challenge anyone's ideas.
|
||||
- *Everyone agrees with everybody else*.
|
||||
- Interferes with communication.
|
||||
- **Biases:**
|
||||
- Escalation of Commitment:
|
||||
- Sunk Costs Fallacy
|
||||
- Prospect Theory Effect:
|
||||
- *We are not good at weighing potential gains vs. potential losses, and we tend to have unbalanced reactions.*
|
||||
- We tend to overweight the potential for gains and overweight actual loses that we have.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Rational Choice Paradigm:** Logically determine the best choice in a situation:
|
||||
1. Determine the full set of possible alternatives.
|
||||
2. Assign probabilities to each alternative.
|
||||
3. Determine satisfaction of each alternative.
|
||||
4. Calculate a subjective expected utility (probability $\times$ satisfaction).
|
||||
5. Select alternative with highest subjective expected utility.
|
||||
|
||||
- No one really makes decisions this way.
|
||||
- Theoretically, it should help us make the best non-programmed decision.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Evidence-Based Management:**
|
||||
> A system that is built around decision-making rather than an actual decision-making process.
|
||||
- *A culture that is built around the idea that you tell the hard truths*.
|
||||
- No *sugarcoating* or *keeping quiet*.
|
||||
- Focus on making decisions based on the *best evidence*.
|
||||
- Not just what *makes you feel good* or confirms your assumptions.
|
||||
- Encourage people to experiment and learn by doing.
|
||||
- Failure is an important part of the process.
|
||||
- Always consider the risks and drawbacks of recommendations, even when they look perfect.
|
||||
- *Think critically*.
|
||||
- Do not make decisions because *this is what everyone is doing or has done*.
|
||||
- Make decisions critically and for good reasons that you can list out.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Creativity:**
|
||||
> Process of generating ideas that are both novel (original) and useful (make a socially-recognized contribution).
|
||||
- It need to be both novel and useful, as ideas that are *novel just for the sake of being novel* do not make money in a business context.
|
||||
- First step in the innovation process.
|
||||
- **Innovations:** *Creative ides that have been realized*.
|
||||
- Usually related to processes and administration.
|
||||
|
||||
- **What makes people creative?**
|
||||
- **Motivation:**
|
||||
- Mostly intrinsic - *finding the work rewarding for itself*.
|
||||
- **Relevant Knowledge (Expertise)**
|
||||
- **Creative-Thinking Skills:**
|
||||
- Also called **divergent thinking skills**.
|
||||
- Developed over time.
|
||||
- *Thinking outside of the box*, *challenging assumptions*...
|
||||
|
||||
- **Supporting Creativity:**
|
||||
- **Individual Factors:**
|
||||
- Personality -> Openness to Experience
|
||||
- Emotions -> Happy People
|
||||
- Opens the cognitive frame as we are not focused on a particular source of a problem.
|
||||
- Divergent Thinking Skills
|
||||
- Unconscious Processing
|
||||
- Creative Self-Efficacy (belief in *being creative*)
|
||||
> [!INFO]
|
||||
> Consider that the only one we cannot affect is *openness to experience*. The rest can be affected by altering our surroundings or practicing.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Contextual Factors:**
|
||||
- **Organizational:**
|
||||
- Autonomy / Empowerment
|
||||
- People need freedom to be flexible and try different creative things.
|
||||
- Slack Resources
|
||||
- *Extra stuff* for employees to experiment.
|
||||
- Collaborative and Supportive Culture
|
||||
- *It is acceptable to voice ideas and to experiment with stuff that does not necessarily work.*
|
||||
- Signals of safety indicate this.
|
||||
- Consistent messaging.
|
||||
- Creativity Prompts
|
||||
- Offer instructions that ask for creative solutions.
|
||||
- Creative environments -> toys, colors, writing on walls...
|
||||
- Creative goals.
|
||||
- **Supervisor (Things to do as a Manager):**
|
||||
- Provide developmental feedback that is supportive and not overly critical.
|
||||
- Non-controlling and non-abusive.
|
||||
- Transformational Leadership -> Help grow and be the *best version of yourself*.
|
||||
- **Coworkers (Thins to do as a Coworker):**
|
||||
- Presence of creative coworkers around you.
|
||||
- Having coworker support.
|
||||
- Diversity of experience and perspective.
|
||||
|
||||
- **When is creativity appropriate?**
|
||||
- Most of the time.
|
||||
- If we want process and product improvements, or new processes or products.
|
||||
|
||||
- **When is creativity not appropriate?**
|
||||
- Significant risk aversion.
|
||||
- If managers are risk averse - they may not realize it.
|
||||
- Too worried with outcomes.
|
||||
- Conditions that do not support creative idea generation.
|
||||
- If satisficing is sufficient.
|
||||
- Creativity tends to take time -> non-programmed decision process.
|
||||
|
||||
- Multiple ways to make decisions.
|
||||
- Appropriate approach depends on the situation.
|
||||
- Hybrid Approach -> Programmed and Non-Programmed Approaches
|
||||
|
||||
- We rarely have complete information.
|
||||
- Bounded Rationality
|
||||
- Decision-making tools can help us in this case.
|
||||
|
||||
- Individual differences affect work outcomes.
|
||||
- We can do thinks (as an employee or manager) to encourage creativity in ourselves and the organization.
|
||||
- Help people overcome resistance to creativity and innovation.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**6.1 - Rational Choice Decision Making**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Decision Making:**
|
||||
> Process of making choices among alternatives with the intention of moving toward a desired state of affairs.
|
||||
- **Rational Choice Decision Making:** Process of using *pure logic* and all available information about alternatives to chose the one with the highest value.
|
||||
- **Rational Choice Decision Process:**
|
||||
1. Identify the problem or opportunity.
|
||||
- **Problem:** Deviation between the current and the desired situation.
|
||||
- **Opportunity:** Deviation between current expectations and an unexpected *potentially* better situation.
|
||||
2. Choose the best decision process.
|
||||
- **Programmed Decisions:** Follow standard operating procedures. They have been resolved in the past.
|
||||
- **Nonprogrammed Decisions:** Require all steps in the decision model, as the problems are new, complex, or not well defined.
|
||||
3. Identify or develop possible choices.
|
||||
- Search for *ready-made* solutions.
|
||||
- Design a *custom-made* solution.
|
||||
- Modify an existing solution.
|
||||
4. Select the choice with the highest value.
|
||||
- Choose the alternative with the greatest expected satisfaction.
|
||||
5. Implement the selected choice.
|
||||
6. Evaluate the selected choice.
|
||||
|
||||
- It is impossible to apply rational choice decision making in reality.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**6.2 - Identifying Problems and Opportunities**
|
||||
|
||||
- *Only when we understand the problem, we can move towards a meaningful solution*.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Problems with Problem Identification:**
|
||||
- **Mental Models:**
|
||||
> Knowledge structures that we develop to describe, explain, and predict the world around us.
|
||||
- They help us fill information that we do not immediately see.
|
||||
- They also represent how things *should* be.
|
||||
- <u>Mental models can *blind* us from seeing unique problems because they produce negative evaluations of things that deviate from them</u>.
|
||||
- **Decisive Leadership:**
|
||||
- *How quickly we determine that a situation is a problem or opportunity*.
|
||||
- Many leaders announce problems before having a chance to logically assess the situation.
|
||||
- **Stakeholder Framing:**
|
||||
- <u>Individuals provide or hide information to make the decision maker see the situation as a problem or opportunity</u>.
|
||||
- Decision makers fall for these constructed realities because they need to simplify complex and ambiguous information.
|
||||
- **Perceptual Defense:**
|
||||
- <u>Decision makers fail to recognize or quickly forget information that threatens the situation</u>.
|
||||
- More likely to occur in people with higher trait anxiety (high neuroticism) or when having limited options.
|
||||
- **Solution-Focused Problems:**
|
||||
- *Jumping to a solution before understanding the problem*.
|
||||
- Occurs when people define the problem as a *veiled solution*, meaning that <u>the problem statement is a proposed solution</u>, but the actual problem hast not been identified.
|
||||
- Happens as solutions that worked in the past come to mind before proper problem diagnosis.
|
||||
- Also occurs because decision makers are comforted by closure to problems, so they *non-consciously* embed solutions in problem definitions.
|
||||
|
||||
- By recognizing problem identification biases, decision makers can be motivated to consider other perspectives.
|
||||
- Requires considerable willpower.
|
||||
|
||||
- *Norm of Divine Discontent*:
|
||||
- Decision makers that are never satisfied with current conditions, no matter how successful the situation may be.
|
||||
- These individuals search more actively for problems and opportunities.
|
||||
|
||||
- Problem identification errors can be minimized by discussing situations with other people of different experiences and backgrounds.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Bounded Rationality:**
|
||||
> View that people are *bounded* in their decision-making capabilities due to:
|
||||
> - Access to limited information.
|
||||
> - Limited information processing.
|
||||
> - Tendency towards satisficing rather than maximizing.
|
||||
- It is an *imperfect rationality* theory that identifies ways in which human decision making differs from rational choice.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Problems with Goals:**
|
||||
- They establish *what ought to be* and are a critical component of decisions.
|
||||
- In reality, they are ambiguous or in conflict with each other.
|
||||
- Difficult to know if a particular choice has higher value to the organization.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Problems with Information Processing:**
|
||||
- People *sequentially* evaluate only a few alternatives and characteristics, instead of all alternatives and their features.
|
||||
- **Implicit Favorite:** Preferred alternative that a decision maker uses repeatedly as a comparison to other choices.
|
||||
- Usually, decision makers are *unaware* of their favoritism.
|
||||
- **Reasons for Sequentially Comparing Alternatives:**
|
||||
- It is difficult to have information about all alternatives at the same time.
|
||||
- Humans have a natural preference for comparing to choices rather than evaluating multiple alternatives at the same time.
|
||||
- People minimize mental effort by forming a preferred alternative and looking for evidence to support it (Confirmation Bias).
|
||||
- Human need for cognitive consistency and coherence.
|
||||
- Decision makers non-consciously ignore positive features of the alternatives related to their *implicit favorite*.
|
||||
- We *distort our valences* so that our implicit favorite remains the best choice.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Biased Decision Heuristics:**
|
||||
- **Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic:**
|
||||
> Tendency for people to be influenced by an initial anchor point such that they do not move away from it as new information is provided.
|
||||
- Humans tend to compare alternatives rather than evaluate them against objective criteria.
|
||||
- **Availability Heuristic:**
|
||||
> Tendency to assign higher probabilities to events that are easier to recall.
|
||||
- *How easy we recall is due to several factors, not just how often it occurs*.
|
||||
- **Representativeness Heuristic:**
|
||||
> Tendency to evaluate probabilities of events by the degree to which they resemble other events, rather than on objective information.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Problems with Maximization:**
|
||||
- **Satisficing:**
|
||||
> Selecting an alternative that is *good enough* rather than the alternative with the highest value (maximization).
|
||||
- <u>Rather than aiming for maximization, people engage in satisficing</u>.
|
||||
- This is usually necessary because choosing the best choice requires complete and perfect information.
|
||||
- This is impossible in reality.
|
||||
|
||||
- Deciding from many alternatives and many outcomes for each can be cognitively and emotionally draining.
|
||||
- Decision makers satisfice to minimize cognitive effort.
|
||||
|
||||
- A large number of choices can discourage people from making a decision at all.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Evaluating Opportunities:**
|
||||
- Decision makers usually do not evaluate alternatives when finding an opportunity.
|
||||
- *The opportunity is the solution, so why look for others*.
|
||||
- Decision makers tend to have an emotional attachment to the opportunity, which motivates decision and blocks any detailed assessment.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**6.3 - Emotions and Intuition in Decision Making**
|
||||
|
||||
- Emotions affect the evaluation of alternatives in the following ways:
|
||||
- **Emotions form Early Preferences:**
|
||||
- Emotions shape our preferences for alternatives before we consciously evaluate them.
|
||||
- Our brain attaches specific emotions to information about each alternative.
|
||||
- Our preferred alternative is influenced by its initial emotion markers.
|
||||
- Even logical analysis depends on emotions to sway decisions.
|
||||
- **Emotions Influence the Decision Evaluation Process:**
|
||||
- *We pay more attention to details when in a negative mood*.
|
||||
- *When in a positive mood, we pay less attention to details and rely on a programmed decision routine*.
|
||||
- When angry, decision makers rely on stereotypes and *shortcuts* to speed up the choice process.
|
||||
- <u>Emotions shape how we evaluate information</u>.
|
||||
- **Emotions Serve as Information when we Evaluate Alternatives:**
|
||||
- *Emotions as Information*
|
||||
- We *listen* to our emotions to get guidance when making choices.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Intuition:**
|
||||
> Ability to know when a problem or opportunity exists and to select the best course of action **without conscious reasoning**.
|
||||
- Intuition and logical analysis are not opposites, as emotions are always present in decision making.
|
||||
- It is both an *emotional experience* and a *fast non-conscious analytic process*.
|
||||
- *Gut feelings* are emotional signals with enough intensity to make us aware of them.
|
||||
- Not all emotional signals are intuition.
|
||||
- They are only *valid intuition* when they rely on mental models that can predict the situation where we sense the problem or the opportunity.
|
||||
- We may sometimes compare the current situation to irrelevant *remote templates*.
|
||||
- <u>The extent to which our *gut feelings* represent intuition depends on our level of experience in the situation</u>.
|
||||
- Intuition also relies on generic *action scripts*, which are programmed decisions that shorten the decision-making process.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Making Choices More Effectively:**
|
||||
- Rely on logical analysis and not just intuition. They should be considered only in combination.
|
||||
- Revisit important problems and opportunities at later times so they are evaluated in different moods.
|
||||
- **Scenario Planning:** Disciplined process of thinking about alternative futures and how an organization should anticipate and react to them.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Evaluating Decisions:**
|
||||
- Decision makers engage in *confirmation bias* to support an implicit favorite.
|
||||
- **Postdecisional Justification:** When confirmation bias continues long after a decision has been made.
|
||||
- Decision makers ignore negative outcomes and overemphasize positive features.
|
||||
- Gives an excessively optimistic evaluation of decisions.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Escalation of Commitment:**
|
||||
> Tendency to repeat an apparently bad decision or to allocate more resources to a failing course of action.
|
||||
- **Main Influences:**
|
||||
- **Self-Justification Effect:**
|
||||
- *People try to convey a positive public image*.
|
||||
- This means that they are motivated to demonstrate that their choices will be successful, even when a decision is not having the desired outcomes.
|
||||
- A project's failure symbolizes the decision maker's incompetence.
|
||||
- **Self-Enhancement Effect:**
|
||||
- *People have a tendency to feel good about themselves*.
|
||||
- This supports a positive self-concept, but also increases the risk of escalation of commitment.
|
||||
- We continue to invest in a *failing project* because we overestimate the probability that we can rescue it.
|
||||
- Often occurs together with self-justification, but self-enhancement is non-conscious.
|
||||
- **Prospect Theory Effect:**
|
||||
> Tendency to experience stronger negative emotions when losing something of value than positive emotions when gaining something of equal value.
|
||||
- Also known as *loss aversion*.
|
||||
- Stronger motivation to avoid losses than to risk receiving equally valuable gains.
|
||||
- **Sunk Costs Effect:**
|
||||
- People feel motivated to invest more resources in projects that have *high sunk costs* (value of resources already invested).
|
||||
- This contrasts with rational choice, where investing resources should be determined by expected future gains, not the size of early investments.
|
||||
- A variation is *time investment* or *closing costs*.
|
||||
|
||||
- Under some circumstances, adding more resources to a failing project may be beneficial.
|
||||
- Many breakthroughs occur due to a decision maker's persistence and optimism.
|
||||
- May be prudent if cost overruns are relatively small compared to the project cost, the benefits of success are high, and rewards are received quickly.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Evaluating Decision Outcomes with Less Bias:**
|
||||
- Ensure that people who made the original decision are not the same people that later evaluate it.
|
||||
- Establish a preset level at which a decision is abandoned or reevaluated.
|
||||
- Seek factual and social feedback about the project.
|
||||
- Focus more on future opportunities to grow the business instead of the negative consequences of project failure.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**6.4 - Creativity**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Creativity:**
|
||||
> Development of original ideas that make a socially recognized contribution.
|
||||
- Allows us to imagine opportunities that are not easily apparent.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Creative Process Model:**
|
||||
|
||||
![[A012 - Creative Process.png | 600]]
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Preparation:**
|
||||
> Process of investigating the problem or opportunity.
|
||||
- Developing a clear understanding of what we want to achieve.
|
||||
- Studying information related to the topic.
|
||||
- *Developing knowledge and skills about the topic*.
|
||||
2. **Incubation:**
|
||||
> Period of reflective thought.
|
||||
- *Our mind works in the problem, on the background*.
|
||||
- Maintain a low-level awareness by frequently revisiting the problem.
|
||||
- **Divergent Thinking:** Re-framing a problem in a unique way and generating different approaches to it.
|
||||
3. **Illumination:**
|
||||
> Experience of suddenly becoming aware of a unique idea.
|
||||
- Presents ideas that are usually vague, roughly drawn, and untested.
|
||||
- Can be quickly lost if not documented.
|
||||
4. **Verification:**
|
||||
> Subject ideas to detailed experimentation and evaluation.
|
||||
- Ideas evolve into finished products or services.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Characteristics of Creative People:**
|
||||
- **Cognitive and Practical Intelligence:**
|
||||
- Synthesize, analyze, and apply ideas.
|
||||
- **Practical Intelligence:** Ability to evaluate potential usefulness of their ideas.
|
||||
- **Persistence:**
|
||||
- Based on a high need for achievement.
|
||||
- Strong task motivation.
|
||||
- Moderate or high self-esteem and optimism.
|
||||
- **Knowledge and Experience:**
|
||||
- Foundation of knowledge and experience.
|
||||
- *Double-Edged Sword*:
|
||||
- As individuals acquire more knowledge, their mental models tend to become more rigid.
|
||||
- They are less adaptable to new information.
|
||||
- Reduces the tendency to question *why things happen*.
|
||||
- **Independent Imagination:**
|
||||
- High openness to experience.
|
||||
- Low need for affiliation.
|
||||
- Strong self-direction and stimulation.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Organizational Conditions that Support Creativity:**
|
||||
- **Learning Orientation:**
|
||||
> Set of collective beliefs and norms that encourage people to question past practices, learn new ideas, experiment putting ideas into practice, and view mistakes as part of the learning process.
|
||||
- Task significance and autonomy contribute to creativity.
|
||||
- People are more creative when they believe their work improves the organization.
|
||||
- People are more creative when they have freedom to pursue novel ideas without bureaucratic delays.
|
||||
- Creativity blossoms through open communication and sufficient resources, as well as job security.
|
||||
- Nontraditional workspaces support creativity.
|
||||
- Creativity improves with support from leaders and coworkers.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Activities that Encourage Creativity:**
|
||||
- **Redefine the Problem:**
|
||||
- Revisit projects that have been set aside, so that they can be seen in new ways.
|
||||
- Ask coworkers unfamiliar with the issue to explore the problem.
|
||||
- Form new perspectives.
|
||||
- **Associative Play:**
|
||||
- Playing games or being challenged in unusual ways.
|
||||
- Engage in playful activities with unusual twists to traditional rules.
|
||||
- Challenge participants to create something new with a specific purpose using existing unrelated products.
|
||||
- Morphological Analysis -> Systematically investigating all combinations or characteristics of a product and looking at the feasibility of each.
|
||||
- **Cross-Pollination:**
|
||||
- When people of different areas exchange ideas or when new people are brought into an existing team.
|
||||
- *Creativity rarely occurs alone*.
|
||||
- **Design Thinking:**
|
||||
> Human-centered, solution-focused creative process that applies intuition and analytical thinking to clarify problems and generate solutions.
|
||||
- **Four Rules of Design Thinking:**
|
||||
- **Human Rule:** Need for collaboration and empathy with stakeholders.
|
||||
- **Ambiguity Rule:** Continually question possible solutions and avoid defining the problem too early.
|
||||
- **Re-Design Rule:** Understand and learn from past solutions and notice trends that may guide future steps.
|
||||
- **Tangible Rule:** Spend more time trying *low-cost prototypes* rather than analyzing ideas at a conceptual level.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**6.5 - Employee Involvement in Decision Making**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Employee Involvement:**
|
||||
> Situations in which employees participate and influence decisions about their organizations.
|
||||
- *Employees actually influence decisions, to some degree*.
|
||||
- *Low Level of Involvement* -> Employees are individually asked for information, but the problem is not described to them.
|
||||
- *High Level of Involvement* -> The problem is described and employees are asked for information, as well as giving them responsibility for developing recommendations.
|
||||
- *Highest Level of Involvement* -> The entire decision-making process is handed over to employees.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Benefits of Employee Involvement:**
|
||||
- Employee involvement potentially improves organizational decision making.
|
||||
- Improves identification of problems and opportunities.
|
||||
- Can improve the number and quality of solutions generated.
|
||||
- Under specific conditions, it improves the evaluation of alternatives.
|
||||
- Strengthens employee commitment to the decision.
|
||||
- *They feel personally responsible for its success*.
|
||||
- Has positive effects on motivation, satisfaction, and turnover.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Contingencies of Employee Involvement:**
|
||||
- *The optimal level of employee involvement depends on the situation*.
|
||||
- **Decision Structure:**
|
||||
- Programmed decisions are less likely to need employee involvement because they already worked out from past incidents.
|
||||
- **Source of Decision Knowledge:**
|
||||
- Subordinates should be involved in decision making when the leader lacks sufficient knowledge.
|
||||
- **Decision Commitment:**
|
||||
- Participation tends to improve employee commitment to the decision.
|
||||
- **Risk of Conflict:**
|
||||
- If employee goals conflict with organization goals, only a low level of involvement is advisable.
|
||||
- If conflict is likely to occur, high involvement is difficult to achieve.
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,543 @@
|
|||
> ### 007 - Conflict and Negotiation in the Workplace
|
||||
> Class Notes - September 28, 2023
|
||||
> Emilio Soriano Chávez
|
||||
> ***
|
||||
> <span style="color:#e74c3c">Organizational Behavior</span>
|
||||
> Spring 2023
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**7.0 - Video Lecture Notes**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Philosophical Approaches to Negotiation:**
|
||||
- **Distributive Negotiation (Bargaining):**
|
||||
- *Zero-sum gain* - *Every dollar I get is a dollar you do not get*.
|
||||
- *Fixed pie*.
|
||||
- Examples:
|
||||
- Buying a car.
|
||||
- **Integrative Negotiation (Negotiation):**
|
||||
- Potential to find a win-win situation.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Conflict Handling Slides:**
|
||||
- **Accommodating (Yielding):**
|
||||
- Seeing the other group get what they came for and sacrificing your own goals.
|
||||
- **Collaborating (Problem-Solving):**
|
||||
- High concern for both your party and the other party.
|
||||
- *Win-win space*.
|
||||
- People with high agreeableness and need of association.
|
||||
- **Avoiding:**
|
||||
- Not dealing with conflict at all.
|
||||
- **Competing (Forcing)**
|
||||
- Getting what you came for and not caring about the other.
|
||||
- More distributive.
|
||||
- People with low agreeableness and need of association.
|
||||
- **Compromising:**
|
||||
- Willing to pull a *little piece of everything*.
|
||||
|
||||
- Being high in most of these means you have *multiple tools in your toolkit*.
|
||||
- The highest one is the *default style*.
|
||||
- We can apply different styles in different situations.
|
||||
- Can also depend on your mood.
|
||||
|
||||
- It is helpful to know your default style.
|
||||
- We can adjust appropriately in each situation.
|
||||
- Can also help us to spot these styles in other people to help us understand and respond.
|
||||
- Helps us understand power dynamics.
|
||||
|
||||
- Be aware of your perceptions and attributions.
|
||||
- They drive your behavior in situations of conflict.
|
||||
- We do not know everything in a situation.
|
||||
- Tendency towards satisficing.
|
||||
- Be aware of anchoring/adjustment effects.
|
||||
- When someone throws a number at the beginning, it anchors the rest of the negotiation (we oscillate between it).
|
||||
- It can be beneficial to be the one who set sit (if we know) or, if we do not know, the other person.
|
||||
- Be aware of escalations of commitment.
|
||||
- We invest time and energy, and we do not want to walk away without an agreement.
|
||||
|
||||
- Be aware of cultural differences.
|
||||
- Conflict is differently handled across cultures.
|
||||
- Research the cultural norms and be transparent.
|
||||
|
||||
- **When Negotiating:**
|
||||
- **Determine the purpose of the negotiation:**
|
||||
- What do we want to accomplish?
|
||||
- What does the other person want to accomplish and what motivates them?
|
||||
- Helps us plan our strategy.
|
||||
- **Figure out what is actually negotiable:**
|
||||
- Is it just the price or are there other elements?
|
||||
- One example is a job offer.
|
||||
- Which do we care more (or less) about?
|
||||
- What are we willing *to give up*?
|
||||
- **What are your goals for the negotiation?**
|
||||
- What is your BATNA (Best Alternative to Negotiated Agreement)?
|
||||
- *If we do not do this, what is our next best option*.
|
||||
- Helps remind us that we can always walk away, and how will it look.
|
||||
- Defines what is our baseline (or ceiling).
|
||||
- Sets limits in what we are willing to accept.
|
||||
- Research what are your other options.
|
||||
- **Zone of Possible Agreement (ZOPA):**
|
||||
- If we know our BATNA and their BATNA we can define a ZOPA.
|
||||
- <u>Overlap of what we find acceptable and what the others find acceptable</u>.
|
||||
- Defines *where we are negotiating*.
|
||||
- The overlap needs to be positive in order for this to be a rational negotiation.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Irrational Negotiations:**
|
||||
- *People tend to make mediocre decisions when negotiating*.
|
||||
- They do not necessarily meet their goals.
|
||||
- Often, people have aversion to risk.
|
||||
- Escalation of commitment dias.
|
||||
- We want to leave with an agreement, even if we have to give *a little more that what I'm comfortable with*.
|
||||
- Relationship considerations.
|
||||
- We want to *come off well* and not unreasonably demanding.
|
||||
- Emotional appeals.
|
||||
- Lack of preparation or analysis.
|
||||
|
||||
- <u>Reaching an agreement does not always mean you achieved your stated goals</u>.
|
||||
- Simply means that the negotiation is over.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Negotiating your own Job Offer:**
|
||||
- Future jobs often ask for your previous salary.
|
||||
- They will be based in this value (sets the anchor point).
|
||||
- Studies show that those who negotiate their own salary get an average salary increase of about $5,000.
|
||||
- You have the most leverage at the very beginning (during the hiring job negotiation stage).
|
||||
- Figure out what is most important to you.
|
||||
- Outline your reasoning for these things.
|
||||
- Helps you defend for why you are asking these things.
|
||||
- Gather as most information as possible.
|
||||
- Go as an informed individual.
|
||||
- Decide on how you are going to negotiate.
|
||||
- Can be done via email.
|
||||
- Creates a *paper trail*.
|
||||
- **Common Mistakes:**
|
||||
- Not negotiating.
|
||||
- Revealing too much about what you are willing to accept.
|
||||
- Starting to negotiate prior to preparing a counter offer.
|
||||
- Do not negotiate until you have prepared this.
|
||||
- Inadequate research.
|
||||
- Negotiate as a package rather than each individual thing.
|
||||
- Ask for a final agreement in writing.
|
||||
- Make sure that there is an agreement.
|
||||
- Creates a paper trail.
|
||||
- **What is there to negotiate (as a package)?**
|
||||
- Base Salary
|
||||
- Bonuses
|
||||
- Variable Pay
|
||||
- Company Stock
|
||||
- Benefits:
|
||||
- Health and Life Insurance
|
||||
- Retirement Contributions
|
||||
- Location
|
||||
- Relocation Assistance Package
|
||||
- Vacation Time
|
||||
- Personal Days
|
||||
- Training or Education
|
||||
- Start Date
|
||||
- Travel Assignments
|
||||
- Job Title
|
||||
- Work from Home Arrangement
|
||||
- Mentor
|
||||
- Finding a way to justify what you want helps.
|
||||
- Increases the odds for compliance.
|
||||
- Mitigates the risk that someone will think you are inappropriate.
|
||||
- Offer a rationale.
|
||||
- Recognize that you do not have a lot of power initially.
|
||||
- Create a strategy.
|
||||
- Prepare a reasonable counter offer.
|
||||
- Provide justifications with standards.
|
||||
- Provide research you found.
|
||||
- First response should not be a counteroffer.
|
||||
- Should be around *What kind of this... Does this...*
|
||||
- Getting more information.
|
||||
- Once they respond to your questions do a counteroffer.
|
||||
- Better in email.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Takeaways:*
|
||||
- Multiple conflict-handling styles.
|
||||
- We are predisposed to some of them more than others.
|
||||
- They are a toolkit.
|
||||
- Most people can adapt.
|
||||
- There is a difference between integrative and distributive approach.
|
||||
- Sets a tone and determines conflict-handling style.
|
||||
- Determines how we make decisions.
|
||||
- Always negotiate a job offer.
|
||||
- What you were paid on your last job sets the base point moving forward.
|
||||
- Be thoughtful about what you want.
|
||||
- There is more on the table than just salary.
|
||||
- Be strategic, thoughtful, and polite.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**7.1 - Meaning and Consequences of Conflict**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Conflict:**
|
||||
> Process in which one party perceives that its interests are being opposed or affected by another party.
|
||||
- Based on perceptions, when one party *believes* that another may obstruct its efforts.
|
||||
- **Interpersonal Conflict:** Conflict that occurs when our behavior conflicts with our beliefs and values.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Conflict-Is-Bad Perspective:**
|
||||
- The dominant view is that *conflict is dysfunctional*.
|
||||
- Organizations work better through harmonious relations.
|
||||
- This view is now considered *too simplistic*.
|
||||
|
||||
- Conflict potentially threatens personal needs and self-concept.
|
||||
- This reduces job satisfaction and increases stress and turnover.
|
||||
- Also, it undermines job performance, as it consumes otherwise productive time.
|
||||
|
||||
- Conflict can undermine information sharing.
|
||||
- Employees will be less motivated to ask and transmit information with *discordant* coworkers.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Benefits of Conflict (Optimal Conflict Perspective):**
|
||||
- Potentially improves decision making by energizing individuals to debate issues and evaluate alternatives.
|
||||
- Motivates creative thinking to discover novel solutions to disagreements.
|
||||
- Maintains vigilance with the external environment.
|
||||
- Employees engage in active thinking and ongoing questioning about the organization.
|
||||
- People tend to be more motivated to work together when faced with an external threat.
|
||||
- Strengthens cohesion within the team.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**7.2 - Task and Relationship Conflict**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Types of Conflict:**
|
||||
- **Task Conflict:**
|
||||
> Type of conflict in which people focus their discussion around the issue (*task*) in which different views occur, while showing respect for people involved.
|
||||
- Also called **constructive conflict**.
|
||||
- *Keeps the spotlight on the qualities of the ideas presented*.
|
||||
- Individuals examine ideas in terms of accuracy, logic, and reasonable inferences.
|
||||
- <u>Tends to produce beneficial outcomes</u>.
|
||||
- Better decision making.
|
||||
- *Almost all workplace conflicts can be framed as task conflicts*.
|
||||
- **Relationship Conflict:**
|
||||
> Type of conflict in which people focus their discussion on qualities of the people in dispute, rather than on the qualities of the ideas presented.
|
||||
- *One party attacks another by questioning the competence of those opponents*.
|
||||
- Attempts to dismiss ideas by arguing that they were proposed by people who lack virtuous characteristics.
|
||||
- Occurs indirectly when people rely on status or experience to defend their position.
|
||||
- <u>It is dysfunctional, as it threatens the other party's self-esteem</u>.
|
||||
- Triggers defensive mechanisms.
|
||||
- Reduces mutual trust by emphasizing interpersonal differences.
|
||||
- Adversaries become less motivated to communicate and share information.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Minimizing Relationship Conflict:**
|
||||
- **Emotional Intelligence:**
|
||||
- <u>Relationship conflict is less likely to occur when team members have high emotional intelligence</u> and related attributes (emotional stability, self-control).
|
||||
- Understand and regulate emotions during debate.
|
||||
- View a coworker's emotional reaction as valuable information rather than as a personal attack.
|
||||
- **Team Development:**
|
||||
- <u>As teams develop, members become better at understanding and anticipating one another, reducing the risk that actions are misinterpreted as conflict triggers</u>.
|
||||
- Produces higher team cohesion, so members are motivated to minimize relationship conflict, as it threatens stability.
|
||||
- **Norms Supporting Psychological Safety:**
|
||||
- **Psychological Safety:** Shared belief that it is safe to engage in interpersonal risk-taking.
|
||||
- Employees are confident that presenting unusual ideas, constructively disagreeing, or experimenting with new behaviors will not cause coworkers to threaten them.
|
||||
- Organizational norms that encourage employees to respect and value one another.
|
||||
- <u>Display positive emotions and nonthreatening behavior when discussing different points of view</u>.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**3.3 - Conflict Process Model**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Model of the Conflict Process:**
|
||||
|
||||
![[A013 - Conflict Process Model.png | 650]]
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Sources of Conflict:**
|
||||
- Lead one or both parties to perceive that conflict exists.
|
||||
- Becoming aware that a party's statements or actions interfere with their own goals or beliefs.
|
||||
2. **Conflict Perceptions and Emotions:**
|
||||
- Usually, these perceptions produce negative emotions (stress, anxiety, fear, frustration, anger).
|
||||
- Some people experience positive emotions.
|
||||
- *Cognitive reappraisal of the conflict*.
|
||||
- Perceiving the situation as a positive challenge.
|
||||
- Relief that concerns about a possible conflict can now be addressed.
|
||||
3. **Manifest Conflict:**
|
||||
- **Conflict Episodes:** Represent each party's decisions and behaviors toward the other.
|
||||
- Influenced by how the other party perceives and reacts emotionally to them.
|
||||
- Also revealed by the style each style prefers to resolve the conflict.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Sources of Conflict in Organizations:**
|
||||
- **Incompatible Goals:**
|
||||
> Occurs when the goals of one department seem to interfere with another department's goals.
|
||||
- Organizations divide work among departments and teams, who divide it further among individuals.
|
||||
- Each division has associated goals.
|
||||
- <u>Employees and departments have different (sometimes conflicting) work objectives</u>.
|
||||
- **Differentiation:**
|
||||
> Differences among work units regarding beliefs, values, experiences, and preferences.
|
||||
- *Two departments may agree on a common goal, but have different beliefs about how to achieve it*.
|
||||
- Generational diversity produces conflict.
|
||||
- Broad age groups tend to have different needs, expectations, and behaviors.
|
||||
- Occurs due to unique technological advances, economic conditions, and other *social forces*.
|
||||
- We also have different needs and priorities at each stage of our career and life.
|
||||
- Also exists during mergers or acquisitions.
|
||||
- People fight over the *right way* to do things.
|
||||
- **Interdependence:**
|
||||
> When employees must share resources or coordinate work activities to perform their jobs.
|
||||
- All conflict in the workplace is caused (to some extent) by *task interdependence*.
|
||||
- Conflict is not possible if two work units do not have any involvement or resource sharing.
|
||||
- Probability and intensity increases with the level of interdependence.
|
||||
- Higher in *sequential interdependence work relationships* (like an assembly line).
|
||||
- Highest in *reciprocal interdependence situations*, where employees quickly and significantly affect each other.
|
||||
- Usually lowest when working with others in a *pooled interdependence relationship* (sharing a common resource).
|
||||
- **Scarce Resources:**
|
||||
> When a department requiring a resource necessarily interferes with others who also need that resource to fulfill their goals.
|
||||
- Budget deliberations produce conflict, as there is not enough cash flow to satisfy funding aspirations of each unit.
|
||||
- **Ambiguous Rules:**
|
||||
> When rules are ambiguous, inconsistently enforced, or completely missing.
|
||||
- Increases the risk that one party will interfere with another party's goals.
|
||||
- Encourages political tactics.
|
||||
- When clear rules exist, employees know what to expect from one another and usually abide by those rules.
|
||||
- **Communication Problems:**
|
||||
> Dysfunctional communication that occurs when employees lack the ability or motivation to state their disagreement in a diplomatic manner.
|
||||
- Employees tend to use emotional language and aggressive nonverbal behavior (influenced by their strong feelings).
|
||||
- The stronger the language, the stronger the perception that conflict not only exists, but is a high risk threat.
|
||||
- Receivers usually have a similar response, which escalates the conflict.
|
||||
- This fuels relationship conflict.
|
||||
- Lack of communication amplifies the conflict.
|
||||
- Employees may not have the opportunity to discuss their differences.
|
||||
- Parties actively avoid each other if relationship is very uncomfortable.
|
||||
- Each side increasingly relies on distorted images and stereotypes of the other party.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**7.4 - Interpersonal Conflict-Handling Styles**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Conflict-Handling Styles:**
|
||||
|
||||
![[A014 - Conflict Handling Styles.png | 500]]
|
||||
|
||||
- **Problem-Solving:**
|
||||
> Attempts to find a solution that is beneficial for both parties.
|
||||
- Known as the **win-win orientation**, where resources at stake are *expandable* rather than fixed if the parties work together.
|
||||
- *Both parties collaborate to identify solutions that satisfy everyone involved*.
|
||||
- **Forcing:**
|
||||
> Try to win the conflict at the other's expense.
|
||||
- Knows as the **win-lose orientation**, where people believe that the parties are drawing from a *fixed pie*, so the more one receives, the less others receive.
|
||||
- Relies on influence tactics to get one's own way.
|
||||
- Does not necessarily involve aggressiveness or bullying.
|
||||
- Includes moderate degrees of assertiveness.
|
||||
- **Avoiding:**
|
||||
> Try to *smooth over* or evade conflict situations altogether.
|
||||
- For example, *steer clear of coworkers associated with the conflict*, or *minimize discussion of the topic*.
|
||||
- **Yielding:**
|
||||
> *Giving in* completely to the other side's wishes, or giving little to no attention to your own interests.
|
||||
- *Offering help with no expectation that the other party needs to reciprocate*.
|
||||
- **Compromising:**
|
||||
> Actively seeking a middle ground between the interests of two parties.
|
||||
- Involves calculating losses from concessions with equally valued gains.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!INFO] The best conflict-handling style depends on the situation.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Problem Solving:**
|
||||
- **Advantages:**
|
||||
- Offers the best chance for conflicting parties to reach a solution closest to their needs and goals.
|
||||
- Tends to improve long-term relationships, reduce stress, and minimize defensiveness.
|
||||
- **Disadvantages:**
|
||||
- If a conflict is simple and perfectly opposing, *problem solving* will waste time and increase frustration.
|
||||
- Takes more time and a high degree of trust.
|
||||
- Risk that the other party will take advantage of the information shared.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Forcing Style:**
|
||||
- **Advantages:**
|
||||
- Appropriate when a dispute requires a quick solution, or when one's ideas have a stronger logical or moral foundation.
|
||||
- Preferred when the other party would take advantage of a more cooperative style.
|
||||
- **Disadvantages:**
|
||||
- Tends to generate relationship conflict more quickly or intensely.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Avoiding:**
|
||||
- **Advantages:**
|
||||
- Can be the best *short-term* strategy when a conflict becomes emotionally charged.
|
||||
- **Disadvantages:**
|
||||
- Often ineffective, as it produces uncertainty and frustration rather than resolution.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Yielding:**
|
||||
- **Advantages:**
|
||||
- Appropriate when the other party has more power or the issue is not as important to you.
|
||||
- **Disadvantages:**
|
||||
- May give the other party an unrealistically high expectation and motivate them to seek more from you.
|
||||
- May produce more conflict on the long run.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Compromising:**
|
||||
- **Advantages:**
|
||||
- Best when the conflict is simple and perfectly opposing.
|
||||
- Necessary when parties lack time, trust, and openness.
|
||||
- Popular when parties prioritize harmony over personal gains.
|
||||
- Prevents one party from gaining advantage over another, when both parties have approximately equal power.
|
||||
- **Disadvantages:**
|
||||
- Settles for a sub-optimal solution.
|
||||
- Employees are *less happy* with compromise agreements.
|
||||
|
||||
- Preferred conflict-handling styles vary across cultures.
|
||||
- Cultural values and norms are the main influence.
|
||||
- *High collectivist cultures* are motivated to maintain harmonious relations.
|
||||
- They are more likely to manage conflicts by avoidance or problem solving.
|
||||
|
||||
- Men are more likely than women to use the forcing style.
|
||||
- Women are more likely than men to use the avoiding style.
|
||||
- They are also slightly more likely to use problem solving, compromising, and yielding than men.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**7.5 - Structural Approaches to Conflict Management**
|
||||
|
||||
- Conflict management involves altering the underlying structural causes of potential conflict.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Structural Approaches to Minimize Conflict:**
|
||||
- **Emphasize Superordinate Goals:**
|
||||
- Increase the parties' commitment to superordinate goals and decrease importance of conflicting subordinate goals.
|
||||
- **Superordinate Goals:** Goals that conflicting departments value and whose attainment requires joint resources.
|
||||
- These goals are *higher-order aspirations* rather than work unit goals or individual objectives.
|
||||
- Effective teams frame decisions as superordinate goals that rise above each department's goals.
|
||||
- Effective leaders reduce conflict through a vision that unifies employees.
|
||||
- This makes them less preoccupied with their subordinate goal differences.
|
||||
- **Reduce Differentiation:**
|
||||
- Reducing differentiation reduces dysfunctional conflict.
|
||||
- As employees develop and recognize more similarities than differences with coworkers in other departments, they increase their trust.
|
||||
- They will be more willing to resolve disputes through constructive discussion.
|
||||
- **Strategies:**
|
||||
- Have meaningful interaction between employees of different groups.
|
||||
- Rotate staff to different departments or regions throughout their career.
|
||||
- Build and maintain a string organizational culture.
|
||||
- **Improve Communication and Mutual Understanding:**
|
||||
- Give conflicting parties more opportunities to communicate and understand each other.
|
||||
- This creates better awareness of and respect for one another.
|
||||
- Should only be applied to groups with moderate or low differentiation.
|
||||
- People in some cultures may feel uncomfortable with resolving differences through direct and open dialogue.
|
||||
- **Strategies:**
|
||||
- Change physical or reporting arrangements so employees have more opportunities to interact with one another.
|
||||
- Disclose information about oneself and self-perceptions, as well as feedback to others about how they are perceived.
|
||||
- *Intergroup Mirroring* -> Conflicting groups document their perceptions and discusses them with the other group.
|
||||
1. How the group perceives itself.
|
||||
2. How it perceives the other group.
|
||||
3. How the group believes it is perceived by the other group.
|
||||
- **Reduce Interdependence:**
|
||||
- Minimizing the level of interdependence among parties reduces dysfunctional conflict.
|
||||
- **Strategies:**
|
||||
- **Create Buffers:**
|
||||
- Mechanisms that loosen the coupling between two or more units.
|
||||
- Reduces the effect of one party on the other.
|
||||
- **Use Integrators:**
|
||||
- Employees who coordinate activities of multiple work units.
|
||||
- Reduces the amount of direct interaction required between units.
|
||||
- Integrators rarely have authority over the departments, so they must rely on referent power and persuasion.
|
||||
- **Combine Jobs:**
|
||||
- Form of job enrichment to reduce task interdependence.
|
||||
- Employees will have a pooled form of task interdependence.
|
||||
- Likelihood of conflict is reduced.
|
||||
- **Increase Resources:**
|
||||
- Increasing resources reduces sources of conflicts.
|
||||
- Not feasible due to costs involved.
|
||||
- **Clarify Rules and Procedures:**
|
||||
- Establishing clear rules and procedures.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Third-Party Conflict Resolution:**
|
||||
> Any attempt by a *relatively neutral person* to help conflicting parties resolve their differences.
|
||||
- **Main Dispute Resolution Activities:**
|
||||
- **Arbitration:**
|
||||
- Arbitrators have high control over final decisions, but low control over the process.
|
||||
- Used by executives, who follow previously agreed rules, listen to arguments, and make a binding decision.
|
||||
- **Inquisition:**
|
||||
- Inquisitors control all discussion about the conflict.
|
||||
- Has high decision control, as it chooses the form of conflict resolution.
|
||||
- Has high process control, as inquisitors choose which information to examine and how to examine.
|
||||
- **Mediation:**
|
||||
- Mediators have high control over the intervention process.
|
||||
- Manage the process and context of interaction.
|
||||
- Conflicting parties make the final decision about how to resolve their differences.
|
||||
|
||||
- Managers usually adopt an *inquisitional approach*.
|
||||
- They dominate the process and make a binding decision.
|
||||
- Gives them control over the process and outcome.
|
||||
- Resolves disputes efficiently.
|
||||
|
||||
- Inquisition is the least effective method in organizational settings.
|
||||
- Leaders tend to collect limited information about the problem.
|
||||
- Decisions may produce an ineffective solution.
|
||||
- Employees view such process as unfair because they have little control.
|
||||
|
||||
- For everyday disagreements, mediation is the best approach.
|
||||
- Gives workers more responsibility for solving their disputes.
|
||||
- Third-party only establishes an appropriate context.
|
||||
- Offers the highest level of employee satisfaction.
|
||||
|
||||
- Arbitration is used when mediation cannot resolve differences.
|
||||
- Predetermined rules create a higher sense of procedural justice.
|
||||
- Preferred when organization's goals should take priority over individual goals.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**7.6 - Resolving Conflict Through Negotiation**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Negotiation:**
|
||||
> Process in which interdependent parties with divergent goals attempt to reach agreements on issues that mutually affect them.
|
||||
- People negotiate when they need to work together, need to reach a consensus on decisions, and initially do not have identical preferences.
|
||||
- Negotiation skills help achieve goals, reduce conflict, and built collaborative relationships.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Distributive Approach:**
|
||||
> The negotiator believes that those involved in the conflict must distribute portions from a fixed pie.
|
||||
- It is a **win-lose** orientation.
|
||||
- More common when there is only one item to resolve.
|
||||
- **Integrative (Mutual Gains) Approach:**
|
||||
> The negotiator believes the resources at stake are expandable rather than fixed, if parties work together to find a solution.
|
||||
- It is a **win-win** orientation.
|
||||
- More common when multiple issues are open for discussion.
|
||||
- More opportunity for mutual gains.
|
||||
- Each issue has different value to each party.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Preparing to Negotiate:**
|
||||
- **Develop Goals and Understand Needs:**
|
||||
- *Goals* about what you want to achieve from the exchange.
|
||||
- *Needs* that you are trying to fulfill from the goals.
|
||||
- Specific needs can be satisfied by different goals.
|
||||
- Effective negotiators try to understand their own needs and avoid becoming locked into fixed goals.
|
||||
- Anticipate the other party's goals and their underlying needs.
|
||||
- **Bargain Zone Model of Negotiations:**
|
||||
- **Initial Offer Point:**
|
||||
- *Each party's opening offer to the other side*.
|
||||
- Must be carefully considered, it can influence the outcome.
|
||||
- A high initial offer can keep the outcome closer to your target point.
|
||||
- If the offer is set to high, it can break off negotiations or damage trust.
|
||||
- **Target Point:**
|
||||
- Realistic goal or expectation for a final agreement.
|
||||
- Consider alternative strategies to reach the objectives.
|
||||
- Setting high, specific target points results in better outcomes.
|
||||
- **Resistance Point:**
|
||||
- Point beyond which you will make no further concessions, and instead, walk away from the negotiations.
|
||||
- Determined by comparison of how goals and needs may be achieved by other means.
|
||||
- **Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement (BATNA):**
|
||||
- Represents the estimated cost of walking away from the negotiation.
|
||||
- If people outside of the current negotiation are willing to negotiate and provide a reasonable agreement, you have a high BATNA (low cost to walk away from the current negotiation).
|
||||
- People tend to overestimate their BATNA.
|
||||
- Wrong belief that there are plenty of other ways to achieve their objective.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Negotiation Process:**
|
||||
- **Gather Information:**
|
||||
- Helps discover the other party's needs hidden behind their offers and goals.
|
||||
- Can reveal the other party's resistance point.
|
||||
- Can potentially transform distributive negotiations into integrative ones by discovering multiple dimensions not previously considered.
|
||||
- <u>More important in integrative negotiations, as parties require knowledge of each other's needs to discover solutions that maximize benefit for both</u>.
|
||||
- One effective strategy is **mirroring**, where you repeat back as a question the last few words of what the other person says.
|
||||
- Inexperienced negotiators mainly talk about their arguments and justifications.
|
||||
- Skilled negotiators spend most of the time listening to the other party and asking for details.
|
||||
- **Manage Concessions:**
|
||||
- **Concession:**
|
||||
> One party's revision of a negotiating position so it comes closer to the other party's current position.
|
||||
- Successful negotiators make fewer concessions, and each of these is smaller than average.
|
||||
- Concessions signal to the other party the importance of each issue.
|
||||
- They symbolize each party's motivation to bargain in good faith.
|
||||
- Each party reciprocates when the other makes a concession.
|
||||
- Need to be clearly labeled.
|
||||
- Should be offered in installments.
|
||||
- **Manage Time:**
|
||||
- Negotiators make more concessions as the deadline gets closer.
|
||||
- This can be a liability if you are under time pressure.
|
||||
- Can also be an advantage if the other party is under time pressure.
|
||||
- Negotiators with more power sometimes apply time pressure through an *exploding offer*, giving the opponent a very short time to accept it.
|
||||
- Frequently found in customer sales and some job offers.
|
||||
- **Building the Relationship:**
|
||||
- Building and maintaining trust is important for keeping the parties focused on the issue rather than personalities.
|
||||
- It also motivates information sharing.
|
||||
- Can be done by discovering common backgrounds and interests with the other party.
|
||||
- Trust is higher when team members closely match the backgrounds of the other party.
|
||||
- First impressions are important, as people form beliefs and emotions in a fraction of a second.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Negotiation Setting:**
|
||||
- <u>The effectiveness of negotiating can depends on the environment in which the negotiations occur</u>.
|
||||
- It is easier to negotiate on your own place.
|
||||
- You are familiar with the environment.
|
||||
- No need to cope with travel stress or depend on others for resources.
|
||||
- Many negotiators agree to neutral territory.
|
||||
- Most negotiators have audiences.
|
||||
- Negotiators tend to act differently when an audience observes the negotiation.
|
||||
- They tend to be more competitive, less willing to make concessions, and more likely to engage in assertive tactics.
|
||||
- *Show that the negotiator is working for the benefits of the audience*.
|
480
12 - Fall 2023/Organizational Behavior/008 - Team Dynamics.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,480 @@
|
|||
> ### 008 - Team Dynamics
|
||||
> Class Notes - October 15, 2023
|
||||
> Emilio Soriano Chávez
|
||||
> ***
|
||||
> <span style="color:#e74c3c">Organizational Behavior</span>
|
||||
> Spring 2023
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**8.0 - Video Lecture Notes**
|
||||
|
||||
- Teams and groups are different.
|
||||
- **Group:**
|
||||
- Two or more people doing something.
|
||||
- Not necessarily interdependent.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Team:**
|
||||
- Has a common goal.
|
||||
- They exist to fill a common purpose.
|
||||
- It is interdependent, there has to be collaboration.
|
||||
- Regular interaction.
|
||||
- Members need to influence each other (social influence or norms).
|
||||
- People need to perceive the group as a team.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Five Stage Model of Group Development (Tuckman's Group Development Model):**
|
||||
- **Forming:**
|
||||
- Acknowledge that you have a common task.
|
||||
- **Storming:**
|
||||
- *Feel each other out*.
|
||||
- Figure out power dynamics, experiences, and interactions.
|
||||
- How to interact and handle conflict.
|
||||
- Can be *uncomfortable*, as people do not know how to react.
|
||||
- Figuring out your role and the norms of the group.
|
||||
- **Norming:**
|
||||
- Figuring out social norms on how members will do their work.
|
||||
- **Performing**
|
||||
- Do the task.
|
||||
- **Adjourn**
|
||||
- Disband team.
|
||||
|
||||
- Adding new people to an existing team may cause to return to the storming stage.
|
||||
- Addition of new embers changes the group norms.
|
||||
|
||||
- A group will not develop strong norms, but a team will.
|
||||
- Team members need to influence each other.
|
||||
- Differentiation happens in the norming phase.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Advantages of Teams:**
|
||||
- Motivation
|
||||
- Socially obligated towards people.
|
||||
- People are observed and tend to perform better.
|
||||
- There is a high potential for effective problem solving.
|
||||
- More perspectives and knowledge.
|
||||
- Challenging assumptions or bring novel information.
|
||||
- Especially needed when looking for creative solutions.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Disadvantages of Teams:**
|
||||
- Potential for social conflict.
|
||||
- Slower than individual work.
|
||||
- *Convincing other people*.
|
||||
- Social Loafing - *Freeloader* people who rely on the effort of the rest of the group rather than their own work.
|
||||
- Groupthink - No diversity of perspective.
|
||||
- Everyone is focused on getting along so no one challenges assumptions or suggesting contrary viewpoints.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Process Losses:**
|
||||
> Occur when resources are spent on something other than the task itself, like team dependence or maintenance.
|
||||
- Sometimes they can be functional.
|
||||
- In the forming stage.
|
||||
- Helps develop a shared sense of understanding and social cohesion.
|
||||
- Often, they are not functional.
|
||||
|
||||
- All biases and heuristics are still present in group and team decision-making.
|
||||
- In groups, there is the potential for another member to catch it.
|
||||
|
||||
- More perspectives mean more potential to deal with less rational elements.
|
||||
- Social pressures may still drive teams to these less rational elements.
|
||||
|
||||
- All teams are groups, but not all groups are teams.
|
||||
- Teams naturally go through conflict and disagreement.
|
||||
- How we handle the conflict in he storming stage determines effectiveness.
|
||||
|
||||
- Process losses occur in any group.
|
||||
- Some serve a purpose.
|
||||
- Some are counterproductive.
|
||||
- Do not contribute to the functioning of the group.
|
||||
|
||||
- Maximize process gains.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**8.1 - Teams and Informal Groups**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Teams:**
|
||||
> Groups of two or more people that:
|
||||
> - Interact and influence each other.
|
||||
> - Are mutually accountable for achieving common goals.
|
||||
> - Perceive themselves as a social entity.
|
||||
- <u>All teams exist to fulfill some purpose</u>.
|
||||
- Teams are held together by their interdependence and need for collaboration.
|
||||
- All teams require some form of communication to coordinate, share information, and develop a common mindset.
|
||||
- Team members can influence each other.
|
||||
- Some members may be more influential than others.
|
||||
- Teams *feel connected* through a common interest or purpose.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Characteristics of a Team:**
|
||||
- **Team Permanence:**
|
||||
- *How long does a type of team usually exist*.
|
||||
- **Skill Diversity:**
|
||||
- High skill diversity means team members posses different skills and knowledge.
|
||||
- Low skill diversity means members have similar abilities and are interchangeable.
|
||||
- **Authority Dispersion:**
|
||||
- The degree that decision-making responsibility is distributed throughout the team (high dispersion) or vested in one or few members (low dispersion).
|
||||
|
||||
- **Informal Groups:**
|
||||
> People assembled together, whether or not they have any interdependence or organizational objective.
|
||||
- They exist primarily for the benefit of their members.
|
||||
- <u>All teams are groups, but many do not satisfy the definition of teams</u>.
|
||||
- **Reasons for Informal Groups:**
|
||||
- Human beings are social animals.
|
||||
- Social Identity Theory -> Individuals define themselves by their group affiliations.
|
||||
- To accomplish personal objectives that cannot be achieved alone.
|
||||
- We are comforted by the mere presence of other people.
|
||||
|
||||
- Informal groups potentially minimize employee stress.
|
||||
- They provide emotional and informational support.
|
||||
- This improves employee well-being and increases organizational effectiveness.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Social Networks:**
|
||||
> Social structures of individuals that are connected to each other through some form of interdependence.
|
||||
|
||||
- Employees with a strong informal network have more power and influence.
|
||||
- They receive better information and preferential treatment from others.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**8.2 - Benefits and Limitations of Teams**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Benefits of Teams:**
|
||||
- Teams make better decisions, develop better products, and create a more engaged workforce.
|
||||
- Teams can quickly share information and coordinate tasks.
|
||||
- They provide better customer service as they offer a greater breadth of knowledge.
|
||||
- Members are more motivated than when working alone.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Motivation Forces of Teams:**
|
||||
1. Employees have a **drive to bond** and are motivated to fulfill the goals of groups to which they belong.
|
||||
2. Employees have a **high accountability** to other team members.
|
||||
3. Each team member creates a **moving performance standard** for the others.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Disadvantages of Teams:**
|
||||
- **Process Losses:**
|
||||
> Resources (including time and energy) spent toward team development and maintenance rather than the task.
|
||||
- Teams need time and effort to:
|
||||
- Develop mutual goal understanding.
|
||||
- Determine the best strategy to accomplish goals.
|
||||
- Negotiate specific team roles.
|
||||
- Agree on informal rules of conduct.
|
||||
- Resolve disagreements.
|
||||
- Process losses can make a team less effective than an individual working alone.
|
||||
- They usually increase with team diversity and size.
|
||||
- Diverse teams have a range of beliefs and values that slow development.
|
||||
- Conflicts take longer to resolve.
|
||||
- Larger teams have higher process losses as working with many people is more difficult.
|
||||
- More time is required for each member to be involved.
|
||||
- Process losses are amplified when adding new members to an existing team.
|
||||
- New team members take time and effort to figure out how to work well with others.
|
||||
- **Brook's Law:**
|
||||
> Adding more people to a late software project only makes it later.
|
||||
- **Social Loafing:**
|
||||
> Problem that occurs when people exert less effort when working in teams than when working alone.
|
||||
- More likely to occur when individual performance is hidden or difficult to distinguish.
|
||||
- Less visible in large teams.
|
||||
- Hidden when the team produces a single output rather than separate outputs for each member.
|
||||
- More common when the work is boring or there is low task significance.
|
||||
- More prevalent among team members with low conscientiousness and low agreeableness.
|
||||
- More widespread when employees are not motivated to help the team achieve its goals.
|
||||
- Members have low social identity.
|
||||
- *Social loafers provide only as much effort as they believe others will provide*. (Maintaining Equity)
|
||||
- Employees believe they have little control over the team's success.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**8.3 - Model of Team Effectiveness**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Team Effectiveness:**
|
||||
- <u>A team is effective when it benefits the organization and its members, and survives long enough to accomplish its mandate</u>.
|
||||
- Teams exist to fulfill a purpose, so effectiveness is measured by achieving that objective.
|
||||
- A team's effectiveness also relies on the satisfaction and well-being of its members.
|
||||
- People join groups to fulfill their personal needs.
|
||||
- Team effectiveness includes the ability and motivation of its members to remain together *long enough* to accomplish the assigned goals.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Team Effectiveness Model:**
|
||||
|
||||
![[A015 - Team Effectiveness Model.png | 600]]
|
||||
|
||||
- **Organizational and Team Environment:**
|
||||
> Represents all conditions surrounding the team that influence its effectiveness.
|
||||
- Teams thrive when:
|
||||
- The physical workspace encourages collaborative interaction.
|
||||
- Information systems support team coordination.
|
||||
- Leaders instill a culture of teamwork.
|
||||
- Reward system reinforces collaboration rather than competition.
|
||||
- Team effectiveness benefits from an organizational structure that:
|
||||
- Clusters activities within the team.
|
||||
- Creates distinct boundaries between other work units.
|
||||
- **Team Design:**
|
||||
> Variables that are assigned to the team when it is created, and altered throughout its existence.
|
||||
- **Task Characteristics:**
|
||||
- Teams are more effective than individuals in specific types of tasks.
|
||||
- Better for work that is too complex for an individual to perform.
|
||||
- *Complex work requires skills and knowledge beyond a person's abilities*.
|
||||
- Teams perform better when the work is **well structured** and **predictable**, rather than ambiguous and unpredictable.
|
||||
- Low task variability.
|
||||
- High task analyzability.
|
||||
- Ambiguous and unpredictable tasks are more difficult to coordinate, leading to more process losses and errors.
|
||||
- **Task Interdependence:**
|
||||
> Extent to which team members must share materials, information, or expertise in order to perform their jobs.
|
||||
- **Levels of Task Interdependence:**
|
||||
|
||||
![[A016 - Task Interdependence.png | 500]]
|
||||
|
||||
- **Pooled Interdependence:** When a work unit shares common (*pooled*) resources, but otherwise operates independently.
|
||||
- **Sequential Interdependence** When the output of one work unit becomes the input for another unit.
|
||||
- **Reciprocal Interdependence:** When work output is exchanged back and forth among work units.
|
||||
- <u>The higher the level of task interdependence, the greater the need to organize people into teams</u>.
|
||||
- This is because it requires more intense coordination.
|
||||
- Teams enable better interpersonal communication than working independently.
|
||||
- <u>Employees should be formed into teams only when they have the same task goals</u>.
|
||||
- If not, it may lead to dysfunctional conflict.
|
||||
- **Team Size:**
|
||||
> Teams need to be large enough to accomplish the assigned work, yet small enough to maintain efficient coordination and meaningful involvement of each member.
|
||||
- Ideal team size varies with the type of team, the tasks to perform, and the available forms of coordination.
|
||||
- *Smaller teams operate more effectively than larger teams*.
|
||||
- Members also feel more engaged because they have more influence and feel more responsible.
|
||||
- Members get to know one another better, improving trust.
|
||||
- **Team Composition:**
|
||||
- <u>Team effectiveness depends on the qualities of the members of the team</u>.
|
||||
- Team performance depends on how well its members engage in **taskwork** (performing task-related behaviors).
|
||||
- This requires having task motivation, required abilities, and clear role perceptions.
|
||||
- Effective teams need members who engage in **teamwork** behaviors.
|
||||
- **Most Frequent Teamwork Behaviors (Five Cs):**
|
||||
|
||||
![[A017 - Teamwork Behaviors.png | 400]]
|
||||
|
||||
- **Team Diversity:**
|
||||
- **Advantages of Diverse Teams:**
|
||||
- People from different backgrounds see a problem from different angles.
|
||||
- Broader pool of technical abilities.
|
||||
- Better representation of the team's constituents.
|
||||
- **Disadvantages of Diverse Teams:**
|
||||
- Employees with diverse backgrounds take longer to become a high-performing team.
|
||||
- Slower team development process.
|
||||
- **Faultlines:** *Hypothetical* dividing lines that may split a team into subgroups along gender, ethnic, professional, or other dimensions.
|
||||
- Undermine effectiveness by reducing motivation to communicate with others on the other side of the divisions.
|
||||
- Homogeneous teams tend to be more effective in tasks with a high degree of cooperation and coordination.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**8.4 - Team Processes**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Team Processes:**
|
||||
> Cognitive and emotional dynamics of a team that continually change with its development.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Team Development:**
|
||||
- Team members resolve several issues and pass through several stages of development before becoming an effective work unit.
|
||||
- **Stages of Team Development:**
|
||||
1. **Forming:**
|
||||
- Period of testing and orientation.
|
||||
- Team members learn about each other.
|
||||
- Evaluation of benefits and costs of membership.
|
||||
- People tend to be polite and defer to authority.
|
||||
2. **Storming:**
|
||||
- Interpersonal conflict occurs as members become more proactive and compete for team roles.
|
||||
- Members try to establish norms of behavior and performance standards.
|
||||
3. **Norming:**
|
||||
- Team develops its first sense of cohesion.
|
||||
- Roles are established.
|
||||
- Consensus is formed around objectives and team-based mental models.
|
||||
4. **Performing:**
|
||||
- Team members have learned to efficiently coordinate and resolve conflicts.
|
||||
- Members are highly cooperative and have a high level of trust among one another.
|
||||
5. **Adjourning:**
|
||||
- Occurs when the team is about to disband.
|
||||
- Team members shift their attention away from task orientation to a relationship focus.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Team Norms:**
|
||||
> Informal rules and shared expectations established to regulate member behavior.
|
||||
- <u>Norms exist only for behaviors that are important to the team</u>.
|
||||
- They are developed during the storming stage.
|
||||
- Most norms develop when members associate behaviors with the team's performance or well-being.
|
||||
- Some norms originate from a critical incident, others are brought due to past experiences.
|
||||
- Norms develop because they improve predictability and conflict-avoidance in coworker relations.
|
||||
- Team norms are enforced and directly reinforced through praise and easier access to valued resources.
|
||||
- **Managing Team Norms:**
|
||||
- Select team members whose values and past behavior are compatible with norms.
|
||||
- Clearly state the norms to assigned people.
|
||||
- Introduce desired norms through coaching of team members.
|
||||
- Introduce team-based rewards that reinforce desired norms.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Team Roles:**
|
||||
> Set of behaviors that people are expected to perform because they hold specific formal or informal positions in a team.
|
||||
- Similar to norms, but roles apply to one or few specific team members.
|
||||
- Some roles are formally assigned to individual members during team composition.
|
||||
- Most teams have a leader to clarify responsibilities.
|
||||
- Many roles are adopted informally during team development.
|
||||
- These are shared and eventually associated with specific team members.
|
||||
- Employees are attracted to roles that suit their personality and values.
|
||||
- **Role Categories:**
|
||||
- Organizer
|
||||
- Doer
|
||||
- Challenger
|
||||
- Innovator
|
||||
- Team Builder
|
||||
- Connector
|
||||
- Roles can be *taskwork roles* (task performance related) or *teamwork roles* (team maintenance related).
|
||||
|
||||
- **Team Cohesion:**
|
||||
> Degree of attraction people feel toward the team and their motivation to remain members.
|
||||
- High cohesion occurs when members:
|
||||
- Are attracted to the team.
|
||||
- Take ownership of team's success.
|
||||
- Make the team part of their self-concept.
|
||||
- Are committed to the team's goals.
|
||||
- Fell a collective sense of team pride.
|
||||
- **Influences on Team Cohesion:**
|
||||
- **Member Similarity:**
|
||||
- *We are attracted to coworkers who are similar to us*.
|
||||
- We believe similar people are more trustworthy and will create fewer conflicts.
|
||||
- Teams have a high cohesion when members are similar to each other.
|
||||
- Takes longer in diverse teams.
|
||||
- **Team Size:**
|
||||
- Smaller teams have higher cohesion than larger teams.
|
||||
- It is easier for a few people to agree and coordinate.
|
||||
- Members have more influence in smaller teams.
|
||||
- Small teams can lack cohesion if they lack enough qualified members.
|
||||
- **Member Interaction:**
|
||||
- Teams have more cohesion when members interact with each other regularly.
|
||||
- Higher interaction occurs in highly interdependent tasks.
|
||||
- **Somewhat Difficult Entry:**
|
||||
- Teams have higher cohesion when entry to the team is restricted.
|
||||
- The more prestige, the more members will value their membership.
|
||||
- **Team Success:**
|
||||
- Cohesion increases with success as people are attracted to groups that fulfill their goals.
|
||||
- Individuals are more likely to identify with successful teams than with teams that fail.
|
||||
- **External Competition and Challenges:**
|
||||
- Teams have higher cohesion when they face external competition or a challenging objective.
|
||||
- Employees value their membership because of its ability to overcome threats.
|
||||
- Cohesion can dissipate if external challenges overwhelm and threaten the team.
|
||||
- **Consequences of Team Cohesion:**
|
||||
- Teams with higher cohesion tend to perform better than those with low cohesion.
|
||||
- Motivates members to remain members.
|
||||
- Helps the team achieve its objectives.
|
||||
- Members of highly cohesive teams spend more time together and share information more frequently.
|
||||
- Team cohesion has a lower effect on performance when there is low task interdependence.
|
||||
- Effect of cohesion depends on whether the team's norms align with organizational objectives.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Team Trust:**
|
||||
> Positive expectations one person has toward another person in situations involving risk.
|
||||
- **Hierarchy of Trust:**
|
||||
1. **Calculus-Based Trust:**
|
||||
- Logical calculation that other team members will act appropriately because they face sanctions if they violate expectations.
|
||||
2. **Knowledge-Based Trust:**
|
||||
- Based on the predictability of another member's behavior.
|
||||
- Includes confidence in another person's abilities.
|
||||
3. **Identification-Based Trust:**
|
||||
- Based on mutual understanding and an emotional bonding.
|
||||
- Occurs when members think, feel, and act like one another.
|
||||
- Exhibited by high-performance teams.
|
||||
- **Dynamics of Team Trust:**
|
||||
- Employees join a team with a moderate level of trust.
|
||||
- **Swift Trust:**
|
||||
- Having a high initial trust.
|
||||
- Based on the belief that fellow team members are reasonably competent.
|
||||
- Fragile, as it is based on assumptions rather than experience.
|
||||
- Decreases over time.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Team Mental Models:**
|
||||
> Knowledge structures that we develop to describe, explain, and predict the world around us.
|
||||
- Cognitive images that team members form about a team's task, relationship dynamics, and knowledge.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Team Building:**
|
||||
> Activities that attempt to speed up or improve the team development process.
|
||||
- *Task-Focused interventions:*
|
||||
- Clarify team's performance goals.
|
||||
- Increase team motivation.
|
||||
- Establish a mechanism for systematic feedback.
|
||||
- *Problem-Solving Skills Intervention*
|
||||
- *Clarification and Reconstruction of Role Expectations*
|
||||
- *Helping team members improve interpersonal relations*.
|
||||
- Goal setting is usually the most successful type of team building.
|
||||
- <u>Interventions are more successful when they focus on one (rather than multiple) team objectives</u>.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!INFO]
|
||||
> Many team-building activities *fall short* because they are often applied as a general solution without adequately diagnosing specific issues that need ot be addressed.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**8.5 - Self-Directed and Remote (Virtual) Teams**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Self-Directed Teams (SDTs):**
|
||||
> Cross-functional work groups organized around work processes.
|
||||
- <u>These teams complete an entire piece of work requiring multiple interdependence tasks</u>.
|
||||
- Minimal interdependence with people outside of the team.
|
||||
- <u>They have substantial autonomy over task execution</u>.
|
||||
- No direct involvement of a supervisor.
|
||||
- **Success Factors for SDTs:**
|
||||
- They should be responsible for an entire work process.
|
||||
- They should have sufficient autonomy.
|
||||
- Work site and technology should support coordination and communication.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Remote (Virtual) Teams:**
|
||||
> Team whose members operate across space, time, and organizational boundaries. They are linked through information technologies.
|
||||
- Also known as **distributed teams**.
|
||||
- One or more members work remotely.
|
||||
- <u>Members depend on information technologies in addition to or instead of face-to-face interaction</u>.
|
||||
- Team *remoteness* increases with geographic dispersion.
|
||||
- Social distancing and self-isolation have made remote teams more common.
|
||||
- Many employees perform knowledge work rather than physical work.
|
||||
- This enables them to work from almost anywhere.
|
||||
- Information technologies make it easy to communicate remotely.
|
||||
- **Success Factors for Remote Teams:**
|
||||
- Remote teams need to apply effective team behaviors.
|
||||
- Good communication technology and self-leadership skills are required.
|
||||
- Remote teams should have a toolkit of communication channels.
|
||||
- Freedom to choose channels that work best for them.
|
||||
- Clear organizational objectives, documented work processes, and agreed-on responsibilities.
|
||||
- Members should meet face-to-face early in the team development process.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**8.6 - Team Decision Making**
|
||||
|
||||
- Teams can be more effective than individuals at identifying problems, choosing alternatives, and evaluating decisions.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Constraints on Team Decision Making:**
|
||||
- **Time Constraints:**
|
||||
- Teams take longer than individuals to make decisions.
|
||||
- Time is consumed organizing, coordinating, and maintaining relationships, as well as in the team development process.
|
||||
- **Production Blocking:**
|
||||
> Time constraint due to the procedural requirement that only one person may speak at a time.
|
||||
- Team members need to *monitor* the conversation, making it difficult to concentrate on their own ideas.
|
||||
- The longer participants wait to speak, the more likely their ideas will die out.
|
||||
- Team members may concentrate on their ideas and pay less attention to the conversation.
|
||||
- **Evaluation Apprehension:**
|
||||
> Occurs when individuals are reluctant to mention ideas that seem silly because they believe that other members are silently evaluating them.
|
||||
- Based on the desire to create a favorable public image and the need to protect one's self'esteem.
|
||||
- Common in meetings attended by people with different levels of status or expertise.
|
||||
- **Pressure to Conform:**
|
||||
- Team cohesion leads employees to conform to team norms.
|
||||
- This can cause members to suppress dissenting opinions.
|
||||
- When someone states a point of view that violates the majority opinion, other members might punish the violator or try to persuade him/her.
|
||||
- *We depend on the opinions that others hold to validate our own views*.
|
||||
- **Overconfidence (Inflated Team Efficacy):**
|
||||
- **Team Efficacy:** Collective belief among team members in the team's capability to successfully complete a task.
|
||||
- Teams make worse decisions when they are overconfident or under-confident.
|
||||
- Overconfident teams are less vigilant and engage in less constructive debate.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Improving Decision Making and Creativity in Teams:**
|
||||
- Checks and balances to prevent the leader from dominating the discussion.
|
||||
- Teams should be large enough to possess collective knowledge needed to resolve the problem.
|
||||
- Team members should be confident, but be wary about being overconfident.
|
||||
- **Psychological Safety:**
|
||||
> Shared belief that it is safe to engage in interpersonal risk-taking. This means that presenting unusual ideas, disagreeing with the majority, and experimenting will not result in coworkers posing a threat to their self-concept, status, or career.
|
||||
- Requires team norms to encourage employees to respect and value one another.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Team Structures that Encourage Creativity:**
|
||||
- **Brainstorming:**
|
||||
- Encourages participants to think up many ideas for the objective of generating the most creative ideas.
|
||||
- Consists of four rules:
|
||||
1. Speak freely.
|
||||
2. Do not criticize others.
|
||||
3. Provide as many ideas as possible.
|
||||
4. Build on the ideas that others have presented.
|
||||
- Increases divergent thinking.
|
||||
- Requires an experienced facilitator and confident employees.
|
||||
- **Branwriting:**
|
||||
- Variation of brainstorming that minimizes production blocking.
|
||||
- Removes conversation during idea generation.
|
||||
- Individuals write don their ideas rather than verbally describing them.
|
||||
- Produces more and better quality ideas.
|
||||
- **Electronic Brainstorming:**
|
||||
- Uses digital networks to document and share ideas.
|
||||
- Ideas are distributed anonymously to other participants, who are encouraged to *piggyback* on them.
|
||||
- Team members vote electronically on the ideas presented.
|
||||
- Seldom used because it is too structured and technology-bound.
|
||||
- **Nominal Group Technique:**
|
||||
- Participants write down as many solutions as they can, and then describe them to other team members.
|
||||
- Participants silently rank or vote on each proposed solution.
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,371 @@
|
|||
> ### 009 - Power and Influence in the Workspace
|
||||
> Class Notes - October 19, 2023
|
||||
> Emilio Soriano Chávez
|
||||
> ***
|
||||
> <span style="color:#e74c3c">Organizational Behavior</span>
|
||||
> Spring 2023
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**9.0 - Video Lecture Notes**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Power:**
|
||||
> Capacity for a person, team, or organization to influence others.
|
||||
- *Ability to get people to do what you want them to do*.
|
||||
- Can come from formal or informal sources.
|
||||
|
||||
- **French and Ravens Power Typology (1957):**
|
||||
- *Why certain people have influence in certain cases*.
|
||||
- Legitimate
|
||||
- Reward
|
||||
- Coercive
|
||||
- Expert
|
||||
- Referent
|
||||
|
||||
- **Formal Power:**
|
||||
- **Legitimate Power:** Power because of your place in the hierarchy of an organization.
|
||||
- **Reward Power:** Ability to give rewards.
|
||||
- **Coercive Power:** Ability to give punishments.
|
||||
- **Information Power:** Knowing certain pieces of information can give influence.
|
||||
- Can go into the informal space by engaging in gossip.
|
||||
- **Informal Power:**
|
||||
- **Expert Power:** Power from knowing things that other people do not know.
|
||||
- **Referent Power:** Extent to which people like and respect you.
|
||||
- *Transient power* when referring to a third party.
|
||||
- **Charismatic Power:** *Raw magnetism* to a person and the way they talk.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Countervailing Power:**
|
||||
- Even when you do not have much formal or informal power in an exchange, often we have a certain power to keep them in the exchange relationship.
|
||||
- Asymmetric, but not unidirectional.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Tactics for Increasing Individual Power:**
|
||||
- **Substitutability (Monopoly):**
|
||||
- To what extent can you gain a monopoly over a valued resource.
|
||||
- *If you are the person who guards access to X, you can have a lot of influence in an organization*.
|
||||
- **Centrality:**
|
||||
- To what extent are you the central node in a system of relationships.
|
||||
- Connecting people? Social glue? Can people function without you?
|
||||
- **Visibility:**
|
||||
- People need to *feel that you are present*.
|
||||
- *Putting it an appearance in meetings*.
|
||||
- Telecommuting can cause problems in this.
|
||||
- People discount the value on what they do because they are not there.
|
||||
- **Discretion, Autonomy, and Empowerment:**
|
||||
- Are you just here to enforce someone's rule book?
|
||||
- Do you get to make your own decisions?
|
||||
- **Social Networks:**
|
||||
- Can act as a conenctor between diffferent people.
|
||||
- Think of social capital as an exhaustible people.
|
||||
- Who you know and who you can introduce people to.
|
||||
- If you constantly ask for favors or constantly introduce people, your quality relationship erodes and your social capital depletes.
|
||||
- Recognize who has the power and what gives them that power.
|
||||
- Be an essential conduit.
|
||||
- People can only talk to each other through you.
|
||||
- If you are the connector to an outside expert.
|
||||
- Build coalitions and alliances with people with similar interests.
|
||||
- Implicitly or explicitly influence others agenda.
|
||||
- Monitor the impressions you give to people.
|
||||
- Engage in impression management.
|
||||
- **Code-Switching:** When you talk to one group of people, you speak in a different way than when you talk to another group of people.
|
||||
- Make people more comfortable and make yourself more appealing, so you can have more influence
|
||||
- Not just about language and vocabulary.
|
||||
- Extend to which you seek to build consensus vs. be stand-offish.
|
||||
- Develop a conscious understanding of our different *selves* and the unspoken social expectations.
|
||||
- Helps figure out how to exert social pressure to get what you want.
|
||||
- **Resource Dominance:**
|
||||
- If you can develop a specialized knowledge that people want, they may come to you.
|
||||
- For example, being *tech-savvy*.
|
||||
- Sometimes, social ties can be a resource in and of themselves.
|
||||
- Recognize when others have resource dominance.
|
||||
- Someone we may want to ally with or that you will have to work hard to work around.
|
||||
|
||||
- Influence tactics are perceived as good if they help the organization achieve its goals.
|
||||
- **Organizational Politics:**
|
||||
- When influence tactics are perceived to be self-serving, or being done at the expense of coworkers or organizational goals.
|
||||
- Things that influence politics:
|
||||
- Scarce resources.
|
||||
- Ambiguous or complex rules.
|
||||
- When organizations are changing (shift in power and resources).
|
||||
- Norms that reinforce politics.
|
||||
|
||||
- We typically posses formal power by being in the right place.
|
||||
- Right position of authority or to resolve uncertainty.
|
||||
- Informal power is something that can be built.
|
||||
- There is nothing shameful in being aware and exercising your power.
|
||||
- Every organization has social influence tactics.
|
||||
- If you choose to not engage, then other people are influencing and you are not.
|
||||
- Pay attention to your social capital and your social identities.
|
||||
- Spend social capital wisely.
|
||||
- Code switch as needed to adopt identities that suit the situation around you.
|
||||
- Look for opportunities to make yourself important or irreplaceable if you want to increase your influence.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**9.1 - The Meaning of Power**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Power:**
|
||||
> The capacity of a person, team, or organization to influence others.
|
||||
- It is not the act of changing someone's attitude or behavior, but the **potential** to do so.
|
||||
- Power is based on the target's **perception** that the power holder controls.
|
||||
- Power involves an **asymmetric dependence** of one party on another party.
|
||||
- **Countervailing Power:** Capacity of a person, team, or organization to keep a more powerful person or group in the exchange relationship.
|
||||
- The less powerful party has some power to keep the more powerful party in the relationship.
|
||||
|
||||
- All power relationships depend on a minimum level of trust.
|
||||
- *Level of expectation* that the more powerful party will deliver the resource.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Power in the Employee-Manager Relationship:**
|
||||
- Managers typically have more power.
|
||||
- Employees depend on bosses to support employment.
|
||||
- Employees have weaker countervailing power.
|
||||
- Managers depend on employees to complete their required tasks.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Sources and Contingencies of Power:**
|
||||
|
||||
![[A018 - Sources and Contingencies of Power.png | 500]]
|
||||
|
||||
- **Sources of Power in Organizations:**
|
||||
- **Legitimate Power:**
|
||||
> Agreement among organizational members that people in certain roles can request certain behaviors of others.
|
||||
- Originates from formal job descriptions and informal rules of conduct.
|
||||
- Most important source of power in organizations.
|
||||
- **Zone of Indifference:** Limited domain of behaviors that the power holder has the right to ask.
|
||||
- Highly trusted power holders have a large zone of indifference.
|
||||
- People that value conformity and tradition give bosses a larger zone.
|
||||
- Influenced by the organization's culture.
|
||||
- Employees have legitimate power through legal and administrative rights.
|
||||
- **Norm of Reciprocity:**
|
||||
> Felt obligation and social expectation of helping someone who has already helped you.
|
||||
- Form of legitimate power as an *informal rule*.
|
||||
- **Information Control:**
|
||||
- Those who need information are dependent on the *gatekeeper* to provide it.
|
||||
- Information *gatekeepers* gain power by selectively distributing information.
|
||||
- **Reward Power:**
|
||||
> Power derived from a person's ability to control the allocation of rewards valued by others.
|
||||
- Also related to the removal of negative sanctions.
|
||||
- Managers have reward power over the distribution of organizational rewards.
|
||||
- Employees have reward power through organizational citizenship behaviors.
|
||||
- **Coercive Power:**
|
||||
> The ability to apply punishment.
|
||||
- Managers have considerable coercive power through disapproval or firing employees.
|
||||
- Employees have coercive power through peer pressure.
|
||||
- **Expert Power:**
|
||||
> Capacity to influence others by possessing knowledge or skills valued by others.
|
||||
- An important source is the ability to manage uncertainties.
|
||||
- **Managing Uncertainties:**
|
||||
- **Prevention:** *Preventing changes from occurring*.
|
||||
- **Forecasting:** *Predict changes or variations*.
|
||||
- **Absorption:** *Absorbing or neutralizing the impact of changes as they occur*.
|
||||
- **Referent Power:**
|
||||
> Capacity to influence others based on identification with and respect for the power holder.
|
||||
- Largely a function of the person's interpersonal skills.
|
||||
- **Charisma:**
|
||||
> Set of self-presentation characteristics and behaviors that generate interpersonal attraction and referent power over others.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!INFO] Sources of Power
|
||||
> - Legitimate, Reward, and Coercive Powers originate from the power holder's formal or informal position.
|
||||
> - Expert and Referent Powers originate from the power holder's own characteristics.
|
||||
|
||||
- There is a human tendency to *mindlessly* follow the guidance of people who are charismatic or claim to have legitimate expert power.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**9.2 - Contingencies of Power**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Nonsubstitutability:**
|
||||
> Individuals have more power when the resource they offer is nonsubstitutable.
|
||||
- <u>Power decreases as the number of alternative sources of a resource increases</u>.
|
||||
- This also includes substitutions of the resource itself.
|
||||
- **Strategies to Increase Nonsubstitutability:**
|
||||
- Control access to the resource.
|
||||
- Employees are less substitutable when they operate special equipment or have knowledge that is undocumented.
|
||||
- Differentiate the resource from the alternatives.
|
||||
- Wrap skills and knowledge into a *package* so it looks like a service no one else can offer.
|
||||
- Recommended for developing a *personal brand*, which should be authentic and unique.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Centrality:**
|
||||
> The power holder's importance based on the degree and nature of interdependence with others.
|
||||
- <u>Centrality increases with the number of people dependent on the power holder</u>.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Visibility:**
|
||||
> Employees gain power then their talents remain in the minds of the people in the organization.
|
||||
- <u>Power increases with visibility</u>.
|
||||
- Can be increased by taking *people-oriented* jobs and projects that require frequent interactions with executives.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Discretion:**
|
||||
> The freedom to exercise judgement.
|
||||
- Making decisions without referring to a specific rule or receiving permission.
|
||||
- Employees have more power when they are given more autonomy.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Consequences of Power:**
|
||||
- **Empowerment:** When people believe they have power over themselves and freedom from being influenced by others.
|
||||
- Tends to increase motivation, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and job performance.
|
||||
- Increases automatic thinking.
|
||||
- Empowered people tend to rely more on stereotypes, have difficulty empathizing, and have less accurate perceptions.
|
||||
- Having *power over others* produces a sense of responsibility for the people over whom the holder has authority.
|
||||
- They tend to be more mindful and engage in less stereotyping.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**9.3 - Power of Social Networks**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Social Networks:**
|
||||
> Social structures of individuals or social units that are connected to each other through one or more forms of interdependence.
|
||||
- *Employees get ahead by locating themselves within social networks*.
|
||||
- Networks form around common interests, common status, expertise, kinship, or physical proximity.
|
||||
- They exist as a consequence of the *drive to bond*.
|
||||
- **Guanxi:**
|
||||
- Chinese term that refers to an individual's network of social connections.
|
||||
- Being part of a network reinforces one's self-concept.
|
||||
- Important for receiving favors and opportunities from others.
|
||||
- It can undermine an organization's effectiveness.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Social Capital:**
|
||||
> Knowledge, opportunities, and resources available to members of a social network, along with mutual support.
|
||||
- <u>Social networks generate power through social capital</u>.
|
||||
- Members in social networks are motivated to communicate, distribute, and provide resources to others in their community.
|
||||
|
||||
- Social networks potentially enhance and maintain the power of its members through the following resources:
|
||||
- **Information:** Information from other members that improves the individual's expert power.
|
||||
- **Visibility:** Other members more readily think of you than of people outside of the network.
|
||||
- **Referent Power:** Members of a network identify with or have greater trust in each other.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Power Through Social Networks:**
|
||||
- **Strong Ties, Weak Ties, Many Ties:**
|
||||
- **Strong Ties:**
|
||||
- Close-knit relationships.
|
||||
- Valuable because they offer resources more quickly and plentifully.
|
||||
- Offer greater social support and cooperation.
|
||||
- Strong ties tend to be similar to us, so they provide similar information and resources than other strong ties.
|
||||
- **Weak Ties:**
|
||||
- *Being merely acquaintances*.
|
||||
- They are different fro us and more likely to offer unique opportunities, connections, and resources.
|
||||
- Important in job hunting and career development.
|
||||
- **Many Ties:**
|
||||
- Number of people connected to you in a social network.
|
||||
- *The more people you know, the more network resources available to you*.
|
||||
- As a social network grows, you have less time and energy to maintain strong ties.
|
||||
- **Social Network Centrality:**
|
||||
- <u>The more central a person is located in a network, the more social capital (and therefore power) he/she acquires</u>.
|
||||
- **Factors that Determine Centrality:**
|
||||
- **Betweenness:** How much you are located between others in the network.
|
||||
- **Degree Centrality:** Number of connections you have to others in the network.
|
||||
- **Closeness:** *Closeness* of the relationship with others in the network.
|
||||
- **Structural Hole:** An area between two or more dense social network areas that lacks network ties.
|
||||
- A broker is a person who connects two independent networks.
|
||||
|
||||
- **"Dark Side" of Social Networks:**
|
||||
- Social networks can create a *barrier* to those who are not actively connected to them.
|
||||
- To leverage the power of social networks, organizations support several surface-level and deep-level employee groups.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**9.4 - Influencing Others**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Influence:**
|
||||
> Any behavior that attempts to alter someone's attitudes or behavior.
|
||||
- *Power in motion*.
|
||||
- Essential process to coordinate effort to achieve organizational objectives.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Types of Influence Tactics:**
|
||||
- **Silent Authority:**
|
||||
> Occurs when someone complies with a request because of the requester's legitimate power.
|
||||
- *Deference to authority*.
|
||||
- Every organization requires this strategy to operate.
|
||||
- **Assertiveness:**
|
||||
> Applying legitimate and coercive power to influence others.
|
||||
- Also called **vocal authority**.
|
||||
- Includes reminding the target of his/her obligations, checking their work, and using threats of sanctions.
|
||||
- Commonly seen as workspace bullying.
|
||||
- **Information Control:**
|
||||
> Explicitly manipulating someone else's access to information for the purpose of changing his/her behavior.
|
||||
- **Coalition Formation:**
|
||||
> Forming a group that attempts to influence others by pooling the resources and power of its members.
|
||||
- This pools the power of many people so that the coalition has more influence than the individual members.
|
||||
- The mere existence of the coalition can influence others by symbolizing its legitimacy.
|
||||
- It increases the confidence and motivation of its members. (Social Identity Theory)
|
||||
- **Upward Appeal:**
|
||||
> Relying on people with higher authority or expertise to support your position.
|
||||
- Also occurs when relying on the organization's policies or values.
|
||||
- **Persuasion:**
|
||||
> Using logical arguments, factual evidence, and emotional appeals to convince people.
|
||||
- Most widely used and accepted influence strategy.
|
||||
- Quality of effective leaders.
|
||||
- **Elements of Persuasion:**
|
||||
- **Persuader Characteristics:**
|
||||
- Expertise
|
||||
- Credibility
|
||||
- No apparent profit motive.
|
||||
- Appear somewhat neutral.
|
||||
- **Message Content:**
|
||||
- Acknowledges several points of view.
|
||||
- Limited to few strong arguments.
|
||||
- Uses emotional appeals in combination with logical arguments and recommendations.
|
||||
- **Inoculation Effect:** Warning listeners that others will try to influence them in the future.
|
||||
- **Communication Channel:**
|
||||
- High social presence.
|
||||
- Media-richness.
|
||||
- Face-to-face communication.
|
||||
- **Audience Characteristics:**
|
||||
- More difficult to persuade people with high self-esteem and intelligence, or a strong tie to the opposing viewpoint.
|
||||
- **Impression Management:**
|
||||
> Actively shaping the perceptions and attitudes that others have of us.
|
||||
- Done through self-presentation.
|
||||
- Exampled include the way employees dress and how they behave toward colleagues and customers.
|
||||
- **Ingratiation:** Any attempt to increase liking by, or perceived similarity to, some targeted person.
|
||||
- Too much ingratiation is viewed as insincere and self-serving.
|
||||
- **Exchange:**
|
||||
> Promise of benefits or resources in exchange for the target person's compliance with your request.
|
||||
- Includes negotiation and application of the *norm of reciprocity*.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!INFO]
|
||||
> - **Hard Influence Tactics:** The influencer applies extrinsic conditions (obligations, rewards) to control the other party's behavior. They rely on position power.
|
||||
> - Silent Authority
|
||||
> - Assertiveness
|
||||
> - Information Control
|
||||
> - Coalition Formation
|
||||
> - Upward Appeal
|
||||
> - **Soft Influence Tactics:** The person being influenced has more autonomy and control over the influence process. They appeal to attitudes and needs.
|
||||
> - Persuasion
|
||||
> - Impression Management
|
||||
> - Exchange
|
||||
|
||||
- **Responses to Influence:**
|
||||
- **Resistance:**
|
||||
> Occurs when people oppose the behavior desired by the influencer.
|
||||
- **Compliance:**
|
||||
> Occurs when people are extrinsically motivated to implement the influencer's request. This means they do the task for purely **instrumental reasons**.
|
||||
- **Commitment:**
|
||||
> Occurs when people identify with the influencer's request and are highly motivated to implement it without extrinsic sources of motivation.
|
||||
|
||||
- People react more favorably to soft tactics than to hard tactics.
|
||||
- Soft tactics rely on personal sources of power, which build commitment.
|
||||
- Hard tactics rely on position power, which produce compliance or resistance.
|
||||
|
||||
- The most appropriate strategy depends on personal, organizational, and cultural values.
|
||||
- Preferred tactics vary across cultures.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**9.5 - Organizational Politics**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Organizational Politics:**
|
||||
> Use of influence tactics for personal gain at the perceived expense of others and the organization.
|
||||
- All political behaviors apply one or more influence tactics.
|
||||
- It is very difficult to know the political actor's motives or awareness of their actions.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Adverse Consequences of Organizational Politics:**
|
||||
- Lower job satisfaction, commitment, organizational citizenship, and task performance.
|
||||
- Higher levels of stress.
|
||||
- Motivation to leave the organization.
|
||||
- Divert resources away from the organization.
|
||||
|
||||
- Employees with a strong need for **personalized power** are more likely to engage in organizational politics.
|
||||
- In contrast, people with a strong need for socialized power seek power to accomplish beneficial objectives.
|
||||
|
||||
- Individuals with Dark Triad characteristics are more likely to engage in organizational politics.
|
||||
- Machiavelism
|
||||
- Narcissism
|
||||
- Psychopathy
|
||||
|
||||
- **Minimizing Organizational Politics:**
|
||||
- Add resources so that people do not rely on political tactics to safeguard their resources.
|
||||
- Establish clear guidelines for allocation of scarce resources.
|
||||
- Apply organizational change strategies.
|
||||
- Diagnose and alter systems that support self-serving behavior.
|
||||
- Leaders need to become role models of organizational citizenship.
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,540 @@
|
|||
> ### 010 - Ethics, Ethical Reasoning, and Organizational Ethics
|
||||
> Class Notes - October 26, 2023
|
||||
> Emilio Soriano Chávez
|
||||
> ***
|
||||
> <span style="color:#e74c3c">Organizational Behavior</span>
|
||||
> Spring 2023
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**10.0 - Lecture Notes**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Ethics:**
|
||||
> Conception of what is right and wrong.
|
||||
- Individual.
|
||||
- Personal code of ethics comes from religious beliefs, family, school, neighbors, friends, role models, cultural influences, media exposure, among others.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Ethical Principles:**
|
||||
- Guides top moral behaviors.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Business Ethics:**
|
||||
- Application of general ethical ideas to business behaviors.
|
||||
- We do not create a *new* ethical moral code for business.
|
||||
- We pull from the same places.
|
||||
- What does society see as right and wrong.
|
||||
- Businesses are embedded in society.
|
||||
- Part of social responsibility is to meet social expectations if you want o be a socially-responsible company.
|
||||
- If you fail to do so, employees may be uncomfortable.
|
||||
- People may not engage with your business.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Why be Ethical in Business?**
|
||||
- *Something for everyone* benefits, depending on your moral code and the stage in which you are.
|
||||
- **Happy Stakeholders:**
|
||||
- **Stakeholders:**
|
||||
> Anyone with a significant interest in the business.
|
||||
- Commonly investors, but also stockholders, customers, employees, affected communities, or society at large.
|
||||
- Employees will like working with your company and identify with it.
|
||||
- High levels of satisfaction, high levels of commitment, talk more positively about the organization when it is ethical.
|
||||
- Customers will feel *like they can trust you*.
|
||||
- Positive treatment from the media.
|
||||
- **Improved Organizational Performance:**
|
||||
- Customers like you more.
|
||||
- They trust you.
|
||||
- Suppliers give more favorable terms and more interest in working with you.
|
||||
- Employees will have high levels of identification, satisfaction, and commitment.
|
||||
- Higher performance.
|
||||
- Less stressed, more engaged, happier.
|
||||
- **Integrity Capital:** Financial benefit of promoting a culture of integrity.
|
||||
- *Buys some slack*.
|
||||
- Gives you the benefit of the doubt from your people.
|
||||
- **Reduced Legal Risk/Expense:**
|
||||
- Laws encourage companies to be ethical.
|
||||
- Making unethical decisions usually involves money.
|
||||
- Laws are written to make sure that money is gone.
|
||||
- US Corporate Sentencing Guidelines
|
||||
- Sarbanes-Oxley
|
||||
- *Its cheaper to do legal things*.
|
||||
- *Do no harm*.
|
||||
- Not live with the fact that you are *hurting* people (directly or indirectly).
|
||||
- *Be a good person*
|
||||
- Ethical organizations allow and encourage acting in ethical ways.
|
||||
- You get to enact your own values at work.
|
||||
- Act in a way that is consistent with your personal values and beliefs.
|
||||
- If not, it causes counterproductive work behaviors.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Sources of Unethical Behavior:**
|
||||
- **Potential for Personal Gain:**
|
||||
- Self-interest over the interest of other people.
|
||||
- **Competitive Pressure to Increase Profits**
|
||||
- Focus on the firm's interests over others' interests.
|
||||
- **Conflicts of Interest:**
|
||||
- Multiple obligations and loyalties.
|
||||
- Focusing on your own self-interests. (Direct or Indirect)
|
||||
- **Cross-Cultural Contradictions:**
|
||||
- Ethnocentric view.
|
||||
- Focus on the company's interests over diverse cultural values.
|
||||
- **Example - Hawaiian Telescope:**
|
||||
- Place telescope on the top of a mountain.
|
||||
- The spot has a significant religious meaning for the people of Hawaii.
|
||||
- Many protests going on.
|
||||
- They place the interest of science over cultural traditions and values.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Promote Ethical Behavior:**
|
||||
- *Bad Apples vs. Bad Barrels*
|
||||
- *If you have apples in a barrel, and one apple is rotten, it rots other apples*.
|
||||
- Bad individuals contaminating our workforce.
|
||||
- *Or you can have a bad barrel which rots the apples inside*.
|
||||
- Setting up a situation in the workforce that encourages people to act unethically.
|
||||
- As managers, we want to set up an environment that encourages people to act ethically.
|
||||
- Have managers that have and enact ethical values.
|
||||
- Do things consistent with the organization's ethics.
|
||||
- *Tone at the top*
|
||||
- Important with any manger that has consistent face time or influence over employees.
|
||||
- Influence the employee's decision making.
|
||||
- Managers often do not think of decisions as ethical decisions.
|
||||
- Instead, they consider if they are socially approved or legal.
|
||||
- *Low ethical intensity.*
|
||||
- **Ethical Intensity:**
|
||||
> Extent to which you view a decision as an ethical decision.
|
||||
- Some decisions do not have a lot of ethical depth.
|
||||
- Having a strong organizational culture that supports ethics.
|
||||
- **Ethical Climate:**
|
||||
> Unspoken understatement among employees abut what is and is not acceptable behavior.
|
||||
- Encourages employees to make ethical decisions.
|
||||
- Encourage **integrity-based** rather than **compliance-based** approach to ethics.
|
||||
- Compliance-based approaches focuses on adhering to rules and avoiding legal sanctions.
|
||||
- Integrity-base programs also make employee responsible for ethical conduct.
|
||||
- Encouraging people to adhere to ethical values.
|
||||
- Develop and enact an ethics policy or code.
|
||||
- More compliance-based approach.
|
||||
- Cultural differences.
|
||||
- Focus more on ethical elements as opposed to just rules.
|
||||
- Ethics or Compliance Officer
|
||||
- Ethics of Compliance Audits
|
||||
- Ethics Reporting Mechanisms
|
||||
- *Whisteblower*
|
||||
- Training to promote ethics.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Consequences:**
|
||||
- How easy it is to conduct business.
|
||||
- Employees feel committed and quality of work.
|
||||
- Employees you attract.
|
||||
- *Things that help you sleep at night*.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Takeaways:**
|
||||
- Focus is in constructing a *good barrel*.
|
||||
- Encourage regular people to make ethical decisions.
|
||||
- Self-interest should not be the primary focus when making decisions.
|
||||
- Ethical codes are personal.
|
||||
- Organizational ethics should be too.
|
||||
- Ethical action pays:
|
||||
- Decreased legal costs
|
||||
- Increased employee performance, satisfaction, and commitment.
|
||||
- Increased customer and partner trust and loyalty.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**10.1 - The Meaning of Ethics**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Ethics:**
|
||||
> A conception of right and wrong conduct.
|
||||
- Tells is whether our behavior is moral or immoral.
|
||||
- *How we think and behave towards others*.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Ethical Principles:**
|
||||
> Guides to moral behavior.
|
||||
- *Basic rules of behavior* for preserving organized life.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Sources of Ethical Principles:**
|
||||
- Religious Beliefs
|
||||
- Family
|
||||
- Schools
|
||||
- Friends
|
||||
- Admired Role Models
|
||||
- Ethnic Groups
|
||||
- Electronic Media
|
||||
|
||||
- Ethical ideas are present in all societies, but they vary greatly from one another.
|
||||
- **Ethical Relativism:**
|
||||
> Ethical principles should be defined by various periods of time in history, a society's traditions, special circumstances of the moment, or personal opinion.
|
||||
- The meaning given to ethics would be relative to time, place, circumstance, and the individual involved.
|
||||
- This means <u>there would be no universal ethical standards on which people could agree</u>.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Business Ethics:**
|
||||
> Application of general ethical ideas to business behavior.
|
||||
- To be considered ethical, businesses must draw ideas about proper behavior from the same sources as everyone else in society.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Top Types of Observed Misconduct in Business:**
|
||||
- Conflicts of Interest
|
||||
- Abusive or Intimidating Behavior
|
||||
- Lying to Employees
|
||||
|
||||
- **Reasons for Businesses to be Ethical:**
|
||||
- **Meet Demands of Business Stakeholders:**
|
||||
- Stakeholders demand that businesses have high levels of ethical performance and social responsibility.
|
||||
- Many employees believe that their firms address these demands.
|
||||
- If employees have an ethical view of their company, they have greater pride, higher work satisfaction, and are willing to recommend the company.
|
||||
- When companies uphold ethical standards, consumers conduct more business with it.
|
||||
- **Enhance Business Performance:**
|
||||
- *Ethics pays*.
|
||||
- **Integrity Capital:**
|
||||
> The financial benefit a company gets from promoting a culture of integrity among its workforce.
|
||||
- Companies with high integrity capital outperform those with lower integrity capital.
|
||||
- Lack of ethics has a negative financial impact and may result in a loss of business.
|
||||
- **Comply with Legal Requirements:**
|
||||
- Doing business ethically is often a legal requirement.
|
||||
- **U.S. Corporate Sentencing Guidelines:**
|
||||
|
||||
![[A019 - Corporate Sentencing Guidelines.png | 400]]
|
||||
|
||||
- Provide a strong incentive for businesses to promote ethics.
|
||||
- Used to determine culpability (degree of blame) during sentencing when an employee has been found of criminal wrongdoing.
|
||||
- Companies that take these steps typically receive lesser sentences or lower fines.
|
||||
- **Sarbanes-Oxley Act:**
|
||||
- Seeks to ensure that firms maintain high ethical standards in how they conduct and monitor business operations.
|
||||
- Requires executives to vouch for the accuracy of financial reports and pay back bonuses based on earnings proved fraudulent.
|
||||
- Established strict rules for auditing firms.
|
||||
- Most CEOs believe it was an *overreaction*.
|
||||
- **Prevent or Minimize Harm:**
|
||||
- Businesses should act ethically to prevent harm to the public and to stakeholders.
|
||||
- One of the strongest ethical principles is *do no harm*.
|
||||
- Unethical behavior contributes to economic recessions.
|
||||
- **Promote Personal Morality:**
|
||||
- Most people want to act in ways that are consistent with their own sense of right and wrong.
|
||||
- Being pressured to contradict their values creates emotional stress.
|
||||
- Working in a supportive ethical climate increases psychological security.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**10.2 - Why Ethical Problems Occur in Business**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Personal Gain and Selfish Interest:**
|
||||
- Desire for personal gain causes ethics problems.
|
||||
- **Ethical Egoist:**
|
||||
> An individual who places their own self-interest above all other considerations.
|
||||
- Common traits of an ethical egoist include:
|
||||
- Self-Promotion
|
||||
- Focus on Self-Interest (Selfishness)
|
||||
- Greed
|
||||
- *Looking out for number one*.
|
||||
- Usually ignores ethical principles accepted by others.
|
||||
- Altruism seems irrational for an ethical egoist.
|
||||
- **Competitive Pressures on Profits:**
|
||||
- When companies have tough competition, they sometimes engage in unethical activities to protect their profits.
|
||||
- Common in companies whose financial performance is poor.
|
||||
- They are more prone to commit illegal acts.
|
||||
- Intense competition has resulted in unethical practices, like price fixing or violation of competition laws.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Conflicts of Interest:**
|
||||
> When an individual's self-interest conflicts with acting in the best interest of another, when the individual has an obligation to do so.
|
||||
- Failure to disclose conflicts of interest represents deception, and it can hurt the organization.
|
||||
- The *appearance* of a conflict of interest should be avoided, as it undermines trust.
|
||||
- Both individuals and organizations can be in a conflict of interest.
|
||||
- An example is financial fraud, where opportunities for self-enrichment by managers conflict with long-term viability of a firm and the best interests of individuals.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Cross-Cultural Contradictions:**
|
||||
- Many ethical problems occur as corporations do business in other societies where ethical standards differ from those at home.
|
||||
- As businesses become global, cross-cultural questions occur more frequently.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**10.3 - Core Elements of Ethical Character**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Managers' Values:**
|
||||
- As major decision makers, managers have more opportunities than others to create an ethical tone for their company.
|
||||
- Values held by managers serve as models for other employees.
|
||||
- Many employees believe that managers have low honesty and ethics.
|
||||
- Most managers are focused on themselves and primarily concerned on being competent.
|
||||
- Studies show that one out of four managers shows a string concern for moral values.
|
||||
- The challenge for *moral managers* is acting effectively on their beliefs in the day-to-day life of their organizations.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
- **Spirituality in the Workplace:**
|
||||
- **Spirituality:**
|
||||
> A personal belief in a supreme being, religious organization, the power or nature, or some external, life-guiding force.
|
||||
- There is a positive relationship between an organization's economic performance and attention to spiritual values.
|
||||
- Spirituality positively affects performance.
|
||||
- It enhances intuitive abilities and capacity for innovation.
|
||||
- It increases personal growth, employee commitment, and responsibility.
|
||||
- It is important for managers to be sensitive to employees' spirituality.
|
||||
- Others believe that business is a secular (nonspiritual) institution.
|
||||
- There is also a concern on *whose spirituality should be promoted*.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Managers' Moral Development:**
|
||||
- Managers in a company are likely to be at various stages of moral development.
|
||||
- **Stages of Moral Development:**
|
||||
- **Stage 1:**
|
||||
- Childhood
|
||||
- **Ego-centered reasoning**.
|
||||
- Punishment avoidance and obedience to power.
|
||||
- **Stage 2:**
|
||||
- Adolescence, Youth
|
||||
- **Ego-centered reasoning**.
|
||||
- Reward seeking, self-interest, and reciprocity.
|
||||
- **Stage 3:**
|
||||
- Early Adulthood, Adolescence
|
||||
- **Group-centered reasoning**.
|
||||
- *Pleasing others and being admired by them*.
|
||||
- *Going along with what others are doing*.
|
||||
- **Stage 4:**
|
||||
- Adulthood
|
||||
- **Society- and Law-Centered Reasoning**
|
||||
- Individuals focus their reasoning according to society's customs, traditions, and laws.
|
||||
- **Stage 5:**
|
||||
- Mature Adulthood
|
||||
- **Principle-centered reasoning**.
|
||||
- Moral beliefs above and beyond social customs.
|
||||
- Ethical reasoning is based on broad principle sand relationships (human rights, equal treatment, freedom of expression).
|
||||
- **Stage 6:**
|
||||
- Mature Adulthood
|
||||
- **Principle-centered reasoning**.
|
||||
- Meaning of right and wrong is defined by universal principles of justice, fairness, and common rights.
|
||||
- Most managers typically rely on criteria associated with reasoning at stages 3 and 4.
|
||||
- Managers' ethics are influenced by their immediate work group, family, or compliance with the law.
|
||||
- Companies need managers whose personal character is built on a caring attitude toward all affected.
|
||||
- Combination of stage 5 and 6 reasoning.
|
||||
- **Universal Ethical Values:**
|
||||
- Do not harm.
|
||||
- Be fair and just.
|
||||
- Be honest.
|
||||
- Respect others' rights.
|
||||
- Act responsibly.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**10.4 - Methods of Ethical Reasoning**
|
||||
|
||||
![[A020 - Methods of Ethical Reasoning.png | 500]]
|
||||
|
||||
- **Virtue Ethics:**
|
||||
> Ethical theory that focuses on character traits that a *good* person should possess, with the expectation that moral values will direct a person towards good behavior.
|
||||
- Based on *valuable characteristics* rather than rules for correct behavior.
|
||||
- **Moral Virtues:** Habits that enable a person to live according to reason.
|
||||
- **Examples of Moral Virtues:**
|
||||
- Courage
|
||||
- Self-Control
|
||||
- Generosity
|
||||
- Faith
|
||||
- Hope
|
||||
- Cleanliness
|
||||
- Honesty
|
||||
- Trust
|
||||
- <u>An action is morally right if it exhibits a morally virtuous character</u>.
|
||||
- **Limitations:**
|
||||
- Some argue that Virtue Ethics is not an *ethical system*, but rather a system of values that form good character.
|
||||
- Different people offer different sets of values.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Utilitarian Reasoning:**
|
||||
> Ethical theory that emphasizes **utility**, or the overall amount of *good* that can be produced by an action or decision.
|
||||
- Often referred to as a *cost-benefit analysis*.
|
||||
- Costs and benefits can be:
|
||||
- Economic -> Dollar Amounts
|
||||
- Social -> Effect on Society
|
||||
- Human -> Psychological, Emotional
|
||||
- <u>The alternative where the benefits outweigh the costs is ethically preferred</u> because it produces the greatest good for the greatest number of people.
|
||||
- **Limitations:**
|
||||
- Difficulty of accurately measuring both costs and benefits.
|
||||
- The majority may override the rights of the minority.
|
||||
- Managers often fail to consider the means taken to reach the end.
|
||||
- Widely used in business to measure economic and financial outcomes.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Human Rights:**
|
||||
> A **right** means that a person is entitled to something or entitled to be treated in a certain way.
|
||||
- **Basic Human Rights:**
|
||||
- Life
|
||||
- Safety
|
||||
- Free Speech
|
||||
- Freedom
|
||||
- Information
|
||||
- Due Process
|
||||
- Property
|
||||
- Denying rights is normally considered to be unethical.
|
||||
- <u>Individuals are to be treated as valuable ends just because they are human beings</u>.
|
||||
- <u>Using others for your own purposes is unethical if you deny them their goals and purposes</u>.
|
||||
- **Limitations:**
|
||||
- Difficult to balance conflicting rights.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Justice:**
|
||||
> When benefits and burdens are distributed equitably and according to some accepted rule.
|
||||
- **Social Justice:** When a society's income and wealth are distributed among the people in *fair* proportions.
|
||||
- "Fair" does not necessarily mean "equal".
|
||||
- Most societies consider needs, abilities, efforts, and contributions.
|
||||
- <u>Benefits and costs are fairly distributed</u>.
|
||||
- **Limitations:**
|
||||
- Lack of agreement on fair shares.
|
||||
|
||||
- Using only one of the four ethical reasoning methods can lead to an incomplete understanding of all ethical complexities.
|
||||
- Consider if all of the ethics approaches lead to the same decision.
|
||||
|
||||
- We cannot be absolutely certain of the ethics of a decision because different people:
|
||||
- Use different sources of information.
|
||||
- Rely on different values or definitions of a virtuous character.
|
||||
- Measure costs and benefits differently.
|
||||
- Do not share the same meaning of justice.
|
||||
- Rank various rights in different ways.
|
||||
|
||||
- Managers must assign priorities to each method of ethical reasoning.
|
||||
- This is influenced by a company's culture.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**10.5 - Corporate Ethical Climates**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Corporate Culture:**
|
||||
> Blend of ideas, customs, practices, values, and shared meanings that help define normal behavior for every employee in a company.
|
||||
- *The way we do things around here*.
|
||||
- Strong ethical cultures result in lower misconduct.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Ethical Climate:**
|
||||
> *Unspoken* understanding among employees of what is and is not acceptable behavior.
|
||||
- It is the part of the corporate culture that sets the ethical tone in a company.
|
||||
- **Components of Ethical Climates:**
|
||||
- **Egoism (Self-Centered Approach):** Emphasizes self-interest, company interest, and economic efficiency.
|
||||
- **Benevolence (Concern-for-Others Approach):** Emphasizes friendship, team interest, and social responsibility.
|
||||
- **Principle (Integrity Approach):** Emphasizes friendship, team interest, and social responsibility.
|
||||
- Multiple ethical climates may exist within one organization.
|
||||
- Corporate ethical climates can signal that ethical transgressions are acceptable.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**10.6 - Business Ethics across Organizational Functions**
|
||||
|
||||
- Not all ethical issues in businesses are the same.
|
||||
- Ethical issues can appear in any major functional area of a firm.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Accounting Ethics:**
|
||||
- Financial records of publicly held companies are required to be audited by a certified professional accounting firm.
|
||||
- Company managers rely on public audits to make key decisions.
|
||||
- Honesty, integrity, and accuracy are required from the accounting function.
|
||||
- Accountants are often faced with conflicts of interest.
|
||||
- Loyalty to the company may be in conflict with self-interest and interests of others.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**10.7 - Managing Ethics Work in Corporations**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Institutionalizing Ethics:**
|
||||
- Building *ethical safeguards* into a company's everyday routines.
|
||||
- Improves quality of ethical performance.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Building Ethical Safeguards:**
|
||||
- **Compliance-Based Approach:**
|
||||
- Seeks to avoid legal sanctions.
|
||||
- Emphasizes threat of detection and punishment.
|
||||
- Increases employees' willingness to seek ethical advice and shape awareness of ethical issues
|
||||
- **Integrity-Based Approach:**
|
||||
- Combine concern for the law with an emphasis on employee responsibility.
|
||||
- Environment of honesty and fairness.
|
||||
- Increases employees' sense of integrity, commitment to the organization, willingness to deliver bad news, and perception that better decisions are made.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Top Management Commitment and Involvement:**
|
||||
- The example set by executives is critical to fostering ethical behavior.
|
||||
- Senior-level managers and directors signal employees that they believe ethics should receive high priority in all business decisions.
|
||||
- The daily influence of senior management and supervisors are the most essential safeguards for creating an ethical workplace.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Ethics Policies or Codes:**
|
||||
- Provide guidance to managers and employees when they encounter an ethical dilemma.
|
||||
- They differ among countries.
|
||||
- They cover issues like:
|
||||
- Developing Guidelines
|
||||
- Accepting or Refusing Gifts
|
||||
- Avoiding Conflicts of Interest
|
||||
- Securing Proprietary Information
|
||||
- Avoiding Discriminatory Practices
|
||||
- **Instrumental Policies:**
|
||||
- Provide procedures for employees to follow in order to adhere to company policies and societal laws.
|
||||
- More common in the United States and Latin America.
|
||||
- **Legal Compliance and Values and Missions Policies**
|
||||
- More common in Japan, Canada, and European countries.
|
||||
- Written policies are insufficient by themselves to *bring about* ethical conduct.
|
||||
- They must be followed with employee training.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Ethics and Compliance Officers:**
|
||||
- Officer entrusted with ethical compliance and development and implementation of ethics programs.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Ethics Reporting Mechanisms:**
|
||||
- *Helpline* for seeking help about ethical issues, often anonymously.
|
||||
- **Objectives:**
|
||||
1. Provide interpretation of proper ethical behavior.
|
||||
2. Create an avenue to make known to proper authorities any allegations of unethical conduct.
|
||||
3. Give employees and stakeholders a way to discover information about work-related topics.
|
||||
- **Limitations:**
|
||||
- Executives tend to use the helpline more than others *farther down* in the organizational chart.
|
||||
- Some people are lees likely to use the helpline and can be more vulnerable.
|
||||
- Rates of helpline usage are lower in foreign-owned companies.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Ethics Training Programs:**
|
||||
- Most expensive and time-consuming element of an ethics program.
|
||||
- Important for building ethical safeguards.
|
||||
- Done regularly by larger businesses.
|
||||
- Focused on making sure employees now what the law requires and the company expects.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Ethics Audits:**
|
||||
- An auditor is required to note deviations from company's ethics standards and bring them to the attention of the audit supervisor.
|
||||
- Used to assess the effectiveness of ethical safeguards.
|
||||
- **Steps for an Ethics Audit:**
|
||||
1. Have a detailed ethics foundation.
|
||||
2. Develop metrics.
|
||||
3. Create a cross-functional team.
|
||||
4. Audit efficiently.
|
||||
5. Look for other issues.
|
||||
6. Respond consistently and communicate.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Comprehensive Ethics Programs:**
|
||||
- Integration of various ethics safeguards into a comprehensive program.
|
||||
- Each component reinforces each other and becomes more effective.
|
||||
- **Components:**
|
||||
- Top Management Commitment
|
||||
- Ethical Policies or Codes
|
||||
- Compliance Officers
|
||||
- Reporting Mechanisms
|
||||
- Training Programs
|
||||
- Audits
|
||||
- A comprehensive ethics program makes people more likely to report ethical misconduct and be more satisfied with the company's response to it.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Corporate Ethics Awards and Certifications:**
|
||||
- **Ethical Quotient (EQ) Score:**
|
||||
- Considers corporate responsibility performance.
|
||||
- Sponsored by *Ethisphere Magazine*.
|
||||
- **American Business Ethics Awards (ABEA):**
|
||||
- Recognizes companies that show high standards of ethical behavior in they everyday business conduct and response to specific challenges.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**10.8 - Ethics in a Global Economy**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Bribery:**
|
||||
> Questionable or unjust payment, often to a government official, to ensure or facilitate a business transaction.
|
||||
- More likely in countries with low *per capita* income, low salaries for government officials, and less variation in income distribution.
|
||||
- **Combating Bribery:**
|
||||
- A legalistic approach is unlikely to be effective since culture plays an important role.
|
||||
- Integrative approach of economic advancement policies, social investment in education, and friendly business policies.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Reducing Unethical Practices:**
|
||||
- National governments enacting stiff legislative controls.
|
||||
- **Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD):**
|
||||
- Adoption of visible anti-bribery policies.
|
||||
- Sense of responsibility for compliance.
|
||||
- Regular communication and training on foreign bribery.
|
||||
- Observance of anti-bribery compliance measures.
|
||||
- Disciplinary procedures.
|
||||
- **U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA):**
|
||||
- Prohibits paying bribes to foreign government officials, parties or candidates.
|
||||
- Requires companies with foreign operations to adopt accounting practices that ensure full disclosure of transactions.
|
||||
- **United Kingdom's Bribery Act:**
|
||||
- Prohibits bribery of another person, and receiving or accepting a bribe.
|
||||
- Does not require that the improper offer is made *corruptly*.
|
||||
- Does not provide exceptions for *facilitating payments*.
|
||||
- Liability offense for failure to prevent bribery.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**10.9 - Ethics, Law, and Illegal Corporate Behavior**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Laws:**
|
||||
> A society's attempt to formalize the general public's ideas about what constitutes right and wrong conduct in various spheres of life.
|
||||
|
||||
- Ethical concepts are more complex that written rules of law.
|
||||
- They deal with human dilemmas that go beyond the formal language of law.
|
||||
- Following laws cannot always define proper action.
|
||||
- They are not always able to completely codify a society's norms.
|
||||
- <u>Ethical principles are broader than laws</u>.
|
||||
|
||||
- **White-Collar Crime:**
|
||||
> Illegal acts committed by individuals, employees, or business professionals such as fraud, insider trading, embezzlement, or computer crime.
|
||||
- The most common include:
|
||||
- Credit Card Fraud
|
||||
- Price Misrepresentation
|
||||
- Unnecessary Repairs
|
||||
- Monetary loss in the Internet
|
||||
- Identity Theft
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,393 @@
|
|||
> ### 011 - Leadership in Organizational Settings
|
||||
> Class Notes - November 03, 2023
|
||||
> Emilio Soriano Chávez
|
||||
> ***
|
||||
> <span style="color:#e74c3c">Organizational Behavior</span>
|
||||
> Spring 2023
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**11.0 - Video Lecture Notes**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Managerial Leadership:**
|
||||
- Appropriate with stable objectives.
|
||||
- Everything is aligned with the external environment.
|
||||
- Bring forward effectiveness.
|
||||
- Focus on efficiency.
|
||||
- Developing and maintaining employees and their work environment.
|
||||
- Things are stable and going well.
|
||||
- The goal is to create systems to do this better.
|
||||
- Concrete and administrative tasks rather than inspiring or changing.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Change Leadership:**
|
||||
- Assumes that there is a need for change (internal or external).
|
||||
- *Something is shifting*.
|
||||
- Make people feel like change is something worth their time.
|
||||
- Transformational Leadership is one approach.
|
||||
- The goal is to direct the organization towards some strategic vision.
|
||||
- Develop employees towards the vision.
|
||||
- Typically less concrete, as we do not know all details.
|
||||
- *Big-picture* focused.
|
||||
- Rely on experts to figure how to do things.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Leading:**
|
||||
- More people-focused.
|
||||
- More sociocultural and emotional.
|
||||
- Understand and deal with people.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Managing:**
|
||||
- Administrative tasks.
|
||||
- Directive and task-oriented.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Trait Approach to Leadership:**
|
||||
- Different people can have different approaches to leadership and still be effective.
|
||||
- **Personality:**
|
||||
- Extroverted (Dealing with lots of people)
|
||||
- Conscientiousness (Lots of details)
|
||||
- Emotional Intelligence (Understand and empathize with people)
|
||||
- **Self-Concept:**
|
||||
- Strong self-concept
|
||||
- Clear Identity
|
||||
- High Self-Esteem
|
||||
- Self-Efficacy
|
||||
- Internal Locus of Control (Belief that you can affect the things that happen to you)
|
||||
- **Integrity:**
|
||||
- Honesty
|
||||
- Follow-through on Talk (*Walk the Talk*)
|
||||
- Strong Ethical Values
|
||||
- **Drive/Motivation:**
|
||||
- Need for socialized power (and occasionally personalized).
|
||||
- Power to help other people.
|
||||
- Intrinsic Motivation
|
||||
- Need for Achievement
|
||||
- **Knowledge:**
|
||||
- Know about the organization and its industry.
|
||||
- **Intelligence:**
|
||||
- Lots of information from lots of sources.
|
||||
- Need to process.
|
||||
- Analyze complex alternatives and opportunities.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Approaches to Leadership:**
|
||||
- Your approach to leadership should be a function of your innate disposition and how you like to deal with people, as well as the situation.
|
||||
- **Task-Oriented:**
|
||||
- Management and administrative tasks.
|
||||
- Initiate structure.
|
||||
- Focusing on work tasks, following goals, deadlines, feedback, establishing best practices.
|
||||
- Directive Leadership (Path-Goal Theory)
|
||||
- Transactional Leadership
|
||||
- **Relationship-Oriented:**
|
||||
- Consideration.
|
||||
- Focus on employees as people.
|
||||
- We are concerned about their needs, values, and motivation.
|
||||
- Servant Leadership
|
||||
- Supportive Leadership (Path-Goal Theory)
|
||||
- Transformational Leadership
|
||||
- **Combination:**
|
||||
- Participative Leadership
|
||||
- Achievement-Oriented Leadership
|
||||
|
||||
- **Practitioner Perspective from a Leadership Coach:**
|
||||
- Five practices of effective leaders (*The Leadership Challenge*).
|
||||
- Patterns of behavior.
|
||||
- **Modeling the Way:**
|
||||
- Leaders establish ways that their subordinates should be treated and behave themselves.
|
||||
- You are the ultimate role model.
|
||||
- Reinforce it.
|
||||
- **Inspiring a Shared Vision:**
|
||||
- Leaders who believe that they can make a difference inspire people.
|
||||
- Vision for the future.
|
||||
- Create an ideal image of what is possible.
|
||||
- **Challenge the Process:**
|
||||
- Leaders will search for opportunities to challenge and change the status quo.
|
||||
- **Enable Others to Act:**
|
||||
- Enable others to do something by themselves.
|
||||
- Forster collaboration and involve other people.
|
||||
- Give the opportunity to do stuff.
|
||||
- **Encourage the Heart:**
|
||||
- Recognize that things are hard on your employees, even with they are excited or engaged.
|
||||
- Acknowledge that this can be challenging.
|
||||
- Help employees feed their souls and give them opportunities to rest and recover.
|
||||
- Recognize the contributions they make.
|
||||
|
||||
- The most effective leaders handle the administrative tasks while also acknowledging that their followers are people who have needs.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Takeaways:**
|
||||
- While there are some traits that support effective leaders, you can learn them.
|
||||
- Leadership looks different in some people.
|
||||
- If it works, it can be an effective style.
|
||||
- We need to adapt to the situation.
|
||||
- Need for change.
|
||||
- Approaches should be based on situational factors and personal preference.
|
||||
- Be prepared to adapt.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**11.1 - Leadership**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Leadership:**
|
||||
> Influencing, motivating, and enabling others to contribute toward the effectiveness and success of the organization of which they are members.
|
||||
- Leaders motivate others through persuasion and influence tactics.
|
||||
- Leaders are enablers that make it easier for employees to achieve their objectives.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Shared Leadership:**
|
||||
> The view that leadership is a set of roles that everyone performs, not a position assigned to one person.
|
||||
- Companies are more effective when everyone performs leadership responsibilities.
|
||||
- Formal leaders should not try to perform all leadership tasks.
|
||||
- <u>Shared leadership supplements formal leadership</u>.
|
||||
- Better in organizations where formal leaders are willing to delegate power.
|
||||
- Requires a collaborative rather than competitive culture.
|
||||
- Lacks formal authority.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**11.2 - Transformational Leadership Perspective**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Transformational Leadership:**
|
||||
> Leadership perspective that explains how leaders challenge teams by creating, communicating, and modeling a vision for the organization, and inspiring employees to strive for that vision.
|
||||
- Most popular leadership perspective.
|
||||
- Views leaders as *change agents*.
|
||||
- They *move* the organization in directions that provide better opportunities.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Elements of Transformational Leadership:**
|
||||
- **Develop and Communicate a Strategic Vision:**
|
||||
- **Vision:** Positive image or model of the future that energizes and unifies employees.
|
||||
- The vision can be created by the leader, employees, or stakeholders.
|
||||
- It is then championed by the formal leader.
|
||||
- **Features of an Effective Strategic Vision:**
|
||||
- Describes an aspirational future with a higher purpose associated with personal values (*value-based vision*).
|
||||
- Engages employees with a goal that is challenging (requires change) and abstract (has not been experienced).
|
||||
- Unifies employees and aligns their values with the organization's.
|
||||
- <u>The effectiveness of the vision depends on how well leaders communicate it</u>.
|
||||
- Leaders generate meaning and motivation by using metaphors or stories.
|
||||
- Use of verbal and nonverbal communication.
|
||||
- Focus on shared experiences.
|
||||
- **Model the Vision:**
|
||||
- <u>Transformational leaders enact the vision</u>.
|
||||
- They do things that symbolize the vision.
|
||||
- Can be done by visiting customers, moving offices closer to or further from employees, and holding ceremonies to symbolize significant change.
|
||||
- Ensure routine daily activities are consistent with the vision.
|
||||
- This legitimizes the vision and demonstrates what it looks like in practice.
|
||||
- <u>The greater the consistency between the leader's actions, the more employees will believe in and follow the leader</u>.
|
||||
- **Encourage Experimentation:**
|
||||
- Transformational leadership s about change.
|
||||
- Transformational leaders support a learning orientation.
|
||||
- **Learning Orientation:** Set of collective beliefs and norms that encourage people to question past practices, learn new ideas, experiment, and view mistakes as part of the learning process.
|
||||
- **Build Commitment toward the Vision:**
|
||||
- Transforming a vision into reality requires commitment.
|
||||
- Transformational leaders build commitment through words, symbols, and stories.
|
||||
- This creates a *contagious enthusiasm* that energizes people to adopt the vision as their own.
|
||||
- Leaders demonstrate a *can-do* attitude by enacting and behaving consistently with their vision.
|
||||
- Built through rewards, recognition, and celebrations for passed milestones.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Charisma:**
|
||||
> Set of self-presentation characteristics and nonverbal communication that generate interpersonal attraction and referent power over others, as well as follower deference.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!IMPORTANT]
|
||||
> Charisma is not necessarily part of transformational leadership.
|
||||
> - Charismatic leadership motivates through referent power.
|
||||
> - Transformational leadership motivates through behaviors that persuade and earn trust.
|
||||
|
||||
- Charismatic leadership can have negative consequences.
|
||||
- It tends to produce dependency, as followers want to be associated with people who have charisma.
|
||||
- Leaders may become intoxicated by power, leading to more focus on self-interest than on common good.
|
||||
|
||||
- Transformational leadership builds follower empowerment, which reduces dependence.
|
||||
|
||||
- <u>Subordinates are more satisfied and have higher organizational commitment under transformational leaders</u>.
|
||||
- Better job performance.
|
||||
- More organizational citizenship behaviors.
|
||||
- More creative decisions.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Issues with Transformational Leadership:**
|
||||
- Some models engage in circular logic.
|
||||
- Combines leader behaviors with leaders' personal characteristics.
|
||||
- It is usually described as *universal*.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**11.3 - Managerial Leadership Perspective**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Managerial Leadership:**
|
||||
> Leadership perspective stating that effective leaders help employees improve performance and well-being toward current objectives and practices.
|
||||
- Assumes the organization's objectives are aligned with the external environment.
|
||||
- Relates to specific performance and well-being objectives.
|
||||
- More *micro-focused* and concrete.
|
||||
|
||||
- <u>Transformational leadership and managerial leadership depend on each other</u>.
|
||||
- Transformational leadership identifies, communicates, and builds commitment.
|
||||
- *Sets the right direction* (vision).
|
||||
- Managerial leadership translates the abstract vision into specific operational behaviors and practices.
|
||||
- Continuously improves performance and well-being.
|
||||
|
||||
- Managerial and transformational leadership are not embodied in different people or positions.
|
||||
- <u>Every manager needs to apply both behaviors to varying degrees</u>.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Task-Oriented Leadership:**
|
||||
> Includes behaviors that define and structure work roles.
|
||||
- Assigning employees to specific tasks.
|
||||
- Setting goals and deadlines.
|
||||
- Clarifying work duties.
|
||||
- Defining work procedures.
|
||||
- Planning work activities.
|
||||
|
||||
- **People-Oriented Leadership:**
|
||||
- Listening for opinions and ideas.
|
||||
- Creating pleasant work settings.
|
||||
- Showing interest in staff.
|
||||
- Complimenting and recognizing employees.
|
||||
- Showing consideration for employee needs.
|
||||
|
||||
- Effective leaders rely on both task-oriented and people-oriented styles in different circumstances.
|
||||
- With a people-oriented style, employees have more positive attitudes and lower stress and absenteeism.
|
||||
- With a task-oriented style, employees have higher job performance.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Servant Leadership:**
|
||||
> Extension of people-oriented leadership where leaders serve followers, rather than vice versa.
|
||||
- Servant leaders assist others int their need fulfillment.
|
||||
- They usually ask *How can I help you?*.
|
||||
- Typically selfless, egalitarian, humble, empathetic, and ethical.
|
||||
- **Features of Servant Leadership:**
|
||||
- **Natural Desire to Serve Others:**
|
||||
- Deep commitment to help others in their personal growth.
|
||||
- Selfless desire to support others beyond the leader's obligation.
|
||||
- **Humble, Egalitarian, Accepting Relationship with Followers:**
|
||||
- Serve without drawing attention to themselves.
|
||||
- No being judgmental about others or defensive of criticisms.
|
||||
- **Ethical Decisions and Behavior:**
|
||||
- Sensitivity to and enactment of moral values.
|
||||
- Rely on personal values to anchor decisions and behavior.
|
||||
- *Authentic leadership*.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**11.4 - Path-Goal and Leadership Substitutes Theories**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Path-Goal Leadership Theory:**
|
||||
> Leadership theory stating that effective leaders choose the most appropriate leadership style(s) depending on the employee and the situation.
|
||||
- Leaders clarify the link between behaviors and outcomes, and influence the valence of those outcomes.
|
||||
- **Path-Goal Leadership Styles:**
|
||||
- **Directive:**
|
||||
> Behaviors that provide a psychological structure for subordinates.
|
||||
- Same as *task-oriented leadership*.
|
||||
- Includes clarifying performance goals, means, and standards.
|
||||
- Judicious use of rewards and disciplinary actions.
|
||||
- **Supportive:**
|
||||
> Behaviors that provide psychological support for subordinates.
|
||||
- Same as *people-oriented leadership*.
|
||||
- Being friendly, approachable, respecting, and showing concern.
|
||||
- **Participative:**
|
||||
> Behaviors that encourage and facilitate employee involvement in decisions beyond their normal work activities.
|
||||
- Consult with staff members, ask for suggestions, reflect on employee views.
|
||||
- Involve employees in decisions.
|
||||
- **Achievement-Oriented:**
|
||||
> Behaviors that encourage employees to reach their peak performance.
|
||||
- Set challenging goals, seek improvement in performance, show high degree of confidence that employees will assume responsibility.
|
||||
- Applying *goal-setting theory* and positive expectations in *self-fulfilling prophecy*.
|
||||
- **Path-Goal Theory Contingencies:**
|
||||
- Each of the four leadership styles will be more effective in some situations than in others.
|
||||
- Depending on the circumstances, this involves using two or more styles at the same time.
|
||||
- **Situational Variables:**
|
||||
1. Employee characteristics.
|
||||
2. Characteristics of the employee's work environment.
|
||||
- **Contingencies:**
|
||||
- **Skill and Experience:**
|
||||
- A combination of directive and supportive leadership is best for inexperienced or unskilled employees.
|
||||
- Directive leadership is detrimental when employees are skilled.
|
||||
- **Locus of Control:**
|
||||
- People with an internal locus of control prefer participative and achievement-oriented leadership.
|
||||
- They may become frustrated with a directive style.
|
||||
- People with an external locus of control are more satisfied with directive and supportive leadership.
|
||||
- **Task Structure:**
|
||||
- Directive style should be adopted when the task is non-routine.
|
||||
- It is ineffective with simple tasks.
|
||||
- Highly routine and simple jobs require supportive leadership to cope with tedious work.
|
||||
- Participative leadership is preferred for non-routine tasks.
|
||||
- It is ineffective for routine tasks.
|
||||
- **Team Dynamics:**
|
||||
- High team cohesion substitutes supportive leadership.
|
||||
- Performance-oriented team norms substitute directive and achievement-oriented leadership.
|
||||
- Apply a directive style to counteract performance-opposing norms.
|
||||
- Path-goal theory predicts effective leadership better than transformational leadership.
|
||||
- **Issues with Path-Goal Theory:**
|
||||
- Not all contingencies have been investigated.
|
||||
- Assumes leaders can change managerial styles.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Leadership Substitutes Theory:**
|
||||
> Theory that identifies conditions that either limit a leader's ability to influence or make a particular leadership style unnecessary.
|
||||
- *Task-oriented leadership* is less valuable for employees as they gain skill and experience.
|
||||
- It may also be unnecessary when performance-based rewards motivate employees, when the work is intrinsically motivation, or when employees have good self-motivation.
|
||||
- Teams substitute for *task-oriented leadership*.
|
||||
- Team norms that support organizational goals encourage coworkers to perform their tasks.
|
||||
- Coworkers engage n organizational citizenship behaviors when instructing less-experienced employees.
|
||||
- This requires less task-oriented leadership from the manager.
|
||||
- *People-oriented leadership* is less valuable when other forms of social support are available, when the work is enjoyable, and when the employee applies effective coping strategies.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**11.5 - Implicit Leadership Perspective**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Implicit Leadership Theory:**
|
||||
> States that people evaluate a leader's effectiveness in terms of how well that person fits preconceived beliefs about the features of effective leaders (prototypes).
|
||||
- Has two components:
|
||||
- Leader Prototypes
|
||||
- Romance of Leadership
|
||||
|
||||
- **Leadership Prototypes:**
|
||||
> Preconceived beliefs about the features and behaviors of effective leaders.
|
||||
- Developed through socialization.
|
||||
- They shape the follower's expectation and acceptance of others as leaders.
|
||||
- This affects willingness to remain as a follower.
|
||||
- <u>They not only support a person's role as a leader, but also influence follower perceptions of the leader's effectiveness</u>.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Romance of Leadership:**
|
||||
> When followers tend to inflate the perceived influence of leaders on the organization's success.
|
||||
- **Reasons:**
|
||||
- It is easier to explain organizational successes and failures in terms of the leader's ability rather than by analyzing other forces.
|
||||
- People want to believe that life events are generated more from people than from uncontrollable natural forces.
|
||||
- *Employees feel better believing that leaders make a difference so they actively look for evidence that this is so*.
|
||||
- *Fundamental Attribution Error* -> Leaders are given credit for the company's success because employees do not readily see external forces.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**11.6 - Personal Attributes Perspective of Leadership**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Important Leadership Attributes**
|
||||
|
||||
| Leadership Attribute | Description |
|
||||
|:------------------------------------:| --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
||||
| Personality | High levels of extraversion (outgoing, talkative, sociable, and assertive), and conscientiousness (careful,dependable, and self-disciplined). |
|
||||
| Self-Concept | Strong self-beliefs and a positive self-evaluation about their own skills and abilities. |
|
||||
| Leadership Motivation | Need for socialized power (*power to lead others*) to accomplish teams or organizational goals. |
|
||||
| Drive | Inner motivation to pursue goals. |
|
||||
| Integrity | String moral principles demonstrated through truthfulness and consistency of words and deeds. |
|
||||
| Knowledge of the Business | Deep knowledge about the company's environment, which enables making intuitive decisions. |
|
||||
| Cognitive and Practical Intelligence | Above-average cognitive ability to process information, and ability to solve real-word problems by adapting to different environments. |
|
||||
| Emotional Intelligence | Ability to recognize and regulate their own emotions and the emotions of others. |
|
||||
|
||||
- **Authentic Leadership:**
|
||||
> View that effective leaders need to be aware of, feel comfortable with, and act consistently with their values, personality, and self-concept.
|
||||
- *Knowing about yourself and being yourself*.
|
||||
- As people learn more about themselves (self-awareness), they gain a greater understanding of their inner purpose.
|
||||
- This generates a long-term passion for achieving something worthwhile for the organization.
|
||||
- This also involves behaving in ways that are consistent with your self-concept.
|
||||
- Difficult to lead others while pretending to be someone else.
|
||||
- **Regulating Decisions and Behavior:**
|
||||
- Develop your own style and move into positions where that style is most effective.
|
||||
- Think about and consistently apply your stable hierarchy of personal values.
|
||||
- Maintain consistency around your self-concept by having a strong and positive core self-evaluation.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Limitations of the Personal Attributes Perspective:**
|
||||
- Assumes that all effective leaders have the same personal characteristics that are equally important in all situations.
|
||||
- Leadership is too complex to have a universal list of traits.
|
||||
- Some attributes are not important all the time.
|
||||
- Alternative combinations of attributes may be equally successful.
|
||||
- Two people with different sets of personal characteristics may equally be good leaders.
|
||||
- Views leadership as something within a person.
|
||||
- Leadership is relational.
|
||||
- People are effective leaders because of their favorable relationships with followers, not just because they posses specific personal characteristics.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**11.7 - Cross-Cultural and Gender Issues in Leadership**
|
||||
|
||||
- Culture shapes a leader's values and norms, which influences his or her decisions and actions.
|
||||
- Cultural values also shape followers' expectations of leaders.
|
||||
- <u>Leaders whoa ct inconsistently wit cultural expectations are more likely to be perceived as ineffective leaders</u>.
|
||||
|
||||
- Generally, male and female leaders do not differ in their levels of task-oriented or people oriented-leadership.
|
||||
- Women adopt a participative leadership style more readily than men.
|
||||
- Girls are often raised to be more egalitarian and less status-oriented.
|
||||
- Women have *somewhat* better interpersonal skills.
|
||||
- Employees are motivated by their own stereotypes to expect female leaders to be more participative.
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,358 @@
|
|||
> ### 012 - Organizational Culture
|
||||
> Class Notes - November 09, 2023
|
||||
> Emilio Soriano Chávez
|
||||
> ***
|
||||
> <span style="color:#e74c3c">Organizational Behavior</span>
|
||||
> Spring 2023
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**12.0 - Video Lecture Notes**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Organizational Culture:**
|
||||
- A shared set of values, beliefs, assumptions, and norms within an organization.
|
||||
- Mutual understanding of who we are, what we stand for, what people do and act.
|
||||
- Defines what is and is not important to the organization.
|
||||
- Influences how employees think, feel, and behave towards each other and outside people.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Strong Organizational Culture:**
|
||||
- High level of agreement on the values, beliefs and norms.
|
||||
- **Weak Organizational Culture:**
|
||||
- No strong consensus about values.
|
||||
- Occur when a company lacks leadership, vision or is doing many different things.
|
||||
- Hard to tell what is or is not important.
|
||||
- Hard to think and behave in consistent ways.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Positive Culture:**
|
||||
- Encourages innovation, commitment, employee engagement, and care.
|
||||
- Example -> Chick-Fill-A
|
||||
- Oriented towards customer service.
|
||||
- Influenced by Christian values.
|
||||
- Empower employees when they do things right.
|
||||
- Encourage strong customer service.
|
||||
- **Toxic Culture:**
|
||||
- Very competitive.
|
||||
- People believe that they are *just a number* to the company.
|
||||
- *Distributive bargaining* setting.
|
||||
- Unrealistic goals and punishment when they are not met.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Organizational Values:**
|
||||
- **Espoused Values:**
|
||||
- *Talk the talk*.
|
||||
- Things that show in your website, statement, etc.
|
||||
- **Enacted Values:**
|
||||
- *Walk the walk*.
|
||||
- The things the organization actually does.
|
||||
- Ideally, both are the same.
|
||||
- Often, organizations *say pretty things but do not really follow them*.
|
||||
- Mission statements written by committees.
|
||||
- *Watered down*.
|
||||
- We want a high level of congruence between what we say we believe in and what we actually act.
|
||||
- Employees are more satisfied when they members of an organization with values that have congruence with their personal values.
|
||||
|
||||
- Organizational values are part of your culture
|
||||
- Shared set of values and shared understanding.
|
||||
|
||||
- Things that contribute and are evidence of an organizational culture.
|
||||
- *Top-Down Orchestrated:*
|
||||
- Founder says what the organization stands for.
|
||||
- *Socially-Constructed Culture (Bottom Up):*
|
||||
- People develop a consensus of what the organization is about.
|
||||
- Big organizations have a hard time with this.
|
||||
- Founding members have outsized influence on the culture because it is easier to come to consensus with fewer people.
|
||||
|
||||
- Some part of culture we can see and some we have to infer.
|
||||
- Serve as evidence about the organizational culture.
|
||||
- **What we can see:**
|
||||
- **Physical Structure:**
|
||||
- How an office is structured.
|
||||
- Virtual or in person.
|
||||
- Cubicles, open desk, offices.
|
||||
- Open doors, glass doors, etc.
|
||||
- How departments are structured together.
|
||||
- **Language:**
|
||||
- Do people talk about the organization as a family?
|
||||
- Caring or making money?
|
||||
- Customers?
|
||||
- How we think about people within the organization.
|
||||
- **Rituals and Ceremonies:**
|
||||
- Team building activities.
|
||||
- Holiday parties.
|
||||
- **Stories and Legends**
|
||||
- **Founders and Leaders**
|
||||
- **Policies**
|
||||
- **Reward and Compensation**
|
||||
- **Discipline Policies**
|
||||
- **Ethical Policies**
|
||||
- Who works for the company.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Attraction-Selection-Attrition (ASA) Model:**
|
||||
- People who are a good match to your organization's cultures are more likely to be attracted, to be hired, and to stay.
|
||||
- Companies that have a strong unified culture attract employees and keep them (who are good matches).
|
||||
- Shared values and assumptions.
|
||||
- Role of technology.
|
||||
- How you view your customers.
|
||||
- **External Factors:**
|
||||
- Industry Norms
|
||||
- National and Regional Culture
|
||||
|
||||
- **Functions of Culture:**
|
||||
- **Control System:**
|
||||
- Tell people what they should be doing and how they should be acting.
|
||||
- Reinforce norms and rules.
|
||||
- **Social Glue:**
|
||||
- Help people feel connected to their team and organization.
|
||||
- More committed, engaged and *part of the family*.
|
||||
- **Sensemaking Guide:**
|
||||
- Help interpret stuff that happens.
|
||||
- Understand expectations.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Influence on Organizational Performance:**
|
||||
- Weak culture shave little effect.
|
||||
- Strong cultures can have an effect.
|
||||
- If the values are aligned with the environment, the needs of the organization, and the strengths and weaknesses of the members, then it has the potential to support organizational performance.
|
||||
- Misaligned cultures can negatively impact performance.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Socialization:**
|
||||
> Process of bringing a new individual and teaching them what the organization culture is.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Takeaways:**
|
||||
- Cultures come from a variety of influences and act as cultural reinforces (if strong culture).
|
||||
- A strong culture is not necessarily good.
|
||||
- Not all cultures suit all people.
|
||||
- Organizational cultures can be reinforced or changed through the kinds of people you hire, how you socialize them, the decisions made.
|
||||
- Policies and structures.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**12.1 - Elements of Organizational Culture**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Organizational Culture:**
|
||||
> The values and assumptions shared within an organization.
|
||||
- Defines what is important and unimportant in the company.
|
||||
- **Values:** Stable, evaluative beliefs that guide our preferences for outcomes or courses of action.
|
||||
- **Shared Values:** Values that people within an organization have in common.
|
||||
- **Shared Assumptions:** Non-conscious, *taken-for-granted* perceptions that are considered "the correct way to think and act" towards problems and opportunities.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Espoused Values:**
|
||||
> Values that corporate leaders hope will eventually become the organization's culture.
|
||||
- *The values that leaders want others to believe guide the organization*.
|
||||
- Usually socially desirable.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Enacted Values:**
|
||||
> Values that actually guide and influence decisions and behavior.
|
||||
- Apparent when executives and employees are *in action*.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Classification of Organizational Cultures:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Category | Characteristics |
|
||||
|:-------------------:|:----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
||||
| Innovation | Experimenting, opportunity seeking, risk taking, few rules, low cautiousness. |
|
||||
| Stability | Predictability, security, rule-oriented. |
|
||||
| Respect for People | Fairness, tolerance. |
|
||||
| Outcome Orientation | Action-oriented, high expectations, results-oriented. |
|
||||
| Attention to Detail | Precise, analytic. |
|
||||
| Team Orientation | Collaboration, people-oriented. |
|
||||
| Aggressiveness | Competitive, low emphasis on social responsibility. |
|
||||
|
||||
- **Concerns with Organizational Culture Models:**
|
||||
- Oversimplification of cultural values in organizations.
|
||||
- Ignorance of the shared assumptions aspect of culture.
|
||||
- Incorrect assumption that organizations have a clear, unified culture that is easily decipherable.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Dominant Culture:**
|
||||
> Values and assumptions shared most consistently and widely by an organization's members.
|
||||
- Usually supported by senior management.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Subcultures:**
|
||||
- Spread throughout various divisions and groups of an organization.
|
||||
- Some enhance the dominant culture by espousing parallel assumptions and values.
|
||||
- **Countercultures:**
|
||||
> Subcultures that embrace values or assumptions that directly oppose the organization's dominant culture.
|
||||
|
||||
> [!ATTENTION] Some organizations consist of subcultures with no decipherable dominant culture.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Importance of Subcultures:**
|
||||
- They maintain the organization's standards of performance and ethical behavior.
|
||||
- Employees with countercultural values are an important source of surveillance and critical review of the dominant order.
|
||||
- Subculture members support ethical conduct by preventing employees from blindly following one set of values.
|
||||
- They are spawning grounds for emerging values.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**12.2 - Deciphering Organizational Culture through Artifacts**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Artifacts:**
|
||||
> Observable symbols and signs of an organization's culture.
|
||||
- They can be viewed as *symbols* or indicators of culture.
|
||||
- They represent and reinforce an organization's culture.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Categories of Artifacts:**
|
||||
- **Organizational Stories and Legends:**
|
||||
> Stories and legends about the company's founders and past events.
|
||||
- They add human realism to corporate expectations and individual performance standards.
|
||||
- They produce emotions, which improves listeners' memory.
|
||||
- Strongest effect when:
|
||||
- They describe real people.
|
||||
- Are assumed to be true.
|
||||
- Convey clear messages about the way thing should be done.
|
||||
- **Organizational Language:**
|
||||
> Language of the workplace.
|
||||
- *How employees talk to each other, describe customers, express anger, and greet stakeholders*.
|
||||
- **Rituals and Ceremonies:**
|
||||
- **Rituals:**
|
||||
> Programmed routines of daily organizational life that dramatize an organization's culture.
|
||||
- Repetitive and predictable events that have symbolic meaning.
|
||||
- **Ceremonies:**
|
||||
> Planned displays of organizational culture, conducted specifically for the benefit of an audience.
|
||||
- **Physical Structures and Symbols:**
|
||||
> Size, shape, location, and age of buildings.
|
||||
- Buildings support a company's emphasis on teamwork, environmental friendliness, hierarchy, among other values.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**12.3 - Importance of Organizational Culture**
|
||||
|
||||
- An organization's success partly depends on its culture.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Culture Strength:**
|
||||
> How widely and deeply employees understand and embrace the organization's dominant values and assumptions.
|
||||
- In a **strong culture**, core values are shared by most employees across all sub-units.
|
||||
- Company values are also institutionalized through well-established artifacts.
|
||||
- Strong cultures tend to be long-lasting.
|
||||
- Companies have **weak cultures** when dominant values are held by few people at the top of the organization.
|
||||
- <u>Companies are more effective when they have strong cultures</u>.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Functions of Strong Cultures:**
|
||||
- **Control System:**
|
||||
- Organizational culture is a <u>form of social control that influences employee decisions and behavior</u>.
|
||||
- Culture non-consciously directs employees so that their behavior is consistent with organizational expectations.
|
||||
- **Social Glue:**
|
||||
- Organizational culture <u>bonds people together and makes them feel part of the organizational experience</u>.
|
||||
- Employees are motivated to internalize a dominant culture because it fulfills their need for social identity.
|
||||
- **Sense Making:**
|
||||
- Organizational culture helps employees make sense of <u>what goes on and why things happen in the company</u>.
|
||||
- Easier to understand what is expected of employees.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Contingencies of Organizational Culture:**
|
||||
|
||||
![[A021 - Contingencies of Organizational Cultures.png | 500]]
|
||||
|
||||
- Strong cultures improve effectiveness only under specific conditions.
|
||||
- **Culture Content is Aligned with the External Environment:**
|
||||
- Benefits of a strong culture depend on whether the culture's dominant values are aligned with the external environment.
|
||||
- If the culture is **congruent with the environment**, the employees are more motivated and have clearer role perceptions.
|
||||
- If the culture is **misaligned with the environment**, a strong culture can undermine the connection with stakeholders.
|
||||
- **Culture Strength Is Not the Level of a Cult:**
|
||||
- Very strong cultures (*corporate cults*) may be less effective than companies with moderately strong cultures.
|
||||
- They lock people into mental models, which blinds them to new opportunities and unique problems.
|
||||
- They suppress dissenting subcultures.
|
||||
- **Culture is an Adaptive Culture:**
|
||||
- **Adaptive Culture:**
|
||||
> Organizational culture in which employees are receptive to change, including the ongoing alignment of the organization to its environment.
|
||||
- Adaptive cultures embrace change, creativity, open-mindedness, growth, and learning.
|
||||
- Employees adopt an open systems view and take responsibility for the organization's performance.
|
||||
- Strong learning orientation (collective belief that encourages people to question past practices).
|
||||
|
||||
- <u>An organization's culture influences the ethical conduct of its employees</u>.
|
||||
- Good behavior is driven by ethical values.
|
||||
- Ethical values become embedded in an organization's dominant culture (and the opposite is also true).
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**12.4 - Merging Organizational Cultures**
|
||||
|
||||
- Mergers and acquisitions often fail when the merging organizations have incompatible cultures.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Bicultural Audit:**
|
||||
> Process of diagnosing cultural relations between companies and determining the extent to which cultural clashes will likely occur.
|
||||
- **Process:**
|
||||
1. Identifying cultural differences between merging companies.
|
||||
2. Determine which differences result in conflict and which cultural values provide common ground.
|
||||
3. Identifying strategies and preparing action plans to bridge both cultures.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Strategies for Merging Different Organizational Cultures:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Strategy | Description | Best When |
|
||||
|:-------------:|:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
||||
| Assimilation | Employees at the acquired company willingly embrace the cultural values of the acquiring organization | Acquired company has a weak culture or is dysfunctional. |
|
||||
| Deculturation | Acquiring company imposes its culture on then acquired organization. | Acquired firm's culture is dysfunctional, but employees are not aware of the problems. |
|
||||
| Integration | Combine the cultures of the two firms into a new *composite* culture that preserves the best features of the previous cultures | Companies have weak cultures or cultures have overlapping values that can be improved. |
|
||||
| Separation | Merging companies agree to remain distinct entities with minimal exchange of culture. | Merging companies are in unrelated industries with different *appropriate* cultural values. | | | |
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**12.5 - Changing and Strengthening Organizational Culture**
|
||||
|
||||
- <u>Changing an organization's culture is a monumental change</u>.
|
||||
- External environments change over time, so organizations need to shift their culture to maintain alignment.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Strategies for Changing and Strengthening Organizational Culture:**
|
||||
- **Model Desired Culture through the Actions of Founders and Leaders:**
|
||||
> The company's founder is often an inspiring visionary who provides a role model for others to follow.
|
||||
- Organizational culture will be reinforced in the future through stories and legends about the founder.
|
||||
- Founders usually establish an organization's culture.
|
||||
- Subsequent leaders need to actively guide, reinforce, and alter the culture.
|
||||
- Associated with transformational and authentic leadership.
|
||||
- **Align Artifacts with the Desired Culture:**
|
||||
> Artifacts are mechanisms that keep the culture in place or shift the culture to a new set of values.
|
||||
- Systems and structures (artifacts) support the *desired state of affairs*.
|
||||
- **Introduce Culturally Consistent Rewards and Recognition:**
|
||||
> Reward systems and informal recognition practices have a powerful effect on strengthening or reshaping an organization's culture.
|
||||
- **Support Workforce Stability and Communication:**
|
||||
> A strong culture depends on a stable workforce.
|
||||
- Organizational stories, rituals, ceremonies, and organizational metaphors are rarely written down.
|
||||
- It takes time for employees to fully understand an organization's culture.
|
||||
- The organization's culture can disintegrate during periods of high turnover.
|
||||
- **Attraction-Selection-Attrition (ASA) Theory:**
|
||||
- Organizations have a natural tendency to attract people with values that are consistent with the organization.
|
||||
- **Attraction:**
|
||||
- Avoid prospective employees whose values seem incompatible with the employer's values.
|
||||
- **Selection:**
|
||||
- Assess how well a job candidate *fits in* with the company's culture.
|
||||
- **Attrition:**
|
||||
- People seek workplaces that are congruent with their personal values.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**12.6 - Organizational Socialization**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Organizational Socialization:**
|
||||
> Process by which individuals learn the values, expected behaviors, and social knowledge necessary to assume their roles in an organization.
|
||||
- Helps newcomers adjust to coworkers and work procedures.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Learning and Adjustment Process:**
|
||||
- Organizational socialization is a **learning process** because newcomers try to make sense of the company's workplace and dynamics.
|
||||
- Learning expectations, power dynamics, culture, history, and jargon.
|
||||
- Formation of relationships with people from whom they can *learn the ropes*.
|
||||
- Supports *organizational comprehension*.
|
||||
- Organizational socialization is an **adjustment process** because individuals need to adapt to their new work environment.
|
||||
- Development of new work roles that reconfigure their social identity.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Stages of Organizational Socialization:**
|
||||
|
||||
![[A022 - Stages of Organizational Socialization.png | 600]]
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Preemployment Socialization:**
|
||||
- Actively searching about the company and forming expectations.
|
||||
- Learning and adjustment that occurs before the first day of work.
|
||||
- Relies on indirect information, which is often distorted.
|
||||
- Many companies only describe positive aspects of the job and company.
|
||||
- Applicants hide negative information, act out of character, and embellish past information.
|
||||
- Employers are reluctant to ask some types of questions.
|
||||
- Applicants avoid asking questions about salaries and promotion opportunities.
|
||||
2. **Encounter:**
|
||||
- Newcomers test how well their expectations fit reality.
|
||||
- **Reality Shock:** Stress that results when employees perceive discrepancies between their preemployment expectations and the job reality.
|
||||
- **Unmet Expectations:** When the employer does not deliver on its promises.
|
||||
- **Unrealistic Expectations:** Distorted work expectations formed from information exchange conflicts.
|
||||
3. **Role Management:**
|
||||
- Occurs when employees make the transition from newcomers to insiders.
|
||||
- Strengthening of relationships with coworkers and supervisors.
|
||||
- Practice of new role behaviors.
|
||||
- Adoption of attitudes and values consistent with their new positions and the organization.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Realistic Job Preview (RJP):**
|
||||
> Method in which job applicants are given a balance of positive and negative information about the job and work context.
|
||||
- Helps job applicants decide for themselves whether their skills and values are compatible with the job.
|
||||
- Tend to reduce turnover and increase job performance.
|
||||
- They help develop more accurate preemployment expectations.
|
||||
|
||||
- Socialization agents play a central role in the socialization process.
|
||||
- Supervisors provide technical information and feedback.
|
||||
- Coworkers are easily accessible, can answer questions, and serve as role models for appropriate behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
- <u>Organizational socialization is most successful when companies help newcomers strengthen their social bonds with other employees</u>.
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,406 @@
|
|||
> ### 013 - Organizational Change
|
||||
> Class Notes - November 16, 2023
|
||||
> Emilio Soriano Chávez
|
||||
> ***
|
||||
> <span style="color:#e74c3c">Organizational Behavior</span>
|
||||
> Spring 2023
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**13.0 - Video Lecture Notes**
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
- **Lewin's Force Field Analysis Model:**
|
||||
- In every organization, there are forces driving for change and forces restraining for change.
|
||||
- **Driving Forces:**
|
||||
- Encourage organization to evolve.
|
||||
- Have new policies.
|
||||
- New leadership.
|
||||
- Environmental changes.
|
||||
- New regulations.
|
||||
- Economic crises.
|
||||
- New competitors.
|
||||
- **Restraining Forces:**
|
||||
- Employee resistance.
|
||||
- People who benefit the way things are right now.
|
||||
- **Organizational Inertia:**
|
||||
- Tendency to keep going in the same direction.
|
||||
- Changing a lot of things requires a lot of work.
|
||||
- Change makes people anxious.
|
||||
- Change is episodic.
|
||||
- Only happens sometimes.
|
||||
- Most of the time, organizations are in a *frozen stage*, where restraining forces are winning and keep things the way they are.
|
||||
- Sometimes, we enter an **unfreezing period**.
|
||||
- Not necessarily common.
|
||||
- Driving forces overcome restraining forces.
|
||||
- **Causes:**
|
||||
- Driving forces became stronger.
|
||||
- Restraining forced became weaker.
|
||||
- Both.
|
||||
- We can make the organizational change.
|
||||
- **Refreezing Period:**
|
||||
- Refreeze into a new status quo.
|
||||
- Hopefully, we have done our organizational change.
|
||||
- Restraining forces triumph over the driving forces.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Resistance to Change:**
|
||||
- Some compose restraining forces.
|
||||
- Some are expected from employees when we offer an organizational change.
|
||||
- **Negative Valence (Self-Interest):**
|
||||
- Cost-benefit analysis.
|
||||
- Things are better right now than with the change.
|
||||
- May be accurate or not.
|
||||
- Lots of uncertainty, especially people with high neuroticism or need for stability.
|
||||
- More likely to be comforted with anxiety.
|
||||
- **Fear of the Unknown:**
|
||||
- Uncertainty.
|
||||
- If people do not know, this makes them very anxious.
|
||||
- People stress and do poor work, leave the organization, or do gossip and political maneuvering.
|
||||
- ***Not Invented Here* Syndrome:**
|
||||
- If people do not feel they had a part in coming up with an idea.
|
||||
- **Breaking Routines:**
|
||||
- People have to re-learn how to do work and make decisions.
|
||||
- Breaking routines creates more work and anxiety.
|
||||
- **Incongruence between Existing Team and Organization Norms and Systems:**
|
||||
- If the change's procedures and expectations does not include changing norms or systems, the change will not be a good fit for the organization.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Overcoming Resistance to Change:**
|
||||
- How we want to help employees overcome resistance to change.
|
||||
- **Communicate:**
|
||||
- Get people on board with the premise.
|
||||
- Create sense of urgency and need.
|
||||
- People need to understand why the change is necessary.
|
||||
- **Learning Approach:**
|
||||
- Opportunity fro growth.
|
||||
- Understand and feedback.
|
||||
- Everyone needs to adapt and learn, but we can do it together as an organization.
|
||||
- Learning to be better, not necessarily succeeding.
|
||||
- Allows time to pass to people can adjust and acclimate to ideas.
|
||||
- **Encourage Employee Involvement in the Process:**
|
||||
- Directly -> Identifying what needs to change or how.
|
||||
- Negotiating -> What do you think or need.
|
||||
- Coalitions -> Interest groups who want things accomplished. We can address them.
|
||||
- Involving people makes them more likely to be *bought in*.
|
||||
- Do not ask people to come up with recommendations and then ignore them.
|
||||
- **Stress Management Aids:**
|
||||
- Recognize that change is hard for everyone.
|
||||
- Takes time and energy.
|
||||
- Team-building activities, counselors, relaxation, vacation.
|
||||
- Most common way is for managers to check on their employees.
|
||||
- **Coercion:**
|
||||
- Threaten and punish your way into change.
|
||||
- *Get on board or get out*.
|
||||
- Almost always there are better options.
|
||||
- **Pilot Project:**
|
||||
- *Show that the change works*.
|
||||
- Start with a small division in the organization and show that it is successful there.
|
||||
- May also naturally diffuse.
|
||||
- Sometimes, changes do not go well, so pilot projects are good for this.
|
||||
- Will tell us timely if it does not work.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Approaches for Organizational Change:**
|
||||
- **Action Research Approach:**
|
||||
- Focuses on fixing problems.
|
||||
- Identify and solve problems.
|
||||
- Balance changing attitudes and behaviors with doing research to understand problems and testing.
|
||||
- *Usually the default approach*.
|
||||
- **Appreciative Inquiry Approach:**
|
||||
- Focus on positively building strengths and capabilities rather than identifying problems.
|
||||
- *What are we good at that we can build on to be better?*.
|
||||
- *What makes us unique?*.
|
||||
- Does not focus on the idea that an organization is a problem that we need to fix.
|
||||
- Instead, we want to build on the great things that we do.
|
||||
- Based on positive psychology.
|
||||
- It is recommended to do both approaches.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Cultural Change:**
|
||||
- It is hard to change an organizational culture intentionally.
|
||||
- Multiple pieces that contribute to or are affected by the culture.
|
||||
- Norms, values, and assumptions that cultures are built on are often unspoken.
|
||||
- Socially created and hard to change.
|
||||
- It is possible to change.
|
||||
- *Top-down* and *bottom-up* processes need to meet.
|
||||
|
||||
- **5 Keys to make Cultural Change Stick:**
|
||||
1. If we want a cultural change, we need a mach between our culture and our strategy.
|
||||
- What are we wanting to accomplish as an organization?
|
||||
- This needs to be aligned with your culture.
|
||||
- Know what your strategy and your culture is.
|
||||
- If we do not understand them, change will not be consistent and will not make sense.
|
||||
- Be specific.
|
||||
- Substance and specificity.
|
||||
2. Focus on shifting a few critical behaviors.
|
||||
- What is actually going on int he organization.
|
||||
- What are the root causes that tell you that you need to change things.
|
||||
- Understand what behaviors we want from our employees.
|
||||
- *Key levers* to push to reinforce culture.
|
||||
- What few key things can we push that will reinforce and underpin the whole change in the way of thinking.
|
||||
- *Building from the bottom up*.
|
||||
3. Honor the strengths of your existing culture.
|
||||
- Appreciative Inquiry Approach
|
||||
- Understand your strengths an good practices already going on in the organization.
|
||||
- Or in small departments or clusters.
|
||||
- Build on these strengths.
|
||||
- Do not *build the ship from scratch*.
|
||||
- Build self-esteem and self-efficacy on people.
|
||||
4. Integrate formal and informal intervention.
|
||||
- Changes should be informal and formal.
|
||||
- Informal:
|
||||
- *Walk the walk*.
|
||||
- How you talk to employees.
|
||||
- Criteria to make decisions.
|
||||
- How you direct managers to talk to their subordinates.
|
||||
5. Measure and monitor the change.
|
||||
- We cannot tell if its working if we do not measure it.
|
||||
- Figure out key metrics and milestones.
|
||||
- What is the evidence that the change is working.
|
||||
- Know ahead of time.
|
||||
- **Performance Indicators:**
|
||||
- Sales Numbers
|
||||
- Attendance Numbers
|
||||
- Customer Retention
|
||||
- Know how these metrics will be affected.
|
||||
- **Critical Behaviors:**
|
||||
- Behaviors that are consistent with the change we want to make.
|
||||
- **Milestones:**
|
||||
- Key points in the cultural change project process.
|
||||
- See if they are met on schedule and on appropriate level of performance.
|
||||
- Change sin underlying beliefs, feelings and mindsets in ways that our cultural change is influencing them how we want.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Takeaways:**
|
||||
- Organizational change can be hard.
|
||||
- Lots of reasons that employees resist change.
|
||||
- There are ways to get employees onboard with the change.
|
||||
- The strategy should be a function on why they are resisting the change.
|
||||
- Different tools are suitable for fixing different problems.
|
||||
- Cultural change is particularly challenging.
|
||||
- Intangible
|
||||
- Large socially constructed element. (bottom up)
|
||||
- To do *top down* stuff we have to meet with the *bottom up* stuff.
|
||||
- We need to understand underlying problems and strengths.
|
||||
- Not easy or quick.
|
||||
- If we take the time to be intentional, understand things, and monitor and make corrections, we can do it.
|
||||
|
||||
- When we do an organizational change, everything is affected.
|
||||
- Think about all the levels.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**13.1 - Lewin's Force Field Analysis Model**
|
||||
|
||||
- Organizations operate as open systems.
|
||||
- They need to continually evolve with ongoing changes in their external environment.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Force-Field Analysis:**
|
||||
> Model of system-wide change that helps change agents diagnose the forces that drive proposed organizational change.
|
||||
- Developed by Kurt Lewis.
|
||||
- **Driving forces** push organizations towards a new state of affairs.
|
||||
- New Competitors
|
||||
- New Technologies
|
||||
- Evolving Client Expectations
|
||||
- Corporate Leaders
|
||||
- **Restraining forces** maintain the *status quo* and are commonly called *resistance to change*.
|
||||
- <u>Stability occurs when driving and restraining forces are in equilibrium (equal strength)</u>.
|
||||
- **Unfreezing:**
|
||||
> First part of the change process. The change agent produces disequilibrium between driving and restraining forces.
|
||||
- **Refreezing:**
|
||||
> Systems and structures are introduced to reinforce and maintain desired behaviors.
|
||||
- Effective change occurs by:
|
||||
- Unfreezing -> Moving to Desired Condition -> Refreezing
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**13.2 - Understanding Resistance to Change**
|
||||
|
||||
- Resistance is a common and natural human response.
|
||||
- *Even when people support change, they assume that is others who need to do the changing*.
|
||||
|
||||
- Change agents sometimes interpret resistance to change as relationship conflict.
|
||||
- They attack the competence of those who resist the change.
|
||||
- This escalates the conflict and generates stronger resistance to the change initiative.
|
||||
|
||||
- It is more productive to view resistance to change as task conflict.
|
||||
- Resistance can be viewed as a signal that the change agent has not prepared employees for change, or that the change initiative should be altered.
|
||||
|
||||
- Giving employees an opportunity to discuss concerns improves procedural justice and decision making.
|
||||
- Constructive conversations generate a feeling of fairness among employees.
|
||||
|
||||
- Resistance is motivated behavior.
|
||||
- Change agents can harness the motivational force to strengthen commitment to the change initiative.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Reasons that Employees Resist Change:**
|
||||
- **Negative Valence of Change:**
|
||||
> When employees believe that the post-change situation will have more negative than positive outcomes.
|
||||
- Imperfect application of the rational choice decision-making model to estimate outcomes.
|
||||
- Mainly considers how the change affects employees personally.
|
||||
- **Fear of the Unknown:**
|
||||
> Organizational change has a degree of uncertainty, and employees assume the worst when they are unsure of the outcomes.
|
||||
- Associated with a lack of personal control.
|
||||
- **Status Quo Bias:** Uncertainty in change is less desirable than the certainty of the status quo.
|
||||
- **Not-Invented-Here Syndrome:**
|
||||
> When employees oppose change initiatives that are introduced by people outside of their group.
|
||||
- More common among employees who are responsible for the knowledge or initiative.
|
||||
- **Breaking Routines:**
|
||||
> Resisting initiatives that require people to break automated routines and learn new role patterns.
|
||||
- Unless new patters are reinforced, employees tend to revert to their past routines.
|
||||
- **Incongruent Team Dynamics:**
|
||||
> Conforming to existing team norms may discourage employees from accepting organizational change.
|
||||
- **Incongruent Organizational Systems:**
|
||||
> When misaligned rewards, systems, patterns, or criteria *pull people back* to their old attitudes and behavior.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**13.3 - Unfreezing, Changing, and Refreezing**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Effective Change (Lewin's Force Field Analysis Model):**
|
||||
1. Unfreezing the current situation.
|
||||
2. Moving to a desired condition.
|
||||
3. Refreezing the system to maintain the desired state.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Unfreezing:**
|
||||
- Occurs when driving forces are stronger than restraining forces.
|
||||
- **Strategies:**
|
||||
- **Increase the Driving Forces:**
|
||||
- Motivate employees to change through fear or threats.
|
||||
- Rarely works, as this strategy is usually met with an equal and opposing increase in restraining forces.
|
||||
- **Weaken or Remove Restraining Forces:**
|
||||
- Produces no motivation for change.
|
||||
- This strategy *clears the pathway* for change, but does not motivate anyone to go there.
|
||||
- **Do Both:**
|
||||
- Increase the driving forces and reduce or remove the restraining forces.
|
||||
- Create urgency for change and lessen motivation to oppose the change.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Creating an Urgency for Change:**
|
||||
- There are rare situations when the forces of change are widely known and worrisome to employees.
|
||||
- In this case, employees are motivated to dive into new practices.
|
||||
- One example is the COVID-19 pandemic.
|
||||
- Most of the time, leaders *buffer* employees from the external environment.
|
||||
- Driving forces are then hardly felt by anyone below the top executive level.
|
||||
- Consequently, employees do not understand the need to change.
|
||||
- <u>The change process needs to begin by making the external forces for change known to employees</u>.
|
||||
- This can be done by putting executives and employees in direct contact with customers.
|
||||
- Dissatisfied customers represent a compelling drive force for change.
|
||||
- When organizations perform well, decision makers become less vigilant about external threats and more resistant to change.
|
||||
- Creating a need for change requires a lot of persuasive influence.
|
||||
- Employees may see this strategy as manipulative, which undermines trust in the change agent.
|
||||
- Motivation can be developed through a vision of a more appealing future.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Strategies for Minimizing Resistance to Change:**
|
||||
|
||||
| Strategy | Description | When to Apply | Problems |
|
||||
|:--------------------:| ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
||||
| Communication | Leaders motivate employees to support change by telling them about external threats and opportunities, as well as illuminating the future and reducing fear of the unknown. | When employees do not feel urgency for change or do not know how the change will affect them. | Time-consuming and costly. |
|
||||
| Learning | Helps employees perform better following the change and increases readiness for change by strengthening the belief about working successfully in the new situation (*self-efficacy*). | When employees need to break old routines. | Time-consuming, costly, and some employees may not be able to learn new skills. |
|
||||
| Employee Involvement | Involved employees feel more personally responsible for successful implementation of the change. This minimizes *not-invented-here* syndrome and fear of the unknown. | When change requires more employee commitment. | Very time-consuming. May lead to poor decisions if employee interests are not compatible with organizational needs. |
|
||||
| Stress Management | Helps employees cope with changes and minimizes resistance by reducing negative valence and fear of the unknown. | When communication, training, and involvement do not ease worries. | Time-consuming an expensive. |
|
||||
| Negotiation | Promise of benefits in exchange for compliance. | When employees will lose something of value from the change, or the change must happen quickly. | Expensive. Tends to produce compliance, but not commitment. |
|
||||
| Coercion | Assertive influence behaviors to ensure compliance. Confrontation and punishment to force adherence. | When other strategies are ineffective and the company needs to change quickly. | Leads to subtler forms of resistance and long-term antagonism. |
|
||||
|
||||
- **Refreezing Desired Conditions:**
|
||||
- Leaders need to refreeze new behaviors by realigning organizational systems and team dynamics with the desired changes.
|
||||
- Organizational rewards are powerful systems to refreeze behaviors.
|
||||
- Feedback mechanisms help employees learn how well they are moving towards desired objectives.
|
||||
- *What gets measured, gets done*.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**13.4 - Leadership, Coalitions, and Pilot Projects**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Elements in Effective Change Processes:**
|
||||
- **Transformational Leadership:**
|
||||
- Effective change requires *change champions* that apply the elements of transformational leadership.
|
||||
- Leaders develop a vision of the organization's desired future state (**strategic vision**).
|
||||
- Provides sense of direction.
|
||||
- Establishes success factors.
|
||||
- Provides emotional foundation.
|
||||
- Minimizes fear of he unknown.
|
||||
- Leaders communicate the vision in meaningful ways and act in ways consistent with that vision.
|
||||
- **Coalitions and Social Networks:**
|
||||
- Change agents cannot lead the initiative alone.
|
||||
- **Guiding Coalition:**
|
||||
- Change agents need assistance of people with a similar degree of commitment.
|
||||
- Ideally, this includes employees from most levels of the organization.
|
||||
- Members should be *influencers* who are highly respected by peers.
|
||||
- **Social Networks:**
|
||||
> Structures of people connected to each other by one or more forms of interdependence.
|
||||
- Coalition members support change by feeding into these networks.
|
||||
- Participants have high trust, so opinions are more persuasive.
|
||||
- They provide better opportunity for behavior observation.
|
||||
- Social networks represent the channels through which news and opinions are transmitted.
|
||||
- **Viral Change:**
|
||||
> Variation of word-of-mouth and viral marketing where information is seeded to a few people and then spread to others through friendship connections.
|
||||
- **Pilot Projects:**
|
||||
> Introducing change to one work unit of the organization.
|
||||
- Tests the effectiveness of and employee support for the transformation.
|
||||
- More flexible and less risky than a company-wide initiative.
|
||||
- Easier to select groups with high readiness for change.
|
||||
- **Diffusion of Change:**
|
||||
1. Employees are more likely to adopt the practices of a pilot project when they are motivated to do so.
|
||||
2. Employees must have the ability to adopt practices introduced in the pilot project.
|
||||
3. Pilot projects get diffused when employees have clear role perceptions.
|
||||
4. Employees require supportive situational factors (resources and time) to participate in the pilot study.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**13.5 - Approaches to Organizational Change**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Action Research Approach:**
|
||||
> Problem-focused change process that combines:
|
||||
> - **Action Orientation:** Changing attitudes and behavior.
|
||||
> - **Research Orientation:** Testing theory though data collection and analysis.
|
||||
- The change process needs to be *action-oriented*, as the goal is to improve workplace behavior and practices.
|
||||
- The change process is a *research study* because change agents apply a conceptual framework to a real situation.
|
||||
- Highly participative, as it requires the knowledge and commitment of members in the system.
|
||||
- **Action Research Process:**
|
||||
|
||||
![[A023 - Action Research Process.png | 600]]
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Form Client-Consultant Relationship:**
|
||||
> Consultant determines the client's readiness for change.
|
||||
- Assume that the change agent originates outside the system (like a consultant).
|
||||
2. **Diagnose the Need for Change:**
|
||||
> Diagnose the problem to determine the appropriate direction for the change effort.
|
||||
- Relies on systematic analysis of the situation (gathering and analyzing data about an ongoing system).
|
||||
- Involves employees so they understand, support, and improve the change method.
|
||||
3. **Introduce Intervention:**
|
||||
> Apply one or more actions to correct the problem.
|
||||
- *Incremental Change* -> The organization fine-tunes the system and takes small steps towards a desired state.
|
||||
- *Rapid Change* -> The system is overhauled decisively and quickly.
|
||||
4. **Evaluate and Stabilize Change:**
|
||||
> Evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention against the standards established in the diagnostic step.
|
||||
- If the activity has the desired effect, the change agent and the participants need to stabilize the new conditions.
|
||||
- *Refreezing process*.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Appreciative Inquiry Approach:**
|
||||
> Organizational change strategy that directs the group's attention away from its own problems and focuses participants on the group's potential and positive elements.
|
||||
- Emphasizes building on strength rather than trying to directly correct problems.
|
||||
- **Positive Organizational Behavior:**
|
||||
> Perspective that focuses on building positive qualities and traits within individuals as opposed to focusing on what is wrong with them.
|
||||
- **Principles of Appreciative Inquiry:**
|
||||
- **Positive Principle:** Focusing on positive events produces more positive change.
|
||||
- **Constructionist Principle:** The questions we ask and the language we use construct different realities.
|
||||
- **Simultaneity Principle:** Inquiry and change are simultaneous, not sequential.
|
||||
- **Poetic Principle:** Organizations are open books, so we have choices in how they may be perceived.
|
||||
- **Anticipatory Principle:** People are motivated and guided by the vision they see and believe in for the future.
|
||||
- **Four-D Model of Appreciative Inquiry:**
|
||||
|
||||
![[A024 - Four-D Model of Appreciative Inquiry.png | 500]]
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Discovery:** Identifying the positive elements of the organization.
|
||||
2. **Dreaming:** Envisioning what might be possible in an ideal organization.
|
||||
3. **Designing:** Forming a common mental model of *what should be*.
|
||||
4. **Delivering (Destiny):** Establishing specific objectives based on the model of *what will be*.
|
||||
|
||||
***
|
||||
**13.6 - Cross-Cultural and Ethical Issues in Organizational Change**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Cultural Issues with Organizational Change Practices:**
|
||||
- Many are built around Western cultural assumptions and values.
|
||||
- These may differ from and conflict with other cultures.
|
||||
- They often assume change has a beginning and an ending in a logical linear sequence.
|
||||
- Some cultures have an interconnected view of change.
|
||||
- Some interventions assume effective organizational change is punctuated by tension and overt conflict.
|
||||
- This is incompatible with cultures that emphasize harmony.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Ethical Issues with Organizational Change Practices:**
|
||||
- Risk of violating individual privacy rights.
|
||||
- The *action research model* is built on collecting information from members.
|
||||
- Employees provide personal information and reveal emotions they would not normally divulge.
|
||||
- Some activities potentially increase management's power by inducing compliance and conformity.
|
||||
- *Action research* requires participation rather than allowing individuals to get involved voluntarily.
|
||||
- Some interventions undermine the individual's self-esteem.
|
||||
- Unfreezing requires that participants *disconfirm* their existing beliefs.
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 933 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 252 KiB |
BIN
12 - Fall 2023/Organizational Behavior/Assets/A003 - MTBI.png
Normal file
After Width: | Height: | Size: 1.6 MiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 200 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 46 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 223 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 205 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 328 KiB |
BIN
12 - Fall 2023/Organizational Behavior/Assets/A009 - OB Mod.png
Normal file
After Width: | Height: | Size: 180 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 308 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 153 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 484 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 400 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 110 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 375 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 156 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 496 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 155 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 107 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 532 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 112 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 406 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 351 KiB |
After Width: | Height: | Size: 264 KiB |